• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续螯合冲洗使用 DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl 联合或不联合强功率超声对清除碎屑和玷污层的效果。

Effect of Continuous Chelation Irrigation Using DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with or without High-power Sonic Activation on Debris and Smear Layer Removal.

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint- Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2023 Mar;8(2):162-169. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.93064.

DOI:10.14744/eej.2022.93064
PMID:37010200
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10098435/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) combined with a novel chelating agent DualRinse HEDP (Medcem GmbH, Weinfelden, Switzerland), a product consisting of 0.9 g of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid (HEDP) powder, with or without high-power sonic activation on debris and smear layer removal.

METHODS

Seventy-five mandibular premolars were divided into 5 groups (n=15) and treated with different irrigation protocols: group 1 (D3N), DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl without activation; group 2 (D3NA), DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with activation (EDDY, VDW, Munich, Germany) during the final irrigation; group 3 (3NE), 3% NaOCl+17% Ethylenediaminetetracetic acid (EDTA)+3% NaOCl without activation; group 4 (3NEA), 3% NaOCl+17% EDTA+3% NaOCl with activation during the final irrigation; group 5 (NC), negative control group, 0.9% saline. Samples were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate residual debris and smear layer at 3 levels of the root canal: coronal, middle, and apical. Statistical analysis was performed with a level of significance set at p<0.05. The normality distribution of scores within each group was assessed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. A Kruskal-Wallis test followed by multiple comparison tests was used to compare scores among the 5 groups on the apical, middle, and coronal levels of the root canal. A Friedman test followed by multiple comparison tests was used to compare scores within the apical, middle, and coronal levels for each treatment group.

RESULTS

Debris score was significantly the lowest for D3NA, followed by D3N, 3NEA and 3NE at all root levels (p<0.05). The smear layer score was significantly the lowest for D3NA, followed by D3N, 3NEA and 3NE only at the apical level, while no significant difference was found in the middle and coronal levels between the groups (p<0.05). DualRinse HEDP resulted in less debris and smear layer compared to the classic approach of NaOCl without activation. Implementing sonic activation further improved debris and smear layer removal.

CONCLUSION

DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl improved debris removal at all levels and smear layer elimination at the apical level of the root canal. These results were further enhanced when adding high-power sonic activation. (EEJ-2022-09-116).

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估次氯酸钠(NaOCl)与新型螯合剂 DualRinse HEDP(Medcem GmbH,Weinfelden,瑞士)联合应用,该产品由 0.9 克 1-羟乙基二膦酸(HEDP)粉末组成,是否会对根管内的残屑和玷污层去除产生影响。

方法

75 颗下颌前磨牙分为 5 组(n=15),采用不同的冲洗方案进行处理:组 1(D3N),DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl 无激活;组 2(D3NA),DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl 激活(EDDY,VDW,慕尼黑,德国)在最终冲洗期间;组 3(3NE),3% NaOCl+17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)+3% NaOCl 无激活;组 4(3NEA),3% NaOCl+17% EDTA+3% NaOCl 激活在最终冲洗期间;组 5(NC),阴性对照组,0.9%生理盐水。采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析样本,以评估根管内 3 个水平(冠、中、根尖)的残留残屑和玷污层。使用显著性水平 p<0.05 进行统计分析。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 和 Shapiro-Wilk 检验评估每组内评分的正态分布。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验和多个比较检验比较 5 个组在根管根尖、中部和冠部的评分。使用 Friedman 检验和多个比较检验比较每个处理组的根尖、中部和冠部的评分。

结果

在所有根管水平上,D3NA 的残屑评分最低,其次是 D3N、3NEA 和 3NE(p<0.05)。D3NA 的玷污层评分最低,其次是 D3N、3NEA 和 3NE,仅在根尖水平,而各组在中部和冠部水平之间无显著差异(p<0.05)。与无激活的经典 NaOCl 方法相比,DualRinse HEDP 可减少残屑和玷污层。实施超声激活进一步改善了残屑和玷污层的去除。

