Suppr超能文献

利用特定频率的合成语音刺激的辅助性皮质听觉诱发电位检测婴儿:敏感性、可重复性和可行性。

Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Infants With Frequency-Specific Synthetic Speech Stimuli: Sensitivity, Repeatability, and Feasibility.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.

Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1157-1172. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001352. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) test is a candidate for supplementing clinical practice for infant hearing aid users and others who are not developmentally ready for behavioral testing. Sensitivity of the test for given sensation levels (SLs) has been reported to some degree, but further data are needed from large numbers of infants within the target age range, including repeat data where CAEPs were not detected initially. This study aims to assess sensitivity, repeatability, acceptability, and feasibility of CAEPs as a clinical measure of aided audibility in infants.

DESIGN

One hundred and three infant hearing aid users were recruited from 53 pediatric audiology centers across the UK. Infants underwent aided CAEP testing at age 3 to 7 months to a mid-frequency (MF) and (mid-)high-frequency (HF) synthetic speech stimulus. CAEP testing was repeated within 7 days. When developmentally ready (aged 7-21 months), the infants underwent aided behavioral hearing testing using the same stimuli, to estimate the decibel (dB) SL (i.e., level above threshold) of those stimuli when presented at the CAEP test sessions. Percentage of CAEP detections for different dB SLs are reported using an objective detection method (Hotellings T 2 ). Acceptability was assessed using caregiver interviews and a questionnaire, and feasibility by recording test duration and completion rate.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity for a single CAEP test when the stimuli were ≥0 dB SL (i.e., audible) was 70% for the MF stimulus and 54% for the HF stimulus. After repeat testing, this increased to 84% and 72%, respectively. For SL >10 dB, the respective MF and HF test sensitivities were 80% and 60% for a single test, increasing to 94% and 79% for the two tests combined. Clinical feasibility was demonstrated by an excellent >99% completion rate, and acceptable median test duration of 24 minutes, including preparation time. Caregivers reported overall positive experiences of the test.

CONCLUSIONS

By addressing the clinical need to provide data in the target age group at different SLs, we have demonstrated that aided CAEP testing can supplement existing clinical practice when infants with hearing loss are not developmentally ready for traditional behavioral assessment. Repeat testing is valuable to increase test sensitivity. For clinical application, it is important to be aware of CAEP response variability in this age group.

摘要

目的

皮质听觉诱发电位(CAEP)测试是一种补充临床实践的方法,适用于婴儿助听器使用者和其他未准备好进行行为测试的人群。该测试在特定感觉水平(SL)下的敏感性已在一定程度上得到了报道,但仍需要在目标年龄范围内的大量婴儿中进一步收集数据,包括最初未检测到 CAEP 的重复数据。本研究旨在评估 CAEP 作为婴儿助听可听度的临床测量手段的敏感性、可重复性、可接受性和可行性。

设计

本研究从英国 53 家儿科听力中心招募了 103 名婴儿助听器使用者。婴儿在 3 至 7 个月大时接受中频率(MF)和(中-高)高频(HF)合成语音刺激的有辅助 CAEP 测试。在 7 天内重复进行 CAEP 测试。当婴儿发育到 7-21 个月大时,他们接受相同刺激的有辅助行为听力测试,以估计在 CAEP 测试期间呈现这些刺激时的分贝(dB)SL(即,阈值以上的水平)。使用客观检测方法(Hotellings T 2 )报告不同 dB SL 下 CAEP 检测的百分比。通过 caregiver访谈和问卷评估可接受性,并通过记录测试持续时间和完成率评估可行性。

结果

当刺激的 SL 为≥0 dB(即可听)时,单次 CAEP 测试的总体敏感性为 MF 刺激的 70%,HF 刺激的 54%。重复测试后,这一比例分别增加到 84%和 72%。对于 SL >10 dB,MF 和 HF 测试的各自测试敏感性分别为 80%和 60%,两个测试结合后的敏感性分别增加到 94%和 79%。通过极高的>99%完成率和可接受的 24 分钟中位数测试持续时间(包括准备时间),证明了临床可行性。照顾者报告了对测试的整体积极体验。

结论

通过满足在不同 SL 下为目标年龄组提供数据的临床需求,我们证明了当有听力损失的婴儿未准备好进行传统行为评估时,有辅助 CAEP 测试可以补充现有的临床实践。重复测试对于提高测试敏感性很有价值。在临床应用中,了解该年龄组中 CAEP 反应的可变性非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b72/10426785/84d7bda6f819/aud-44-1157-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验