Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):470-477. doi: 10.1055/a-2068-6940. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Pseudorandomized testing can be applied to perform rigorous yet practical evaluations of clinical decision support tools. We apply this methodology to an interruptive alert aimed at reducing free-text prescriptions. Using free-text instead of structured computerized provider order entry elements can cause medication errors and inequity in care by bypassing medication-based clinical decision support tools and hindering automated translation of prescription instructions.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an interruptive alert at reducing free-text prescriptions via pseudorandomized testing using native electronic health records (EHR) functionality.
Two versions of an EHR alert triggered when a provider attempted to sign a discharge free-text prescription. The visible version displayed an interruptive alert to the user, and a silent version triggered in the background, serving as a control. Providers were assigned to the visible and silent arms based on even/odd EHR provider IDs. The proportion of encounters with a free-text prescription was calculated across the groups. Alert trigger rates were compared in process control charts. Free-text prescriptions were analyzed to identify prescribing patterns.
Over the 28-week study period, 143 providers triggered 695 alerts (345 visible and 350 silent). The proportions of encounters with free-text prescriptions were 83% (266/320) and 90% (273/303) in the intervention and control groups, respectively ( = 0.01). For the active alert, median time to action was 31 seconds. Alert trigger rates between groups were similar over time. Ibuprofen, oxycodone, steroid tapers, and oncology-related prescriptions accounted for most free-text prescriptions. A majority of these prescriptions originated from user preference lists.
An interruptive alert was associated with a modest reduction in free-text prescriptions. Furthermore, the majority of these prescriptions could have been reproduced using structured order entry fields. Targeting user preference lists shows promise for future intervention.
伪随机测试可用于对临床决策支持工具进行严格而实用的评估。我们将这种方法应用于旨在减少自由文本处方的中断式警报。使用自由文本而不是结构化的计算机化医嘱输入元素可能会导致用药错误和护理不公平,因为它绕过了基于药物的临床决策支持工具,并阻碍了处方说明的自动翻译。
本研究的目的是使用原生电子健康记录 (EHR) 功能通过伪随机测试评估中断式警报减少自由文本处方的有效性。
当提供者试图签署出院自由文本处方时,触发两个版本的 EHR 警报。可见版本向用户显示中断式警报,而静默版本在后台触发,作为对照。根据 EHR 提供者 ID 的奇偶性将提供者分配到可见和静默臂。计算各组中出现自由文本处方的比例。在过程控制图中比较警报触发率。分析自由文本处方以确定处方模式。
在 28 周的研究期间,143 名提供者触发了 695 次警报(345 次可见和 350 次静默)。干预组和对照组中出现自由文本处方的比例分别为 83%(266/320)和 90%(273/303)( = 0.01)。对于活动警报,采取行动的中位数时间为 31 秒。随着时间的推移,两组之间的警报触发率相似。布洛芬、羟考酮、类固醇减量和肿瘤相关处方占大多数自由文本处方。这些处方大多来自用户偏好列表。
中断式警报与自由文本处方的适度减少相关。此外,这些处方中的大多数都可以使用结构化订单输入字段来重现。针对用户偏好列表显示出未来干预的前景。