• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Repliscan系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):695-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.695-699.1978.
2
Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的复制扫描系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):58-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.58-61.1981.
3
Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Repliscan II系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):408-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.408-410.1981.
4
Evaluation of the enterotube system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌成员的肠管系统评估。
Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jul;22(1):96-9. doi: 10.1128/am.22.1.96-99.1971.
5
Evaluation of API 20E System and Encise Enterotube for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae of animal origin.评估API 20E系统和EnCise肠杆菌鉴定管对动物源肠杆菌科细菌的鉴定能力。
Can J Comp Med. 1980 Jul;44(3):315-9.
6
A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.两种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的商业方法(API 20E和Enterotube)与传统方法的比较。
J Clin Pathol. 1976 Feb;29(2):158-61. doi: 10.1136/jcp.29.2.158.
7
Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.自动微生物鉴定系统与API、肠杆菌鉴定管、微量鉴定系统、微量培养基系统以及用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的传统方法的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Nov;12(5):659-62. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.5.659-662.1980.
8
Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.评估Vitek GNI+和贝克顿·迪金森微生物系统Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对肠杆菌科成员及其他革兰氏阴性、葡萄糖发酵和非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的鉴定能力。
J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3269-73. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3269-3273.1997.
9
Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.使用自动细菌鉴定仪IDX系统快速鉴定肠杆菌科细菌和非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌。
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Feb;19(2):301-2. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.2.301-302.1984.
10
Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.自动微生物系统肠杆菌科生化卡的临床实验室评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):370-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.370-375.1981.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coil among pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms with different in-feed medication policies in Ontario and British Columbia.安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省47个采用不同饲料添加药物政策的全程养殖猪场中猪粪便大肠埃希菌的抗菌药物耐药性流行情况及模式
Can J Vet Res. 2008;72(2):195-201.
2
Antibiotic resistance associated with inositol metabolism in salmonellae from ontario cattle.安大略省牛源沙门氏菌中与肌醇代谢相关的抗生素耐药性
Can Vet J. 1985 Aug;26(8):251-3.
3
Yield of vancomycin-resistant enterococci and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae from stools submitted for Clostridium difficile testing compared to results from a focused surveillance program.与重点监测项目的结果相比,提交进行艰难梭菌检测的粪便样本中耐万古霉素肠球菌和多重耐药肠杆菌科细菌的检出率。
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(3):1152-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1152-1154.2001.
4
Measurement of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in pig feces with a hydrophobic grid membrane filter interpreter system.使用疏水网格膜过滤解读系统测定猪粪便中耐抗菌药的大肠杆菌
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Jan;64(1):366-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.1.366-369.1998.
5
Drug resistance and biochemical characteristics of Salmonella from turkeys.火鸡源沙门氏菌的耐药性及生化特性
Can J Vet Res. 1995 Oct;59(4):241-8.
6
Characterization of Salmonella enteritidis strains.肠炎沙门氏菌菌株的特性分析
Can J Vet Res. 1993 Jul;57(3):176-84.
7
Comparison of Enteric-Tek with API 20E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.Enteric-Tek与API 20E及传统方法用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Jan;15(1):16-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.1.16-18.1982.
8
Evaluation of the Repliscan II System for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Repliscan II系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):408-10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.408-410.1981.
9
Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.自动微生物系统肠杆菌科生化卡的临床实验室评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Oct;14(4):370-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.370-375.1981.
10
Evaluation of the repliscan system for Enterobacteriaceae identification.用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的复制扫描系统评估
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):58-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.58-61.1981.

本文引用的文献

1
Biochemical identification of hospital enterobacteria by replica agar plating.通过影印琼脂平板法对医院肠道细菌进行生化鉴定。
Can J Microbiol. 1974 Dec;20(12):1653-64. doi: 10.1139/m74-257.
2
Analysis of cost and accuracy of alternative strategies for Enterobacteriaceae identification.肠杆菌科细菌鉴定替代策略的成本与准确性分析
J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Apr;3(4):421-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.3.4.421-424.1976.
3
Laboratory approaches to the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Hum Pathol. 1976 Mar;7(2):151-9. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(76)80018-4.

用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的Repliscan系统评估

Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

作者信息

Brown S D, Washington J A

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1978 Dec;8(6):695-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.8.6.695-699.1978.

DOI:10.1128/jcm.8.6.695-699.1978
PMID:370143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC275326/
Abstract

The Repliscan system, a semiautomated method for identifying gram-negative bacilli, was evaluated for its potential usefulness in clinical microbiology laboratories. A total of 1,877 isolates, including 1,712 fermentative and 165 nonfermentative organisms, were tested in parallel with the Repliscan and Enterotube methods of enteric identification. Discrepancies were retested in each system as well as with conventional methods. The Repliscan method correctly identified 91%, misidentified 2%, and failed to identify 7% of the fermentative orgamisms tested. Of the genera under study, Enterobacter posed the greatest problem to the system in terms of overall identification rates. The Repliscan appears to be an efficient, economic, and effective laboratory tool for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

摘要

Repliscan系统是一种用于鉴定革兰氏阴性杆菌的半自动方法,该系统在临床微生物实验室中的潜在用途得到了评估。总共1877株分离菌,包括1712株发酵菌和165株非发酵菌,同时采用Repliscan和肠管法进行肠道菌鉴定测试。每个系统以及传统方法对存在差异的结果都进行了重新测试。Repliscan方法正确鉴定了91%的受试发酵菌,错误鉴定了2%,未能鉴定出7%。在所研究的菌属中,就总体鉴定率而言,肠杆菌属给该系统带来了最大的问题。Repliscan似乎是一种用于鉴定肠杆菌科细菌的高效、经济且有效的实验室工具。