Bhattarai S, Neopane A K, Shrestha B, Dangol S R, Shrestha S Kd, Dutta A, Adhikari G, Dahal S
Department of Global Health, Global Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, Chakupat, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Department of Medical Operations, COVID-19 Crisis Management Center (CCMC), Chauni, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2022 Apr-Jun;20(78):214-218.
Background The coronavirus pandemic preparedness and response activities began in Nepal after the detection of the first case on 24 January 2020. Highest daily case record in June 2020 was 671, but it reached above 5,000 in October 2020. Objective This study assessed preparedness and response status of government designated COVID-19 clinics and various level hospitals. Method A web-based survey was conducted among government designated COVID-19 clinics and Level hospitals in June 2020. The Medical Operations Division of the COVID-19 Crisis Management Center (CCMC) retained contact list of focal person in each facility for regular updates. Forty-nine out of 125 clinics and all level hospitals (five Level-1, 12 Level-2, three Level-3) provided responses. Result There were 25 or less isolation beds in the majority of COVID-19 clinics (83.7%) and Level-1 hospitals (60%), whereas the majority of Level-2 (92%) and Level-3 hospitals (67%) had arranged >25 beds. Only five clinics, one Level-1 hospital, six Level-2 and two Level-3 hospitals had a surge capacity of additional 20 or more isolation beds. Only one-fourth of the designated health facilities had arranged separate isolation facility for vulnerable population. Majority of the designated clinics and Level-1 hospitals had five or less functional ICU beds and functional ventilators. Very few Level-2 hospitals had > 10 ICU beds and > 10 ventilators. Healthcare workers in the majority of facilities were trained on donning/doffing, hand washing, swab collection, and healthcare waste management, but, a very few received formal training on patient transport, dead body management, epidemic drill, and critical care. Conclusion This study revealed insufficient preparation in COVID-19 facilities during the initial phase of pandemic. The findings were utilized by the government stakeholders at central, provincial and local levels for scaling up surge capacity and improving health services at the time of case surge. As the pandemic itself is a dynamic process, periodic assessments are needed to gauze preparedness and response during different phases of disease outbreak.
2020年1月24日尼泊尔发现首例新型冠状病毒病例后,该国便开始了新冠疫情防范与应对活动。2020年6月每日新增病例最高纪录为671例,但在2020年10月这一数字超过了5000例。
本研究评估了政府指定的新冠病毒诊所及各级医院的防范与应对状况。
2020年6月,对政府指定的新冠病毒诊所及各级医院开展了一项基于网络的调查。新冠病毒危机管理中心(CCMC)的医疗运营部门保留了每个机构联系人的名单,以便定期更新。125家诊所中的49家以及所有各级医院(5家一级医院、12家二级医院、3家三级医院)提供了回复。
大多数新冠病毒诊所(83.7%)和一级医院(60%)的隔离床位为25张或更少,而大多数二级医院(92%)和三级医院(67%)安排了超过25张床位。只有5家诊所、1家一级医院、6家二级医院和2家三级医院具备额外增加20张或更多隔离床位的应急能力。只有四分之一的指定医疗机构为弱势群体安排了单独的隔离设施。大多数指定诊所和一级医院的功能性重症监护床位和功能性呼吸机为5台或更少。很少有二级医院的重症监护床位超过10张且呼吸机超过10台。大多数机构的医护人员接受了穿脱防护服、洗手、咽拭子采集和医疗废物管理方面的培训,但只有极少数人接受了患者转运、尸体管理、疫情演练和重症护理方面的正规培训。
本研究显示,在疫情初期,新冠病毒设施的准备工作不足。中央、省和地方各级政府利益相关者利用这些研究结果,在病例激增时扩大应急能力并改善医疗服务。由于疫情本身是一个动态过程,需要定期进行评估,以衡量疾病爆发不同阶段的防范与应对情况。