• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮微创脊柱手术技能的家庭连续性训练对技能保持的效果。

The effect of continuous at-home training of minimally invasive surgical skills on skill retention.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center - Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10 route 618, Nijmegen, 6500HB, The Netherlands.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8307-8315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09277-9. Epub 2022 May 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-022-09277-9
PMID:35604482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9125971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Skill deterioration of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) skills may be prevented by continuous training. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether unsupervised continuous at-home training of MIS skills results in better skill retention compared to no training.

METHODS

Medical doctors followed a two-week interval training for two MIS tasks (precise peg transfer and interrupted suture with knot tying), ending with a baseline test. They were randomly assigned to the no-practice group or continuous-practice group. The latter practiced unsupervised at home every two weeks during the study period. Skill retention was measured after three and six months on both tasks by the total time needed, distance traveled by instruments and LS-CAT score (8 best possible score and > 40 worst score).

RESULTS

A total of 38 participants were included. No significant differences in performance were found at pre-test or baseline. At six months the no-practice group needed more time for the suturing task (309 s vs. 196 s at baseline, p = 0.010) and the LS-CAT score was significantly worse (30 vs. 20 at baseline, p < 0.0001). The continuous-practice group performed the suturing task significantly better than the no-practice group at both three and six months (17 vs. 25, p < 0.001 and 17 vs. 30, p < 0.001) and faster as well (p = 0.034 and p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a skill decay after only a few months of non-use and shows better skill retention after continuous unsupervised at-home practice of MIS skills. This indicates an added value of regular at-home practice of surgical skills.

摘要

背景

微创外科(MIS)技能的熟练程度可能会因持续训练而得到提高。本研究旨在评估 MIS 技能的非监督持续家庭训练是否比不训练更能更好地保持技能。

方法

医生们进行了为期两周的间隔训练,共进行了两项 MIS 任务(精确的销钉转移和间断缝合打结),最后进行了基线测试。他们被随机分配到无练习组或连续练习组。后者在研究期间每两周在家进行一次非监督练习。在三个月和六个月时,通过总用时、器械行驶距离和 LS-CAT 评分(8 分为最佳,>40 分为最差)测量两项任务的技能保持情况。

结果

共有 38 名参与者被纳入研究。在预测试或基线时,两组的表现没有显著差异。在六个月时,无练习组在缝合任务中需要更多的时间(309 秒 vs. 196 秒,p=0.010),LS-CAT 评分也明显更差(30 分 vs. 基线时的 20 分,p<0.0001)。在三个月和六个月时,连续练习组在缝合任务中的表现均明显优于无练习组(17 分 vs. 25 分,p<0.001 和 17 分 vs. 30 分,p<0.001),用时也更短(p=0.034 和 p=0.001)。

