• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解影响痴呆症患者照顾者使用住宅暂息服务的因素:基于安德森健康服务使用行为模型的定性研究。

Understanding factors influencing residential respite service use by carers of people living with dementia using Andersen's behavioural model of health services use: A qualitative study.

机构信息

NIHR Policy Research Unit for Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, England.

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London, England, UK.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;27(10):1946-1955. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2196254. Epub 2023 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1080/13607863.2023.2196254
PMID:37010982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10511030/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Residential respite (RR) provides a valuable break for family carers, but little known about its offer, take-up or experiences of carers of people living with dementia. This paper aims to further understandings of factors influencing RR use.

DESIGN

RR stakeholder workshop and qualitative interviews.

SETTING

Stakeholder or living in the community in own home.

PARTICIPANTS

RR stakeholders (13); family carers with experience of RR, or had declined it, or were planning to use it for the first time ( = 36).

METHODS

Stakeholders participated in a workshop to discuss provision, models and funding of RR. Family carer interviews focused on expectations, experiences and outcomes of use of RR. Data were analysed thematically and mapped against Andersen's model of health service use.

RESULTS

Identifying need for RR does not necessarily transpire into use. Planning and ease of booking were crucial for carers, but many felt there was little support with this. Systemic factors concerning funding, planning and booking RR act as barriers to its use.

CONCLUSION

Findings highlight how systemic factors influence RR use. Discussing respite need in routine care planning or reviews may support carers and people living with dementia to consider RR, but system changes are needed to address barriers.

摘要

目的

家庭喘息服务为照顾者提供了宝贵的休息机会,但对于痴呆症患者照顾者对其的了解甚少,包括服务提供、接受和体验等方面。本研究旨在进一步了解影响家庭喘息服务使用的因素。

设计

家庭喘息服务利益相关者研讨会和定性访谈。

地点

利益相关者或居住在社区自己家中。

参与者

家庭喘息服务利益相关者(13 名);有家庭喘息服务使用经验(使用过、拒绝过或计划首次使用)的照顾者( = 36 名)。

方法

利益相关者参加了一个研讨会,讨论家庭喘息服务的提供、模式和资金问题。照顾者的访谈重点是使用家庭喘息服务的期望、经验和结果。使用主题分析方法对数据进行分析,并与安德森卫生服务使用模型相对应。

结果

确定对家庭喘息服务的需求并不一定意味着会使用。规划和预订的便利性对照顾者至关重要,但许多人认为在这方面几乎没有得到支持。与资金、规划和预订家庭喘息服务相关的系统性因素是其使用的障碍。

