Woolfrey B F, Quall C O, Fox J M
J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Jan;13(1):58-61. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.58-61.1981.
A total of 1,013 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were identified in parallel by the Repliscan (Cathra International, Ontario, Canada) and API 20E (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) systems. There was a 62% agreement at the genus level between the two systems. Of the 38% discrepant results, Repliscan classified 22% as "biochemical pattern not on file," 8% as a multiple-genus group which included the API 20E identification, and 8% as a genus other than that designated by API 20E. Relative to the various genera, Repliscan agreed with API 20E as follows: Escherichia coli, 80%; Klebsiella spp., 76%; Citrobacter spp., 75%; Proteus spp., 69%; Providencia spp., 54%; Serratia spp., 49%; Enterobacter spp., 25%; Shigella spp., 4%; and Salmonella spp., 0%. Repliscan identified 35% of Enterobacter spp. isolates as Citrobacter spp., 91% of Shigella spp. isolates as a multiple-choice-genus group, and 67% of Salmonella spp. isolates as "biochemical pattern not on file." Repliscan agreed with API 20E at the species level as follows: E. coli, 80%; Klebsiella spp., 56%; Citrobacter spp., 66%; Proteus spp., 55%; Providencia spp., 46%; Serratia spp., 39%; Enterobacter spp., 18%; Shigella spp., 4%; and Salmonella spp., 0%. These findings indicate that the Repliscan system in its present stage of development does not reliably identify the Enterobacteriaceae.
通过Repliscan系统(加拿大安大略省的Cathra International公司)和API 20E系统(纽约州普莱恩维尤的Analytab Products公司)对总共1013株肠杆菌科细菌进行了平行鉴定。两个系统在属水平上的一致性为62%。在38%的差异结果中,Repliscan将22%分类为“无存档生化模式”,8%分类为包含API 20E鉴定结果的多属组,8%分类为与API 20E指定属不同的属。相对于各个属,Repliscan与API 20E的一致性如下:大肠杆菌,80%;克雷伯菌属,76%;柠檬酸杆菌属,75%;变形杆菌属,69%;普罗威登斯菌属,54%;沙雷菌属,49%;肠杆菌属,25%;志贺菌属,4%;沙门菌属,0%。Repliscan将35%的肠杆菌属分离株鉴定为柠檬酸杆菌属,将91%的志贺菌属分离株鉴定为多选择属组,将67%的沙门菌属分离株鉴定为“无存档生化模式”。Repliscan与API 20E在种水平上的一致性如下:大肠杆菌,80%;克雷伯菌属,56%;柠檬酸杆菌属,66%;变形杆菌属,55%;普罗威登斯菌属,46%;沙雷菌属,39%;肠杆菌属,18%;志贺菌属,4%;沙门菌属,0%。这些结果表明,处于当前开发阶段的Repliscan系统不能可靠地鉴定肠杆菌科细菌。