• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最大化学习与创造力:理解基于模拟学习中的心理安全感

Maximizing Learning and Creativity: Understanding Psychological Safety in Simulation-Based Learning.

作者信息

Lateef Fatimah

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Duke NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):5-14. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19
PMID:32395043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7204954/
Abstract

Psychological safety refers to the belief that one can express oneself without fear of the negative consequences or feedback that their speech, comment, or action might generate. It is about the willingness of learners or workers in an organization, in expressing themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally. Psychological safety is very dynamic and will continue to evolve and change, with the interplay of a variety of external and internal factors affecting the individual, the organization, or the community. It is also closely linked to the culture in the organization, the institution, or the department. It has become a new norm, especially in high-frequency, high-intensity, and high-performance institutions and workplaces, that psychological safety must be mainstreamed and should not be just an incidental element. It also serves as a foundation for effective learning. When people feel safe and comfortable, they are more open to development, growth, and negotiating change. This is a current opinion piece by the author, who is the Director of The SingHealth Duke NUS Institute of Medical Simulation in Singapore. This is the largest and most comprehensive facility in Singapore, which is also the largest in South-East Asia. It has accreditation by the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. The paper is unique in sharing the perspectives of psychological safety in simulation-based education as well as many of the issues related to culture, which can trump strategy. Characteristics and attributes for facilitators, team training and dynamics, as well as the issue of power and hierarchy are also addressed.