结论

研究结果强调了系统性因素如何影响家庭喘息服务的使用。在常规护理计划或评估中讨论喘息需求可能有助于照顾者和痴呆症患者考虑使用家庭喘息服务,但需要进行系统变革以解决障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0bf/10511030/7778decee577/CAMH_A_2196254_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0bf/10511030/7778decee577/CAMH_A_2196254_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0bf/10511030/7778decee577/CAMH_A_2196254_F0001_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding factors influencing residential respite service use by carers of people living with dementia using Andersen's behavioural model of health services use: A qualitative study.理解影响痴呆症患者照顾者使用住宅暂息服务的因素:基于安德森健康服务使用行为模型的定性研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;27(10):1946-1955. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2196254. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Knowledge, help-seeking and efficacy to find respite services: an exploratory study in help-seeking carers of people with dementia in the context of aged care reforms.知识、寻求帮助和寻找缓解服务的效果:在老年护理改革背景下,对痴呆症患者照顾者寻求帮助的探索性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-1009-7.
3
Multiple Stakeholders' Perspectives on Respite Service Access for People With Dementia and Their Carers.多利益相关者对痴呆症患者及其照顾者获得暂息服务的看法。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e490-e500. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz095.
4
Why carers of people with dementia do not utilise out-of-home respite services.为什么痴呆症患者的护理人员不使用非家庭喘息服务。
Health Soc Care Community. 2013 Jul;21(4):411-22. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12030. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
5
Perspectives of Australian family carers of people with dementia on the 'cottage' model of respite: Compared to traditional models of residential respite provided in aged care facilities.澳大利亚痴呆症患者家庭照顾者对“小屋”式暂托模式的看法:与老年护理机构提供的传统住宿式暂托模式相比。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 May;28(3):850-861. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12916. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Is it worth it? Carers' views and expectations of residential respite for people living with dementia during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,对于照顾痴呆症患者的护理人员来说,入住提供短暂住宿和护理服务的疗养院是否值得?他们对此的看法和期望如何?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5680.
7
A review of the factors associated with the non-use of respite services by carers of people with dementia: implications for policy and practice.痴呆症患者照料者不使用喘息服务的相关因素综述:对政策和实践的启示
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jan;22(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12036. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
Key stakeholders' experiences of respite services for people with dementia and their perspectives on respite service development: a qualitative systematic review.关键利益相关者对痴呆症患者的暂息服务的体验及其对暂息服务发展的看法:定性系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Dec 7;17(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0676-0.
9
Literature review: use of respite by carers of people with dementia.文献综述:痴呆症患者照料者对喘息服务的使用情况
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Jan;23(1):51-53. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12095.
10
An evaluation of a domiciliary respite service for younger people with dementia.对为患有痴呆症的年轻人提供的居家临时护理服务的评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2002 Nov;8(4):377-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2002.00379.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust, consistency and transparency: in-home respite needs and preferences of people living with dementia and their carers.信任、一致性与透明度:痴呆症患者及其照料者的居家喘息服务需求与偏好
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 8;5:1550729. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1550729. eCollection 2025.
2
Challenges to accessing community dementia care services: a qualitative study.获取社区痴呆症护理服务面临的挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 23;25(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12895-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of dementia family caregivers who use paid professional in-home respite care.使用付费专业居家暂托护理的痴呆症家庭照料者的特征。
Home Health Care Serv Q. 2022 Oct-Dec;41(4):310-329. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2022.2098083. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
2
Is it worth it? Carers' views and expectations of residential respite for people living with dementia during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后,对于照顾痴呆症患者的护理人员来说,入住提供短暂住宿和护理服务的疗养院是否值得?他们对此的看法和期望如何?
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;37(2). doi: 10.1002/gps.5680.
3
'The time has come': reflections on the 'tipping point' in deciding on a care home move.
“时机已到”:对决定入住养老院这一“转折点”的反思。
Aging Ment Health. 2022 Sep;26(9):1855-1861. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1947963. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
4
Life under lockdown and social restrictions - the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.封控和社交限制下的生活——英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间痴呆症患者及其照护者的经历。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 10;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02257-z.
5
Synthesis of the Literature: Variables Influencing Caregiver Use or Nonuse of Supportive Services.文献综述:影响照顾者使用或不使用支持性服务的变量
SAGE Open Nurs. 2019 May 3;5:2377960819838411. doi: 10.1177/2377960819838411. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
6
Professionals' views on the "optimal time" for people living with dementia to move to a care home.专业人士对痴呆症患者搬入养老院的“最佳时间”的看法。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;36(1):136-142. doi: 10.1002/gps.5405. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
7
Adapting Andersen's expanded behavioral model of health services use to include older adults receiving long-term services and supports.将 Andersen 的扩展行为模型应用于健康服务利用,以包括接受长期服务和支持的老年人。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1405-7.
8
Critical appraisal of qualitative research: necessity, partialities and the issue of bias.定性研究的批判性评价:必要性、偏好与偏差问题
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Feb;25(1):9-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111132. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Barriers and enablers in the use of respite interventions by caregivers of people with dementia: an integrative review.痴呆症患者照料者使用喘息干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项综合综述
Arch Public Health. 2018 Nov 22;76:72. doi: 10.1186/s13690-018-0316-y. eCollection 2018.
10
Respite in Dementia: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.痴呆症中的暂息:一个进化概念分析。
Dementia (London). 2019 May;18(4):1446-1465. doi: 10.1177/1471301217715325. Epub 2017 Jun 28.