• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双侧与单侧全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of bilateral to unilateral total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1047-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02785-0. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02785-0
PMID:37010657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10533595/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) has become the treatment of choice in many centers for patients with inguinal hernia (IH). Our aim was to compare the morbidity outcomes of bilateral vs unilateral IH repair using the laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal (TEP) technique, to determine whether undertaking bilateral IH repair places patients at additional risk.

METHODS

Manuscripts published up to the end of 2021 on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Patients (> 16 years) undergoing a primary elective unilateral or bilateral TEP operation, using the standard 3-port laparoscopic technique, were identified. Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. Meta-analysis was conducted where possible. Where this was not possible, vote counting was conducted using effect direction plots.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies, with a total of 18,153 patients were included. Operative time was significantly longer for bilateral operations. There was no significant difference in conversion to open, post-operative seroma, urinary retention, haematoma, and length of hospital stay. There was an increased rate of hernia recurrence in patients undergoing bilateral IH repair.

CONCLUSION

Although limited by the observational nature of the included studies, there is no conclusive evidence to suggest a differential burden of morbidity between unilateral and bilateral TEP IH repair. As all included papers are from observational studies only, evidence from all outcomes is at best very low quality. This manuscript thereby highlights a need for randomized controlled trials to be conducted in this area.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜疝修补术(LH)已成为许多中心治疗腹股沟疝(IH)患者的首选方法。我们的目的是比较使用腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)技术治疗双侧与单侧 IH 修复的发病率结果,以确定进行双侧 IH 修复是否会使患者面临额外的风险。

方法

在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上搜索截至 2021 年底发表的文献。确定接受单侧或双侧 TEP 手术的患者(年龄>16 岁),使用标准的 3 端口腹腔镜技术进行。使用 GRADE 标准评估证据质量。在可能的情况下进行荟萃分析。在不可能进行荟萃分析的情况下,使用效应方向图进行计数投票。

结果

共纳入 8 项观察性研究,总计 18153 例患者。双侧手术的手术时间明显延长。中转开放、术后血清肿、尿潴留、血肿和住院时间无显著差异。行双侧 IH 修复的患者疝复发率增加。

结论

尽管受纳入研究的观察性质限制,但没有确凿的证据表明单侧和双侧 TEP IH 修复的发病率存在差异。由于所有纳入的论文均来自观察性研究,因此所有结局的证据充其量只是低质量。本研究强调需要在这一领域开展随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/eef9a0f0f63c/10029_2023_2785_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/9b6dd974265f/10029_2023_2785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/72fb3afc1d38/10029_2023_2785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/e2cb2a17f8b1/10029_2023_2785_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/ba68439db7df/10029_2023_2785_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/a472f1d1b55a/10029_2023_2785_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/eef9a0f0f63c/10029_2023_2785_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/9b6dd974265f/10029_2023_2785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/72fb3afc1d38/10029_2023_2785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/e2cb2a17f8b1/10029_2023_2785_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/ba68439db7df/10029_2023_2785_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/a472f1d1b55a/10029_2023_2785_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c08/10533595/eef9a0f0f63c/10029_2023_2785_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of bilateral to unilateral total extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双侧与单侧全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1047-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02785-0. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
3
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
4
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜及机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
6
Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.老年患者开放与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):179. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03368-x.
7
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub2.
8
Comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional multiple-port laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔与传统多孔腹腔镜疝修补术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2016 Feb;20(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1443-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
9
Totally extra-peritoneal repair versus trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair for the laparoscopic surgical management of sportsman's hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.完全腹膜外修补术与经腹腹膜前修补术治疗运动员疝腹腔镜手术治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5399-5413. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08554-3. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.在李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术中,使用胶水与缝线进行补片固定对慢性疼痛和复发的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine closed-suction drainage reduces seromas following totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.常规密闭式引流可减少完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的发生:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 15;103(11):e37412. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037412.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of clinically occult inguinal hernia diagnosed with ultrasonography.经超声诊断的临床隐匿性腹股沟疝的内镜完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术的疗效
Pol Przegl Chir. 2021 May 7;93(4):11-14. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.8695.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
A study of contralateral occult inguinal hernia in adult male patients undergoing total extraperitoneal herniorraphy.
一项关于接受完全腹膜外疝修补术的成年男性患者对侧隐匿性腹股沟疝的研究。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Jun 30;9(6):2975-2979. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_207_20. eCollection 2020 Jun.
4
The effect direction plot revisited: Application of the 2019 Cochrane Handbook guidance on alternative synthesis methods.效果方向图再探:2019 年 Cochrane 手册关于替代综合方法的指导应用。
Res Synth Methods. 2021 Jan;12(1):29-33. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1458. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.系统评价中不进行荟萃分析的综合 (SWiM):报告指南。
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6890.
6
How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial.如何使用 R 进行荟萃分析:实用教程。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2019-300117. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
7
Opioid utilization in minimally invasive versus open inguinal hernia repair.微创手术与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的阿片类药物使用情况。
Surgery. 2019 Nov;166(5):752-757. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Preoperative predictors of poor acute postoperative pain control: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前预测急性术后疼痛控制不佳的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e025091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025091.
9
What happens after no contralateral exploration in total extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy of clinical unilateral inguinal hernias?临床单侧腹股沟疝的完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术中不进行对侧探查会有什么后果?
Hernia. 2018 Jun;22(3):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1752-x. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
10
Prospective randomized study comparing single-incision laparoscopic versus multi-trocar laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair at 2 years.前瞻性随机研究比较单切口腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术 2 年的疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3262-3272. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6045-z. Epub 2018 Jan 23.