• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗后支持性护理的组织和提供:幸存者的偏好——综合评价。

Survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care after treatment: An integrative review.

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1P8; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Suite 130, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 1P8.

出版信息

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:102040. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102040. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102040
PMID:34571444
Abstract

PURPOSE

Quality supportive care during cancer survivorship contributes to positive physical and psychosocial health. However, the potential positive impacts are influenced by survivors' perceptions of and ability to access the supportive care services that they deem important to their well-being. The purpose of this integrative review was to examine cancer survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care services in the post-treatment period.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search for relevant quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. Included studies were analyzed using directed content analysis, focused on models of care and type of provider, site of care, specialized services, structural supports through transitions, and sources of information.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies were included. Overall, survivors' preferences are not static and fluctuate over time based on their perceived health needs, concerns and points of transition in care. While specialist supportive care led by consultant oncologists is often identified as the preferred model of care, survivors' also express preferences for integrated and shared models of care, involving oncology nurses, primary care and multidisciplinary professionals to optimise coordination and impact of supportive care. Flexibility in care delivery, leveraging technology and expertise, was preferred to ensure convenient and timely access to supportive care.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer survivors express preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care in the post-treatment phase that fluctuate based on their perceived health needs. The development of novel survivorship health services must consider survivors' preferences and allow flexibility in care delivery to facilitate engagement, uptake, and effectiveness.

摘要

目的

癌症生存者在癌症康复期间接受高质量的支持性护理有助于促进其身体和心理的健康。然而,这些支持性护理服务的潜在积极影响受到生存者对其认为对自身福祉重要的支持性护理服务的看法和获取能力的影响。本综述的目的是探讨癌症生存者在治疗后阶段对支持性护理服务的组织和提供方式的偏好。

方法

我们对相关的定量、定性和混合方法研究进行了系统搜索。使用有针对性的内容分析对纳入的研究进行分析,重点关注护理模式和提供者类型、护理地点、专门服务、通过过渡提供的结构支持以及信息来源。

结果

共纳入 69 项研究。总体而言,生存者的偏好不是静态的,而是根据其感知到的健康需求、关注点和护理过渡点的变化而波动。虽然由肿瘤专家主导的专科支持性护理通常被认为是首选的护理模式,但生存者也表达了对整合和共享护理模式的偏好,涉及肿瘤护士、初级保健和多学科专业人员,以优化支持性护理的协调和效果。护理提供的灵活性,利用技术和专业知识,更便于获得支持性护理。

结论

癌症生存者在治疗后阶段对支持性护理的组织和提供方式表达了偏好,这些偏好会根据其感知到的健康需求而波动。新的生存者健康服务的发展必须考虑到生存者的偏好,并允许护理提供的灵活性,以促进参与、接受和效果。

相似文献

1
Survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care after treatment: An integrative review.治疗后支持性护理的组织和提供:幸存者的偏好——综合评价。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:102040. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102040. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
2
Childhood cancer survivorship: barriers and preferences.儿童癌症生存者:障碍和偏好。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Nov;12(e5):e687-e695. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002001. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Understanding Long-Term Cancer Survivors' Preferences for Ongoing Medical Care.了解长期癌症幸存者对持续医疗护理的偏好。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Oct;34(10):2091-2097. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05189-y. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
4
Colorectal cancer survivors' quality of life: a qualitative study of unmet need.结直肠癌幸存者的生活质量:对未满足需求的定性研究
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2020 Jun 29. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002190.
5
Optimizing Survivorship Care Services for Asian Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.优化亚洲青少年及青年癌症生存者的生存关怀服务:一项定性研究。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Jun;9(3):384-393. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0145. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
6
How should the healthcare system support cancer survivors? Survivors' and health professionals' expectations and perception on comprehensive cancer survivorship care in Korea: a qualitative study.医疗体系应如何为癌症幸存者提供支持?韩国一项定性研究调查了癌症幸存者及其卫生保健专业人员对综合癌症生存护理的期望和看法。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11736-y.
7
The role of routine follow-up visits of prostate cancer survivors in addressing supportive care and information needs: a qualitative observational study.前列腺癌幸存者常规随访在满足支持性护理和信息需求方面的作用:一项定性观察性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6449-6457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06222-9. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
8
Follow-Up Care Provider Preferences of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors.青少年和青年癌症幸存者的随访护理提供者偏好。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018 Apr;7(2):204-209. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0083. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
9
Canadian Resources, Programs, and Models of Care to Support Cancer Survivors' Transition beyond Treatment: A Scoping Review.加拿大支持癌症幸存者治疗后过渡的资源、项目和护理模式:范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jun 9;28(3):2134-2145. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030198.
10
The Role of Primary Care Physicians in Childhood Cancer Survivorship Care: Multiperspective Interviews.初级保健医生在儿童癌症生存者护理中的作用:多视角访谈。
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):710-719. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0103. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Perspectives on Technological Barriers and Implementation Strategies Leveraged During a Real-World Remote Symptom Monitoring Program.患者对现实世界远程症状监测项目中技术障碍及实施策略的看法
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jun;9:e2400232. doi: 10.1200/CCI-24-00232. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
2
"One Size Doesn't Fit All": Nutrition Care Needs in Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Survivors-A Qualitative Study.“一刀切并不适用于所有人”:食管癌和胃癌幸存者的营养护理需求——一项定性研究
Nutrients. 2025 May 2;17(9):1567. doi: 10.3390/nu17091567.
3
Digital and nurse-led support intervention in primary care during the first year after curative intent treatment for breast or prostate cancer: study protocol of two cluster randomised controlled pilot trials.
乳腺癌或前列腺癌根治性治疗后第一年在初级保健中进行的数字化和护士主导的支持干预:两项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e090848. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090848.
4
Preferences of Cancer Survivors for Follow-Up Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.癌症幸存者对后续护理的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
Patient. 2025 Mar;18(2):115-129. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00722-6. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
5
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.评估患者在医疗保健环境中经历的过渡质量的报告测量的内容效度:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.
6
Survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer: MASCC-ASCO standards and practice recommendations.晚期或转移性癌症患者的生存护理:MASCC-ASCO 标准和实践建议。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Apr 29;32(5):313. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08465-8.
7
Availability of cancer survivorship support services across the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program network.国家癌症研究所社区肿瘤学研究计划网络中癌症生存支持服务的可及性。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Jan 4;8(1). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae005.
8
Quality in care requires kindness and flexibility - a hermeneutic-phenomenological study of patients' experiences from pathways including transitions across healthcare settings.关爱质量需要善良和灵活性——包括跨越医疗保健环境的转变在内的途径中患者体验的解释学-现象学研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10545-8.
9
Preferences on Delivery of Cancer Rehabilitation Services for Cancer-Related Disability Among Older Individuals Surviving Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.老年乳腺癌幸存者对癌症相关残疾的癌症康复服务提供方式的偏好:一项定性研究
Rehabil Oncol. 2023 Jul;41(3):139-148. doi: 10.1097/01.reo.0000000000000341. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
10
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service.一项针对多学科呼吸困难支持服务试点的混合方法评估。
Eval Rev. 2023 Oct;47(5):820-870. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231162402. Epub 2023 Apr 4.