Suppr超能文献

评估Vitek GNI+和贝克顿·迪金森微生物系统Crystal E/NF鉴定系统对肠杆菌科成员及其他革兰氏阴性、葡萄糖发酵和非葡萄糖发酵杆菌的鉴定能力。

Evaluation of Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems Crystal E/NF identification systems for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other gram-negative, glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.

作者信息

O'Hara C M, Westbrook G L, Miller J M

机构信息

Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3269-73. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.12.3269-3273.1997.

Abstract

We evaluated the Vitek GNI+ and Becton Dickinson Crystal E/NF identification systems for their ability to accurately identify 619 and 626 strains, respectively, of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other glucose-fermenting and non-glucose-fermenting gram-negative rods. All strains tested were taken from a stock collection and passed three times on 5% sheep blood agar prior to testing. These strains represented a more rigorous challenge to both systems than one resulting from the testing of consecutive clinical isolates. Testing with both systems was done according to the manufacturers' instructions, and tests were repeated in duplicate when errors occurred. Vitek version 5.01 and Crystal version 3.0 softwares were used for identifications. The identification results from each system were compared with identifications previously determined with reference biochemicals. At the completion of the appropriate incubation period, the GNI+ and Crystal systems correctly identified 80.1 and 71.1% of the total isolates, respectively. After additional tests suggested by the software programs were completed, the GNI+ had an accuracy of 87.6% and the Crystal system's accuracy had improved to 87.9%. The error rates for the GNI+ and Crystal systems were 6.5 and 5.3%, respectively. A report of "no identification" was given for 6.0 and 6.9% of the isolates, respectively, and was associated with no particular organism group. One isolate each of Acinetobacter lwoffii and Vibrio alginolyticus would not grow in the Vitek card. The average times to detection for correct enteric identifications in the GNI+ system were 4.1 and 6.8 h for nonenteric identifications, while the Crystal results were routinely read at 18 h. We conclude that there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the results of the GNI+ card and those of the Crystal E/NF system after additional testing was performed with the group of organisms tested, but the overall accuracy for both systems in this study was below 90%.

摘要

我们评估了Vitek GNI+和Becton Dickinson Crystal E/NF鉴定系统分别对619株和626株肠杆菌科成员以及其他葡萄糖发酵和非葡萄糖发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的准确鉴定能力。所有测试菌株均取自菌种保藏库,在测试前于5%绵羊血琼脂上传代三次。与连续临床分离株测试相比,这些菌株对两个系统都构成了更严峻的挑战。按照制造商的说明使用两个系统进行测试,出现错误时重复测试两次。使用Vitek 5.01版和Crystal 3.0版软件进行鉴定。将每个系统的鉴定结果与先前用参考生化方法确定的鉴定结果进行比较。在适当的培养期结束时,GNI+和Crystal系统分别正确鉴定了80.1%和71.1%的总分离株。在完成软件程序建议的额外测试后,GNI+的准确率为87.6%,Crystal系统的准确率提高到了87.9%。GNI+和Crystal系统的错误率分别为6.5%和5.3%。分别有6.0%和6.9%的分离株报告为“无法鉴定”,且与特定的生物体组无关。一株洛菲不动杆菌和一株溶藻弧菌在Vitek卡中均未生长。GNI+系统中正确鉴定肠道菌的平均检测时间为4.1小时,非肠道菌的平均检测时间为6.8小时,而Crystal系统的结果通常在18小时读取。我们得出结论,在用测试的生物体组进行额外测试后,GNI+卡和Crystal E/NF系统的结果之间没有显著差异(P>0.05),但本研究中两个系统的总体准确率均低于90%。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Identification and genomovar assignation of clinical strains of Pseudomonas stutzeri.鉴定和基因组变异群指派临床菌株恶臭假单胞菌。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012 Sep;31(9):2133-9. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1547-4. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
7
The genus Hafnia: from soup to nuts.哈夫尼亚菌属:从始至终
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006 Jan;19(1):12-8. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.12-28.2006.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验