Wedd Laura, Gleeson Margaret, Meiser Bettina, O'Shea Rosie, Barlow-Stewart Kristine, Spurdle Amanda B, James Paul, Fleming Jane, Nichols Cassandra, Austin Rachel, Cops Elisa, Monnik Melissa, Do Judy, Kaur Rajneesh
School of Clinical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Centre for Population Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Darlinghurst, Australia.
J Community Genet. 2023 Jun;14(3):307-317. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00644-0. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
The complexity of genetic variant interpretation means that a proportion of individuals who undergo genetic testing for a hereditary cancer syndrome will have their test result reclassified over time. Such a reclassification may involve a clinically significant upgrade or downgrade in pathogenicity, which may have significant implications for medical management. To date, few studies have examined the psychosocial impact of a reclassification in a hereditary cancer syndrome context. To address this gap, semi-structured telephone interviews were performed with eighteen individuals who had a BRCA1, BRCA2 or Lynch syndrome-related (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) gene variant reclassified. The interviews were analysed utilising an inductive, qualitative approach and emergent themes were identified by thematic analysis. Variable levels of recall amongst participants were found. Common motivations for initial testing included a significant personal and/or family history of cancer and a desire to "find an answer". No individual whose uncertain result was upgraded reported negative psychosocial outcomes; most reported adapting to their reclassified result and appraised their genetic testing experience positively. However, individuals whose likely pathogenic/pathogenic results were downgraded reported feelings of anger, shock and sadness post reclassification, highlighting that additional psychosocial support may be required for some. Genetic counselling issues and recommendations for clinical practice are outlined.
基因变异解读的复杂性意味着,一部分接受遗传性癌症综合征基因检测的个体,其检测结果会随着时间推移而重新分类。这种重新分类可能涉及致病性在临床上显著的升级或降级,这可能对医疗管理产生重大影响。迄今为止,很少有研究探讨在遗传性癌症综合征背景下重新分类对心理社会的影响。为了填补这一空白,我们对18名BRCA1、BRCA2或林奇综合征相关(MLH1、MSH2、MSH6或PMS2)基因变异被重新分类的个体进行了半结构化电话访谈。访谈采用归纳性定性方法进行分析,并通过主题分析确定了新出现的主题。研究发现参与者的回忆程度各不相同。最初进行检测的常见动机包括有重大的个人和/或家族癌症病史以及“找到答案”的愿望。没有一个不确定结果被升级的个体报告有负面的心理社会结果;大多数人报告说适应了重新分类的结果,并对他们的基因检测经历给予了积极评价。然而,可能致病/致病结果被降级的个体在重新分类后报告了愤怒、震惊和悲伤的情绪,这表明一些人可能需要额外的心理社会支持。文中概述了遗传咨询问题及对临床实践的建议。