结论

本研究表明,仅几个月不使用就会导致技能衰退,并显示出在 MIS 技能的持续非监督家庭练习后,技能保持更好。这表明定期进行手术技能的家庭练习具有附加价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/d1a8b16ccd36/464_2022_9277_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/586b880bbc74/464_2022_9277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/610cc1ec009b/464_2022_9277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/63464abf2456/464_2022_9277_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/d1a8b16ccd36/464_2022_9277_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/586b880bbc74/464_2022_9277_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/610cc1ec009b/464_2022_9277_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/63464abf2456/464_2022_9277_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d946/9613562/d1a8b16ccd36/464_2022_9277_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of continuous at-home training of minimally invasive surgical skills on skill retention.经皮微创脊柱手术技能的家庭连续性训练对技能保持的效果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8307-8315. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09277-9. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
The feasibility and benefit of unsupervised at-home training of minimally invasive surgical skills.非监督式居家微创外科技能训练的可行性和益处。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jan;37(1):180-188. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09424-2. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Intracorporal knot tying techniques - which is the right one?体内打结技术——哪种才是正确的?
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Apr;52(4):633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.049. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
4
Experts in Minimally Invasive Surgery are Outperformed by Trained Novices on Suturing Skills.微创手术专家在缝合技能方面逊于经过训练的新手。
J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:540-546. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.042. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
5
New models for advanced laparoscopic suturing: taking it to the next level.先进腹腔镜缝合的新模型:迈向新高度。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):581-587. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4242-6. Epub 2015 May 28.
6
Enhancing cosmetic suturing skill acquisition in surgical residents through spaced learning training: a randomized controlled trial.通过间隔学习训练提高外科住院医师的美容缝合技能习得:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2363940. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2363940. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
7
Intracorporal suturing--driving license necessary?体内缝合——需要驾驶证吗?
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;49(7):1138-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.018. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
8
Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents' compliance and reflection.基于自愿自主模拟器的微创手术培训、住院医师的依从性和反思。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;69(4):564-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.04.011.
9
Assessment of Surgeon Performance of Advanced Open Surgical Skills Using a Microskills-Based Novel Curriculum.使用基于微技能的新型课程评估外科医生的高级开放手术技能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229787. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29787.
10
Development of proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum for otolaryngology residents: A pilot study.基于能力的耳鼻喉科住院医师打结和缝合课程的开发:一项试点研究。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2020 Apr;47(2):291-298. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery and technical skill decay.手术及技术技能衰退。
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3399-3413. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002313.
2
Comparison of laparoscopic performance using low-cost laparoscopy simulators versus state-of-the-art simulators: a multi-center prospective, randomized crossover trial.使用低成本腹腔镜模拟器与最先进模拟器的腹腔镜操作性能比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机交叉试验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):2016-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11531-9. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
3
Comparison of distance versus in-person laparoscopy training using a low-cost laparoscopy simulator-a randomized controlled multi-center trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review.新冠疫情时代下的医学与外科教育挑战和创新:一项系统性回顾。
In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11950.
2
Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on surgical practice - Part 1.冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行对外科实践的影响 - 第 1 部分。
Int J Surg. 2020 Jul;79:168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Editorial. Innovations in neurosurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: is it time to reexamine our neurosurgical training models?
使用低成本腹腔镜模拟器进行远程与面对面腹腔镜培训的比较:一项随机对照多中心试验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6527-6540. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11069-2. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
4
Barriers to diffusion and implementation of pediatric minimally invasive surgery in Brazil.巴西小儿微创外科推广和实施的障碍。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05897-y.
5
Objective assessment for open surgical suturing training by finger tracking can discriminate novices from experts.手指跟踪的开放式外科缝合训练的客观评估可以区分新手和专家。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2198818. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2198818.
社论。2019冠状病毒病大流行期间神经外科教育的创新:是时候重新审视我们的神经外科培训模式了吗?
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 17;133(1):14-15. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.JNS201012. Print 2020 Jul 1.
4
Emergency Restructuring of a General Surgery Residency Program During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: The University of Washington Experience.新冠肺炎疫情期间普通外科住院医师培训计划的紧急重组:华盛顿大学的经验。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):624-627. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1219.
5
Competency assessment tool for laparoscopic suturing: development and reliability evaluation.腹腔镜缝合操作能力评估工具:开发与可靠性评估
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2947-2953. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07077-2. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
6
Construct validity of eoSim - a low-cost and portable laparoscopic simulator.eoSim的结构效度——一种低成本便携式腹腔镜模拟器
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020 Oct;29(5):261-268. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1638411. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
7
Construct, content and face validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator on advanced suturing tasks.高级缝合任务中 eoSim 腹腔镜模拟器的构建、内容和表面有效性。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3635-3643. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06652-3. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
Barriers and facilitators to deliberate practice using take-home laparoscopic simulators.使用可带回家的腹腔镜模拟器进行刻意练习的障碍和促进因素。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2951-2959. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6599-9. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Improved laparoscopic skills in gynaecology trainees following a simulation-training program using take-home box trainers.在使用可带回家的箱式训练器的模拟训练项目后,妇科实习生的腹腔镜技能得到提高。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Feb;59(1):110-116. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12802. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
10
Systematic Review of Voluntary Participation in Simulation-Based Laparoscopic Skills Training: Motivators and Barriers for Surgical Trainee Attendance.基于模拟的腹腔镜技能培训中自愿参与的系统评价:外科实习生参与的动机和障碍
J Surg Educ. 2017 Mar-Apr;74(2):306-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Nov 9.