• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测一年以上的幸福感使用社会人口因素、个性、健康行为、认知和生活事件。

Predicting wellbeing over one year using sociodemographic factors, personality, health behaviours, cognition, and life events.

机构信息

Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia.

School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 5;13(1):5565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32588-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-32588-3
PMID:37019908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10076502/
Abstract

Various sociodemographic, psychosocial, cognitive, and life event factors are associated with mental wellbeing; however, it remains unclear which measures best explain variance in wellbeing in the context of related variables. This study uses data from 1017 healthy adults from the TWIN-E study of wellbeing to evaluate the sociodemographic, psychosocial, cognitive, and life event predictors of wellbeing using cross-sectional and repeated measures multiple regression models over one year. Sociodemographic (age, sex, education), psychosocial (personality, health behaviours, and lifestyle), emotion and cognitive processing, and life event (recent positive and negative life events) variables were considered. The results showed that while neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, and cognitive reappraisal were the strongest predictors of wellbeing in the cross-sectional model, while extraversion, conscientiousness, exercise, and specific life events (work related and traumatic life events) were the strongest predictors of wellbeing in the repeated measures model. These results were confirmed using tenfold cross-validation procedures. Together, the results indicate that the variables that best explain differences in wellbeing between individuals at baseline can vary from the variables that predict change in wellbeing over time. This suggests that different variables may need to be targeted to improve population-level compared to individual-level wellbeing.

