• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病因还是疗法:是什么让我们将注意力问题视为疾病?

Causes or Cures: What makes us think of attention issues as disorders?

作者信息

De Block Andreas, Dewitte Siegfried, Hens Kristien

机构信息

Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Kardinaal Mercierplein 2 - box 3200, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Marketing, Leuven, Naamsestraat 69 - box 3545, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

New Ideas Psychol. 2023 Apr;69:None. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101008.

DOI:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101008
PMID:37013181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028460/
Abstract

Are attention issues disorders or not? Philosophers of medicine have tried to address this question by looking for properties that distinguish disorders from non-disorders. Such properties include deviation of a statistical norm, a loss of function or experienced suffering. However, attempts at such conceptual analysis have not led to a consensus on the necessary and sufficient conditions for the application of the concept of disorder. Recently, philosophers have proposed an experimental approach to investigate in which circumstances people think a specific concept is applicable. Here we present a quantitative vignette study investigating whether disorder attribution depends on the perceived cause and the perceived type of treatment for an attention problem. The results of our study indicate that the attribution of a disorder decreased when the attention problem was understood as caused by bullying (social environmental cause) or by an accident (non-social environmental cause) rather than a genetic cause. When prescribed a pill, attention problems were considered a disorder to a larger extent than when the child was prescribed an environmental treatment. Our study also suggests that whereas successful environmental treatments will not necessarily decrease the disorder attribution, successful pharmacological treatments will decrease the likelihood that a person is thought to still suffer from a disorder after receiving the treatment.

摘要

注意力问题究竟是不是疾病?医学哲学家们试图通过寻找能区分疾病与非疾病的特征来回答这个问题。这些特征包括偏离统计规范、功能丧失或经历痛苦。然而,此类概念分析的尝试并未就疾病概念应用的必要和充分条件达成共识。最近,哲学家们提出了一种实验方法来研究在哪些情况下人们认为某个特定概念适用。在此,我们展示一项定量的情景描述研究,探究疾病归因是否取决于对注意力问题的感知原因和感知治疗类型。我们的研究结果表明,当注意力问题被认为是由欺凌(社会环境原因)或事故(非社会环境原因)而非基因原因导致时,疾病归因会减少。当开了药时,注意力问题比孩子接受环境治疗时更被认为是一种疾病。我们的研究还表明,虽然成功的环境治疗不一定会减少疾病归因,但成功的药物治疗会降低人们在接受治疗后仍被认为患有疾病的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/080c67331493/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/e2576ea1346c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/28dc1f863b1c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/bd2b6069e494/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/080c67331493/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/e2576ea1346c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/28dc1f863b1c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/bd2b6069e494/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a22/10028460/080c67331493/fx1.jpg

相似文献

1
Causes or Cures: What makes us think of attention issues as disorders?病因还是疗法:是什么让我们将注意力问题视为疾病?
New Ideas Psychol. 2023 Apr;69:None. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101008.
2
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
5
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
[The Gulf War Syndrome twenty years on].二十年后的海湾战争综合征
Encephale. 2013 Oct;39(5):332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Right care, first time: a highly personalised and measurement-based care model to manage youth mental health.精准医疗,首次就诊:高度个性化和基于评估的青少年心理健康管理医疗模式。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211 Suppl 9:S3-S46. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50383.
10
请你提供一下具体的原文内容呀,这样我才能准确地翻译为中文。

引用本文的文献

1
What are Mental Disorders? Exploring the Role of Culture in the Harmful Dysfunction Approach.什么是精神障碍?探究文化在有害功能障碍方法中的作用。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2024 Dec;58(4):1048-1063. doi: 10.1007/s12124-024-09837-9. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Prolonged Grief Disorder Diagnostic Criteria-Helping Those With Maladaptive Grief Responses.持续性悲伤障碍诊断标准——帮助那些有适应不良悲伤反应的人。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):277-278. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4201.
2
A plea for an experimental philosophy of medicine.对医学实验哲学的呼吁。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):81-89. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09551-2. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
3
Experimental philosophy of medicine and the concepts of health and disease.医学实验哲学与健康和疾病的概念。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2021 Aug;42(3-4):169-186. doi: 10.1007/s11017-021-09550-3. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Biological normativity: a new hope for naturalism?生物规范性:自然主义的新希望?
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Jun;24(2):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09993-w. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
What Makes Some Diseases More Typical than Others? A Survey on the Impact of Disease Characteristics and Professional Background on Disease Typicality.是什么让某些疾病比其他疾病更具典型性?一项关于疾病特征和专业背景对疾病典型性影响的调查。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020972813. doi: 10.1177/0046958020972813.
6
Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断、评估和治疗临床实践指南。
Pediatrics. 2019 Oct;144(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-2528.
7
Resourcefulness of an empirically informed and thickly normative account of disease.基于经验且高度规范性的疾病描述的足智多谋。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Sep;45(9):589-590. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105555. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
8
What's All the Hysteria About? A Modern Perspective on Functional Neurological Disorders.这场歇斯底里是怎么回事?对功能性神经障碍的现代视角。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 15;85(2):e3-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.11.003.
9
Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Disorders.精神病理学的生物医学解释及其对精神障碍相关态度和信念的影响。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:555-577. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095416. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
10
Do mental health professionals use diagnostic classifications the way we think they do? A global survey.心理健康专业人员使用诊断分类的方式是我们所认为的那样吗?一项全球调查。
World Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;17(2):187-195. doi: 10.1002/wps.20525.