结论

DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl 可提高根管内各水平的残屑去除率和根尖水平的玷污层消除率。当添加高功率超声激活时,这些结果得到进一步增强。(EEJ-2022-09-116)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/3a7c7ce6c9c6/EEJ-8-162-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/f9a4e48cbc57/EEJ-8-162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/08505168eca3/EEJ-8-162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/3a7c7ce6c9c6/EEJ-8-162-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/f9a4e48cbc57/EEJ-8-162-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/08505168eca3/EEJ-8-162-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8de4/10098435/3a7c7ce6c9c6/EEJ-8-162-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of Continuous Chelation Irrigation Using DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl with or without High-power Sonic Activation on Debris and Smear Layer Removal.连续螯合冲洗使用 DualRinse HEDP+3% NaOCl 联合或不联合强功率超声对清除碎屑和玷污层的效果。
Eur Endod J. 2023 Mar;8(2):162-169. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.93064.
2
In Vitro Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Different Irrigating Solutions.不同冲洗液对玷污层和碎屑去除及抗菌活性的体外评价。
Eur Endod J. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):81-88. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.19042. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
3
Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals.不同终末冲洗液激活方案对弯曲根管内玷污层去除效果的影响。
J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.037. Epub 2010 May 13.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer and Debris on the Canal Walls prepared with a Combination of Hand and Rotary ProTaper Technique using Scanning Electron Microscope.使用扫描电子显微镜对手动与旋转ProTaper技术联合制备的根管壁上的玷污层和碎屑进行比较评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):574-81.
5
Canal cleanliness using different irrigation activation systems: a SEM evaluation.不同冲洗激活系统对根管清洁效果的 SEM 评估
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Dec;21(9):2681-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2070-x. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Effects of heat in the properties of NaOCl alone and mixed with etidronate and alkaline tetrasodium EDTA.热对次氯酸钠单独和与依替膦酸、四乙酸二钠混合时性能的影响。
Int Endod J. 2021 Apr;54(4):616-627. doi: 10.1111/iej.13450.
7
The Effectiveness of Different Irrigation Techniques on Debris and Smear Layer Removal in Primary Mandibular Second Molars: An Study.不同冲洗技术对下颌第二磨牙原发性感染根管内玷污层和碎屑去除效果的研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Nov 1;23(11):1173-1179. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3440.
8
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.使用ProTaper和Hero Shaper器械联合次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗后残留碎屑和玷污层的扫描电子显微镜评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):e63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.032. Epub 2008 Aug 13.
9
The effect of different irrigation protocols on smear layer removal in root canals of primary teeth: a SEM study.不同冲洗方案对乳牙根管内玷污层去除效果的影响:扫描电镜研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):380-385. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1577491. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Cleanliness and erosion of root canal walls after irrigation with a new HEDP-based solution vs. traditional sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA. A scanning electron microscope study.新型 HEDP 溶液冲洗根管后与传统次氯酸钠联合 EDTA 冲洗根管后根管壁的清洁度和侵蚀:扫描电镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3699-3706. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03249-w. Epub 2020 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
In Vitro Evaluation of Bovine Pulp Dissolution Using Dual Rinse HEDP at Different Temperatures.不同温度下使用双冲洗羟基乙叉二膦酸(HEDP)对牛牙髓溶解的体外评估
Eur Endod J. 2025 May;10(3):205-210. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.86547.
2
Tissue-friendly dentin treatments as a potential element in revascularization protocol (ex-vivo study).组织友好型牙本质处理作为再血管化方案中的一个潜在要素(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05550-0.
3
Evaluation of the efficiency of smear layer removal during endodontic treatment using scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
In Vitro Evaluation of Different Irrigation Protocols on Intracanal Smear Layer Removal in Teeth with or without Pre-Endodontic Proximal Wall Restoration.不同冲洗方案对有或无根管治疗前近中壁修复的牙齿根管内玷污层去除效果的体外评价
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 16;9(10):3325. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103325.
2
Cleanliness and erosion of root canal walls after irrigation with a new HEDP-based solution vs. traditional sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA. A scanning electron microscope study.新型 HEDP 溶液冲洗根管后与传统次氯酸钠联合 EDTA 冲洗根管后根管壁的清洁度和侵蚀:扫描电镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Oct;24(10):3699-3706. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03249-w. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
使用扫描电子显微镜评估根管治疗期间玷污层去除效率的体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 28;25(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05510-8.
4
Evaluation of the effect of different irrigation solutions used in regenerative endodontic treatment of necrotic molar teeth with open apex on postoperative pain- randomized clinical trial.不同冲洗液用于根尖开放的坏死磨牙再生性牙髓治疗术后疼痛影响的评估——随机临床试验
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 16;29(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06153-3.
The efficacy of different irrigation protocols in removing tricalcium silicate-based sealers from simulated root canal irregularities.
不同冲洗方案在从模拟根管不规则处去除硅酸三钙类封闭剂方面的效果。
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Nov;82(11):1862-1868. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23353. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Impact of Different Irrigant Agitation Methods on Bacterial Elimination from Infected Root Canals.不同冲洗液搅拌方法对感染根管内细菌清除的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;7(3):64. doi: 10.3390/dj7030064.
5
Qualitative analysis of smear layer treated with different etidronate concentrations: A scanning electron microscopy study.不同依替膦酸浓度处理玷污层的定性分析:扫描电子显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Sep;82(9):1535-1541. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23318. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
6
Effectiveness of different activated irrigation techniques on debris and smear layer removal from curved root canals: a SEM evaluation.不同活化冲洗技术对弯曲根管内碎屑和玷污层清除效果的扫描电镜评价
Aust Endod J. 2020 Apr;46(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/aej.12342. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
7
Chemical, cytotoxic and genotoxic analysis of etidronate in sodium hypochlorite solution.次氯酸钠溶液中依替膦酸二钠的化学、细胞毒性和遗传毒性分析。
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1228-1234. doi: 10.1111/iej.13110. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
Removal of Calcium Hydroxide from Artificial Grooves in Straight Root Canals: Sonic Activation Using EDDY Versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and XPendo Finisher.去除直根管人工凹槽中的氢氧化钙:EDDY 超声激活与被动超声冲洗和 XPendo 根管锉的比较。
J Endod. 2019 Mar;45(3):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.001.
9
Efficacy of irrigant activation techniques in removing intracanal smear layer and debris from mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.冲洗液激活技术清除成熟恒牙根管内玷污层和碎屑的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Endod J. 2018 Jun;51(6):605-621. doi: 10.1111/iej.12877. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Evaluation of smear layer removal and marginal adaptation of root canal sealer after final irrigation using ethylenediaminetetraacetic, peracetic, and etidronic acids with different concentrations.使用不同浓度的乙二胺四乙酸、过氧乙酸和依替膦酸进行最终冲洗后,对根管封闭剂的玷污层去除和边缘适应性进行评估。
Microsc Res Tech. 2017 Jul;80(7):687-692. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22851. Epub 2017 Feb 12.