Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Laboratory of Translational Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Digestion. 2023;104(4):249-261. doi: 10.1159/000529622. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has a strong acid suppression effect and potent efficacy in acid-associated diseases, including Helicobacter pylori eradication. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.
We conducted a systematic literature search through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to June 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy and triple therapies for H. pylori eradication. Primary outcomes were cure rates and relative efficacy. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, dropout rate, and subgroup analysis.
Five studies with 1,852 patients were included in the analysis. The cure rates of vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy were 85.6% with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 79.7-91.5% and 88.5% (95% CI: 83.2-93.8%) in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. The efficacy of vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy was not inferior to that of triple therapy with pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.97-1.10) and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98-1.08) in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses; while it was significantly superior to the omeprazole or lansoprazole-based triple therapy (RR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.25, p = 0.001). For clarithromycin-resistant strains, vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy showed superiority to vonoprazan-based triple therapy (86.7% vs. 71.4%, RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.39, p = 0.02); however, vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy was significant inferior to vonoprazan-based triple therapy for clarithromycin-sensitive strains (83.0% vs. 92.8%, RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.95, p = 0.0002). The adverse effects of vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy were lower than those of triple therapy (21.2% vs. 26.5%, RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.73-1.01, p = 0.06), especially the incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.01).
The efficacy of vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy is noninferior to vonoprazan-based triple therapy but superior to the omeprazole or lansoprazole-based triple therapy and has less side effects. Patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains are particularly expected to benefit from vonoprazan/amoxicillin dual therapy.
沃诺拉赞是一种新型钾竞争性酸阻滞剂,具有强大的抑酸作用和治疗酸相关疾病的功效,包括幽门螺杆菌根除。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以调查沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法在幽门螺杆菌根除方面的疗效和安全性。
我们通过 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统的文献检索,截至 2022 年 6 月,以确定比较沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法和三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌根除的随机对照试验和队列研究。主要结局是治愈率和相对疗效。次要结局包括不良事件、退出率和亚组分析。
共有 5 项研究纳入了 1852 名患者进行分析。沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法的治愈率在意向治疗和方案分析中分别为 85.6%(95%可信区间:79.7-91.5%)和 88.5%(95%可信区间:83.2-93.8%)。沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法的疗效不劣于三联疗法,汇总风险比(RR)分别为 1.03(95%可信区间:0.97-1.10)和 1.02(95%可信区间:0.98-1.08);而它明显优于奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑为基础的三联疗法(RR=1.15,95%可信区间:1.05-1.25,p=0.001)。对于克拉霉素耐药菌株,沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法优于沃诺拉赞为基础的三联疗法(86.7% vs. 71.4%,RR=1.20,95%可信区间:1.03-1.39,p=0.02);然而,对于克拉霉素敏感菌株,沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法显著劣于沃诺拉赞为基础的三联疗法(83.0% vs. 92.8%,RR=0.90,95%可信区间:0.85-0.95,p=0.0002)。沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法的不良反应发生率低于三联疗法(21.2% vs. 26.5%,RR=0.86,95%可信区间:0.73-1.01,p=0.06),特别是腹泻的发生率(p=0.01)。
沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法的疗效不劣于沃诺拉赞为基础的三联疗法,但优于奥美拉唑或兰索拉唑为基础的三联疗法,且副作用较少。克拉霉素耐药菌株的患者尤其有望从沃诺拉赞/阿莫西林双联疗法中获益。