Suppr超能文献

社交机器人与意向立场。

Social robots and the intentional stance.

作者信息

Veit Walter, Browning Heather

机构信息

School of History and Philosophy of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 5;46:e47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001595.

Abstract

Why is it that people simultaneously treat social robots as mere designed artefacts, yet show willingness to interact with them as if they were real agents? Here, we argue that Dennett's distinction between the intentional stance and the design stance can help us to resolve this puzzle, allowing us to further our understanding of social robots as interactive depictions.

摘要

为什么人们一方面将社交机器人仅仅视为设计出来的人工制品,另一方面却又表现出愿意与它们互动,仿佛它们是真实的智能体呢?在此,我们认为丹尼特对意向立场和设计立场的区分有助于我们解开这个谜题,使我们能够进一步理解社交机器人作为交互式描绘的本质。

相似文献

1
Social robots and the intentional stance.社交机器人与意向立场。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 5;46:e47. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001595.
2
Social robots as depictions of social agents.作为社会主体描绘的社交机器人。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 Mar 28;46:e21. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22000668.
4
People treat social robots as real social agents.
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 5;46:e28. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001534.
5
8
The Classical Stance: Dennett's Criterion in Wallacian quantum mechanics.经典立场:华莱士量子力学中的丹尼特判据。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2024 Oct;107:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验