摘要

心理安全是指相信一个人能够在无需担心其言语、评论或行为可能产生的负面后果或反馈的情况下表达自己。它关乎组织中学习者或工作者在身体、认知和情感方面表达自我的意愿。心理安全非常动态,会随着影响个人、组织或社区的各种外部和内部因素的相互作用而持续演变和变化。它还与组织、机构或部门的文化紧密相连。心理安全必须成为主流,而不应只是一个附带因素,这已成为一种新的常态,尤其是在高频、高强度和高性能的机构及工作场所。它也是有效学习的基础。当人们感到安全和舒适时,他们更愿意接受发展、成长并协商变革。这是作者撰写的一篇观点文章,作者是新加坡樟宜综合医院 - 杜克 - 国大医学模拟研究所所长。该研究所是新加坡最大、最全面的设施,也是东南亚最大的设施。它获得了医疗保健模拟协会的认证。本文的独特之处在于分享了基于模拟的教育中关于心理安全的观点以及许多与文化相关的问题,文化可能胜过战略。文中还讨论了促进者的特征和属性、团队培训与动态,以及权力和等级制度问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/bea896bd0c7e/JETS-13-5-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/6e205e4e0639/JETS-13-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/569e593adc95/JETS-13-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/bea896bd0c7e/JETS-13-5-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/6e205e4e0639/JETS-13-5-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/569e593adc95/JETS-13-5-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbcb/7204954/bea896bd0c7e/JETS-13-5-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Maximizing Learning and Creativity: Understanding Psychological Safety in Simulation-Based Learning.最大化学习与创造力:理解基于模拟学习中的心理安全感
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Jan-Mar;13(1):5-14. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_96_19. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
The 2019 WACEM Expert Document on the Framework for Setting up a Simulation Centre.2019年世界急诊医学联合会(WACEM)关于建立模拟中心框架的专家文件。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):232-242. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_102_19. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
Maintaining Confidentiality and Psychological Safety in Medical Simulation在医学模拟中保持保密性和心理安全
7
Academic Medicine Education Institute (AM·EI): Transforming the Educational Culture of Health Professionals.学术医学教育学会(AM·EI):转变卫生专业人员的教育文化。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2015 May;44(5):172-7.
8
Simulation Centers and Simulation-Based Education during the Time of COVID 19: A Multi-Center Best Practice Position Paper by the World Academic Council of Emergency Medicine.新冠疫情期间的模拟中心与基于模拟的教育:世界急诊医学学术理事会的多中心最佳实践立场文件
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):3-13. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_185_20. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Prelicensure nursing students' perspectives on video-assisted debriefing following high fidelity simulation: A qualitative study.护理专业学生在高仿真模拟后对视频辅助讨论的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Aug;79:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 7.
10
Enhancing the effectiveness of team debriefings in medical simulation: more best practices.提高医学模拟中团队汇报的有效性:更多最佳实践方法。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Mar;41(3):115-25. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41016-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The benefits and boundaries of psychological safety in simulation-based education: an integrative review.基于模拟的教育中心理安全的益处与界限:一项综合综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 15;24(1):922. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03575-y.
2
Factors associated with nursing students' satisfaction with simulation-based assessments: interaction between psychological safety and gender in a cross-sectional study.护理专业学生对基于模拟的评估满意度的相关因素:横断面研究中心理安全感与性别的相互作用
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):1051. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07648-z.
3
Nursing students' motivation for, and experiences from, participating in a blended intensive programme on mass casualty incidents: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
A new tool for assessing short debriefings after immersive simulation: validity of the SHORT scale.一种评估沉浸式模拟后简短汇报的新工具:SHORT 量表的效度。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1503-4.
2
Humble Leadership, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Follower Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation.谦逊领导、心理安全、知识共享与下属创造力:一项跨层次研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 19;9:1727. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01727. eCollection 2018.
3
Grace Under Pressure: Leadership in Emergency Medicine.
护理专业学生参与大规模伤亡事件混合强化课程的动机及体验:一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07425-y.
4
Use of machine learning to predict creativity among nurses: a multidisciplinary approach.运用机器学习预测护士的创造力:一种多学科方法。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 15;24(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03151-4.
5
Evaluating the use of BodyWorks Eve® high-fidelity ultrasound simulation equipment in formative clinical assessments.评估BodyWorks Eve®高保真超声模拟设备在形成性临床评估中的应用。
Ultrasound. 2025 Mar 12:1742271X251320549. doi: 10.1177/1742271X251320549.
6
What can simulation educators learn from the reluctant participant? An exploration of the factors influencing engagement amongst adult learners participating in paediatric simulation training.模拟教育工作者能从不情愿的参与者身上学到什么?对影响参与儿科模拟培训的成年学习者参与度的因素的探索。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Feb 13;10(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00331-9.
7
Decision-making during training of a Swedish navy command and control team: a quantitative study of workload effects.瑞典海军指挥与控制团队训练期间的决策制定:工作量影响的定量研究
Cogn Process. 2025 May;26(2):303-318. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
8
Virtual simulation training for postpartum hemorrhage in low-to-moderate-volume hospitals in the US.美国中低容量医院产后出血的虚拟模拟培训
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 May 21;4(3):100357. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100357. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Simulation-based education as a provider of fieldwork insights - experiences of ambulance nurse specialist students.基于模拟的教育作为实地工作见解的提供者——救护专科护士学生的经历
BMC Nurs. 2023 Dec 19;22(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01666-2.
10
Effects of simulation in improving the self-confidence of student nurses in clinical practice: a systematic review.模拟教学对提高护生临床实习自信心的效果:系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 30;23(1):815. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04793-1.
压力之下的优雅:急诊医学中的领导力
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):73-79. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_18_18.
4
Bad manners in the Emergency Department: Incivility among doctors.急诊科的不礼貌行为:医生之间的不文明行为。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0194933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194933. eCollection 2018.
5
Operationalizing Healthcare Simulation Psychological Safety: A Descriptive Analysis of an Intervention.实施医疗保健模拟中的心理安全:一项干预措施的描述性分析
Simul Healthc. 2017 Oct;12(5):289-297. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000253.
6
Risky Business: Psychological Safety and the Risks of Learning Medicine.风险行为:心理安全感与医学学习的风险
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):780-782. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00549.1.
7
Does Psychological Safety Impact the Clinical Learning Environment for Resident Physicians? Results From the VA's Learners' Perceptions Survey.心理安全感会影响住院医师的临床学习环境吗?来自退伍军人事务部学习者认知调查的结果。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):699-707. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00719.1.
8
The effects of power, leadership and psychological safety on resident event reporting.权力、领导力和心理安全感对住院医师事件报告的影响。
Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):343-50. doi: 10.1111/medu.12947.
9
Experiences of Psychological Distress and Sources of Stress and Support During Medical Training: a Survey of Medical Students.医学培训期间的心理困扰经历、压力来源及支持来源:一项医学生调查
Acad Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;40(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0395-9. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
10
Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting.基于模拟训练及其他场景下的情况介绍与总结汇报:内容、结构、态度及场景
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Mar;29(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 28.