摘要

各种社会人口统计学、心理社会、认知和生活事件因素与心理健康有关;然而,在相关变量的背景下,哪些措施最能解释幸福感的差异仍不清楚。本研究使用来自 TWIN-E 幸福感研究的 1017 名健康成年人的数据,使用横断面和重复测量多元回归模型,在一年的时间内评估幸福感的社会人口统计学、心理社会、认知和生活事件预测因素。考虑了社会人口统计学(年龄、性别、教育)、心理社会(人格、健康行为和生活方式)、情绪和认知处理以及生活事件(近期积极和消极生活事件)变量。结果表明,神经质、外向性、尽责性和认知重评在横断面模型中是幸福感的最强预测因素,而外向性、尽责性、锻炼和特定生活事件(与工作相关和创伤性生活事件)是重复测量模型中幸福感的最强预测因素。使用十重交叉验证程序验证了这些结果。总之,这些结果表明,在基线时个体之间幸福感差异的最佳解释变量可能与随时间变化预测幸福感的变量不同。这表明,与个体层面相比,改善人群层面的幸福感可能需要针对不同的变量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/e6ec16017419/41598_2023_32588_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/436f0534bbc9/41598_2023_32588_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/361531d8ee92/41598_2023_32588_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/4de58d5d4f94/41598_2023_32588_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/e6ec16017419/41598_2023_32588_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/436f0534bbc9/41598_2023_32588_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/361531d8ee92/41598_2023_32588_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/4de58d5d4f94/41598_2023_32588_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/831a/10076502/e6ec16017419/41598_2023_32588_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting wellbeing over one year using sociodemographic factors, personality, health behaviours, cognition, and life events.预测一年以上的幸福感使用社会人口因素、个性、健康行为、认知和生活事件。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 5;13(1):5565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32588-3.
2
Interaction of personality traits with social deprivation in determining mental wellbeing and health behaviours.人格特质与社会剥夺相互作用对心理健康和健康行为的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Dec;34(4):615-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds030. Epub 2012 May 2.
3
Personality Polygenes, Positive Affect, and Life Satisfaction.人格多基因、积极情绪与生活满意度。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Oct;19(5):407-17. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.65. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
The role of personality traits and leisure activities in predicting wellbeing in young people.人格特质和休闲活动在预测年轻人幸福感中的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Nov 4;10(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00954-x.
5
Association of big-5 personality traits with cognitive impairment and dementia: a longitudinal study.大五人格特质与认知障碍和痴呆的关系:一项纵向研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Oct;74(10):799-805. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213014. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
6
Mobility and cognition are associated with wellbeing and health related quality of life among older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort.在老年人中,身体活动能力和认知能力与幸福感及健康相关生活质量相关:对温哥华跌倒预防队列的横断面分析
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Jul 5;15:75. doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0076-2.
7
Big Five personality traits: are they really important for the subjective well-being of Indians?大五人格特质:它们对印度人的主观幸福感真的重要吗?
Int J Psychol. 2015 Feb;50(1):64-9. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12060. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
8
Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?丰富化对成人认知发展的影响:老年人的功能能力能否得到保持和增强?
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2008 Oct;9(1):1-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
Patterns and associates of cognitive function, psychosocial wellbeing and health in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.1936年洛锡安出生队列中认知功能、心理社会幸福感与健康的模式及关联因素
BMC Geriatr. 2014 Apr 23;14:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-53.
10
Neuroticism and Extraversion in Youth Predict Mental Wellbeing and Life Satisfaction 40 Years Later.青少年时期的神经质和外向性可预测40年后的心理健康和生活满意度。
J Res Pers. 2013 Dec 1;47(6):687-697. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality predicts internalizing symptoms and quality of life in police cadets: a comparison of artificial intelligence and parametric approaches.人格可预测警校学员的内化症状和生活质量:人工智能与参数方法的比较
Health Justice. 2025 Jul 4;13(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00351-7.
2
Sources of stress in online learning scale: development and validation of an instrument to evaluate students' stressors associated with the online learning.在线学习压力源量表:一种评估学生与在线学习相关压力源的工具的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2025 May 15;16:1556824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1556824. eCollection 2025.
3
Internal and external factors influencing Gen Z wellbeing.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations between mental wellbeing and fMRI neural bases underlying responses to positive emotion in a twin sample.在双胞胎样本中,心理健康与对积极情绪反应的 fMRI 神经基础之间的关联。
Psychol Med. 2023 Mar;53(4):1215-1223. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002695. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
Who benefits from which activity? On the relations between personality traits, leisure activities, and well-being.谁从哪种活动中受益?人格特质、休闲活动与幸福感的关系。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;125(1):141-172. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000438. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
3
Changes in Physical Activity Are Associated with Corresponding Changes in Psychological Well-Being: A Pandemic Case Study.
影响Z世代幸福感的内部和外部因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):1584. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22124-5.
4
Predicting Weight Control Intentions: An Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior.预测体重控制意图:目标导向行为的扩展模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;22(4):600. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040600.
5
Beyond the pandemic: physical activity and health behaviors as predictors of well-being among Filipino tertiary students.疫情之后:体育活动与健康行为对菲律宾大学生幸福感的预测作用
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 21;16:1490437. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1490437. eCollection 2025.
6
Building machine learning prediction models for well-being using predictors from the exposome and genome in a population cohort.在人群队列中,利用来自暴露组和基因组的预测因子构建用于健康状况的机器学习预测模型。
Nat Ment Health. 2024;2(10):1217-1230. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00294-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
7
Health enhancing behaviors in early adolescence: an investigation of nutrition, sleep, physical activity, mindfulness and social connectedness and their association with psychological distress and wellbeing.青少年早期的健康促进行为:营养、睡眠、身体活动、正念和社会联系及其与心理困扰和幸福感的关联调查
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 25;15:1413268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1413268. eCollection 2024.
8
Structural equation modeling to estimate treatment adherence based on the light triad of personality and sense of coherence in patients with type-2 diabetes: examining the mediating role of psychological well-being.基于2型糖尿病患者人格的轻三联征和连贯感进行结构方程建模以估计治疗依从性:检验心理健康的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1285808. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285808. eCollection 2023.
身体活动的变化与心理幸福感的相应变化有关:疫情案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 12;18(20):10680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010680.
4
Sociodemographic, health-related, and social predictors of subjective well-being among Chinese oldest-old: a national community-based cohort study.中国高龄老人主观幸福感的社会人口学、健康相关和社会预测因素:一项全国性社区为基础的队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 16;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02071-7.
5
A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being.体力活动与生活质量和幸福感的系统评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 12;10(5):1098-1109. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz198.
6
Depression, Anxiety and Stress during COVID-19: Associations with Changes in Physical Activity, Sleep, Tobacco and Alcohol Use in Australian Adults.新冠疫情期间的抑郁、焦虑和压力:与澳大利亚成年人身体活动、睡眠、烟草和酒精使用变化的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 7;17(11):4065. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114065.
7
Physical activity and subjective well-being in healthy individuals: a meta-analytic review.健康个体的身体活动与主观幸福感:元分析综述。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Dec;15(4):574-592. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1760728. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
An outcome-wide analysis of bidirectional associations between changes in meaningfulness of life and health, emotional, behavioural, and social factors.对生活意义的变化与健康、情绪、行为和社会因素之间双向关联的全面分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 15;10(1):6463. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63600-9.
9
Trauma, Resilience, and Mental Health in Migrant and Non-Migrant Youth: An International Cross-Sectional Study Across Six Countries.移民与非移民青少年的创伤、复原力和心理健康:一项横跨六个国家的国际横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 9;10:997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00997. eCollection 2019.
10
Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis.人格对心理和主观幸福感的预测:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):279-323. doi: 10.1037/bul0000226. Epub 2020 Jan 16.