• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The resident experience with psychological safety during interprofessional critical event debriefings.住院医师在跨专业重大事件汇报期间的心理安全感体验。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Apr 1;7(2):e10864. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10864. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Interprofessional clinical event debriefing-does it make a difference? Attitudes of emergency department care providers to INFO clinical event debriefings.跨专业临床事件汇报——有区别吗?急诊医护人员对 INFO 临床事件汇报的态度。
CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):695-701. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00361-6. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
3
The community of inquiry framework for virtual team-to-team debriefings during interprofessional trauma simulations.跨专业创伤模拟期间虚拟团队间汇报的探究共同体框架
Global Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s44186-022-00013-4. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
4
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Does a Written Tool to Guide Structured Debriefing Improve Discourse? Implications for Interprofessional Team Simulation.书面工具引导结构化讨论是否能提高讨论效果?对跨专业团队模拟的启示。
J Surg Educ. 2018 Nov;75(6):e240-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
6
Debriefing the Interprofessional Team in Medical Simulation医学模拟中的跨专业团队汇报
7
Interprofessional team debriefings with or without an instructor after a simulated crisis scenario: An exploratory case study.模拟危机情景后有或没有教员参与的跨专业团队汇报:一项探索性案例研究
J Interprof Care. 2016 Nov;30(6):717-725. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1181616. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Characteristics of Real-Time, Non-Critical Incident Debriefing Practices in the Emergency Department.急诊科实时非关键事件汇报实践的特点。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):146-151. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31467. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Challenges of interprofessional team training: a qualitative analysis of residents' perceptions.跨专业团队培训的挑战:对住院医师认知的定性分析
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2015 Jan-Apr;28(1):52-7. doi: 10.4103/1357-6283.161883.
10
Owning the Trauma Bay: Teaching Trauma Resuscitation to Emergency Medicine Residents and Nurses through In-situ Simulation.掌控创伤治疗区:通过现场模拟向急诊医学住院医师和护士传授创伤复苏技能
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 15;5(4):S108-S148. doi: 10.21980/J8WK9X. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Job insecurity, psychological safety, work alienation, and anxiety in the hotel industry: a moderated-mediated analyses.酒店业中的工作不安全感、心理安全感、工作疏离感与焦虑:一项有调节的中介分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 13;16:1615426. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1615426. eCollection 2025.
2
Group Feedback for Faculty: Turning the Wheels of Change.给教师的集体反馈:推动变革之轮
ATS Sch. 2023 Sep 29;4(3):247-249. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0059ED. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing Learning and Creativity: Understanding Psychological Safety in Simulation-Based Learning.最大化学习与创造力:理解基于模拟学习中的心理安全感
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):5-14. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.定性数据分析的主题分析:AMEE 指南第 131 号。
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
A systematic review of factors that enable psychological safety in healthcare teams.对医疗团队中促进心理安全的因素的系统评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):240-250. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa025.
4
Understanding Debriefing: A Qualitative Study of Event Reconstruction at an Academic Medical Center.理解汇报:对学术医疗中心事件重建的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1089-1097. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002999.
5
Exploring the Construct of Psychological Safety in Medical Education.探索医学教育中的心理安全感构建。
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S28-S35. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002897.
6
Learning Conversations: An Analysis of the Theoretical Roots and Their Manifestations of Feedback and Debriefing in Medical Education.学习对话:医学教育中反馈和反思的理论根源及其表现形式分析。
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):1020-1025. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002932.
7
Psychological safety on the healthcare team.医疗团队中的心理安全感。
Nurs Manage. 2019 Aug;50(8):32-38. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000558490.12760.08.
8
Failure to Debrief after Critical Events in Anesthesia Is Associated with Failures in Communication during the Event.在麻醉关键事件后未能进行汇报与事件过程中的沟通失败有关。
Anesthesiology. 2019 Jun;130(6):1039-1048. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002649.
9
Embracing the tension between vulnerability and credibility: 'intellectual candour' in health professions education.拥抱脆弱性和可信度之间的紧张关系:健康职业教育中的“知性坦诚”。
Med Educ. 2019 Jan;53(1):32-41. doi: 10.1111/medu.13649. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
10
Does Psychological Safety Impact the Clinical Learning Environment for Resident Physicians? Results From the VA's Learners' Perceptions Survey.心理安全感会影响住院医师的临床学习环境吗?来自退伍军人事务部学习者认知调查的结果。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):699-707. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00719.1.

住院医师在跨专业重大事件汇报期间的心理安全感体验。

The resident experience with psychological safety during interprofessional critical event debriefings.

作者信息

Hitchner Lily, Yore Mackensie, Burk Charney, Mason Jessica, Sawtelle Vohra Stacy

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine UCSF Fresno Medical Education Program Fresno California USA.

UCLA National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Emergency Medicine Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center California Los Angeles USA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2023 Apr 1;7(2):e10864. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10864. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.10864
PMID:37013133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10066498/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Interprofessional feedback and teamwork skills training are important in graduate medical education. Critical event debriefing is a unique interprofessional team training opportunity in the emergency department. While potentially educational, these varied, high-stakes events can threaten psychological safety for learners. This is a qualitative study of emergency medicine resident physicians' experience of interprofessional feedback during critical event debriefing to characterize factors that impact their psychological safety.

METHODS

The authors conduced semistructured interviews with resident physicians who were the physician team leader during a critical event debriefing. Interviews were coded and themes were generated using a general inductive approach and concepts from social ecological theory.

RESULTS

Eight residents were interviewed. The findings suggest that cultivating a safe learning environment for residents during debriefings involves the following: (1) allowing space for validating statements, (2) supporting strong interprofessional relationships, (3) providing structured opportunities for interprofessional learning, (4) encouraging attendings to model vulnerability, (5) standardizing the process of debriefing, (6) rejecting unprofessional behavior, and (7) creating the time and space for the process in the workplace.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the numerous intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional factors at play, educators should be sensitive to times when a resident cannot engage due to unaddressed threats to their psychological safety. Educators can address these threats in real time and over the course of a resident's training to enhance psychological safety and the potential educational impact of critical event debriefing.

摘要

目的

跨专业反馈和团队合作技能培训在毕业后医学教育中很重要。关键事件汇报是急诊科独特的跨专业团队培训机会。虽然这些多样化的高风险事件可能具有教育意义,但会威胁学习者的心理安全。这是一项关于急诊医学住院医师在关键事件汇报期间跨专业反馈体验的定性研究,旨在确定影响其心理安全的因素。

方法

作者对在关键事件汇报期间担任医师团队负责人的住院医师进行了半结构化访谈。使用一般归纳法和社会生态理论的概念对访谈进行编码并生成主题。

结果

对8名住院医师进行了访谈。研究结果表明,在汇报期间为住院医师营造安全的学习环境包括以下几点:(1)留出空间以确认陈述;(2)支持牢固的跨专业关系;(3)提供跨专业学习的结构化机会;(4)鼓励上级医师表现出易感性;(5)规范汇报流程;(6)抵制不专业行为;(7)在工作场所为该流程创造时间和空间。

结论

鉴于存在众多个人、人际和机构因素,教育工作者应敏锐意识到住院医师因心理安全受到未解决的威胁而无法参与的情况。教育工作者可以在住院医师培训期间实时应对这些威胁,以增强心理安全以及关键事件汇报的潜在教育影响。