• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种玉米基因型对低温耐受性的比较蛋白质分析。

Comparative protein analysis of two maize genotypes with contrasting tolerance to low temperature.

机构信息

Plant Molecular Biology Lab, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Kashmir, 190 006, India.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04198-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-023-04198-8
PMID:37020183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10074880/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low temperature (LT) stress is one of the major environmental stress factors affecting the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Hence, it is important to unravel the molecular mechanisms behind LT stress tolerance to improve molecular breeding in LT tolerant genotypes. In the present study, two maize genotypes viz. Gurez local from Kashmir Himalaya and tropical grown GM6, were dissected for their LT stress response in terms of accumulation of differentially regulated proteins (DRPs). Leaf proteome analysis at three-leaf stage of maize seedlings subjected to LT stress of 6 °C for a total of 12 h duration was performed using two dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) followed by subsequent identification of the proteins involved.

RESULTS

After MALDI-TOF (Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight) and bioinformatics analysis, 19 proteins were successfully identified in Gurez local, while as 10 proteins were found to get successful identification in GM6. The interesting observations from the present investigation is the identification of three novel proteins viz. threonine dehydratase biosynthetic chloroplastic, thylakoidal processing peptidase 1 chloroplastic, and nodulin-like protein, whose role in abiotic stress tolerance, in general, and LT stress, in particular, has not been reported so far. It is important to highlight here that most of LT responsive proteins including the three novel proteins were identified from Gurez local only, owing to its exceptional LT tolerance. From the protein profiles, obtained in both genotypes immediately after LT stress perception, it was inferred that stress responsive protein accumulation and their expression fashion help the Gurez local in seedling establishment and withstand unfavorable conditions as compared to GM6. This was inferred from the findings of pathway enrichment analysis like regulation of seed growth, timing of floral transition, lipid glycosylation, and aspartate family amino acid catabolic processes, besides other key stress defense mechanisms. However, in GM6, metabolic pathways enriched were found to be involved in more general processes including cell cycle DNA replication and regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Furthermore, majority of the qRT-PCR results of the selected proteins demonstrated positive correlation between protein levels and transcript abundance, thereby strengthening our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our findings reported majority of the identified proteins in Gurez local exhibiting up-regulated pattern under LT stress as compared to GM6. Furthermore, three novel proteins induced by LT stress were found in Gurez local, requiring further functional validation. Therefore, our results offer more insights for elucidating the molecular networks mediating LT stress tolerance in maize.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/62ea15d9b014/12870_2023_4198_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/360d00c886c6/12870_2023_4198_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9373f93e5978/12870_2023_4198_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/52391056295e/12870_2023_4198_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/07d4f0394c33/12870_2023_4198_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/79f8e3a525f4/12870_2023_4198_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/2be7ea351d6b/12870_2023_4198_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9921d3ed6a4d/12870_2023_4198_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/533014754098/12870_2023_4198_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9b9f3fa02e4b/12870_2023_4198_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/f5fb07c56a48/12870_2023_4198_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/eab56eb9a2ef/12870_2023_4198_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/62ea15d9b014/12870_2023_4198_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/360d00c886c6/12870_2023_4198_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9373f93e5978/12870_2023_4198_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/52391056295e/12870_2023_4198_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/07d4f0394c33/12870_2023_4198_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/79f8e3a525f4/12870_2023_4198_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/2be7ea351d6b/12870_2023_4198_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9921d3ed6a4d/12870_2023_4198_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/533014754098/12870_2023_4198_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/9b9f3fa02e4b/12870_2023_4198_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/f5fb07c56a48/12870_2023_4198_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/eab56eb9a2ef/12870_2023_4198_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e844/10074880/62ea15d9b014/12870_2023_4198_Fig12_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

低温(LT)胁迫是影响玉米(Zea mays L.)生长和产量的主要环境胁迫因素之一。因此,揭示 LT 胁迫耐受的分子机制对于提高 LT 耐受基因型的分子育种至关重要。本研究以克什米尔喜马拉雅山的古雷兹地方品种和热带生长的 GM6 两个玉米基因型为材料,研究其在 LT 胁迫下的差异表达蛋白(DRPs)积累情况,以探讨其 LT 胁迫响应。采用二维凝胶电泳(2D-PAGE)分析玉米幼苗三叶期叶片蛋白质组,在 6°C 下共处理 12 小时,随后对参与的蛋白质进行鉴定。

结果

经 MALDI-TOF(基质辅助激光解吸/电离时间飞行)和生物信息学分析,在古雷兹地方品种中成功鉴定出 19 种蛋白,而在 GM6 中成功鉴定出 10 种蛋白。本研究的有趣发现是鉴定出三种新蛋白,即苏氨酸脱水酶生物合成质体、类囊体加工肽酶 1 质体和类豆球蛋白,它们在非生物胁迫耐受中的作用,特别是在 LT 胁迫中的作用,迄今为止尚未报道。重要的是要在这里强调,包括三种新蛋白在内的大多数 LT 反应蛋白仅在古雷兹地方品种中被鉴定出来,这归因于其异常的 LT 耐受性。从两种基因型在 LT 胁迫感知后立即获得的蛋白质图谱推断,胁迫反应蛋白的积累及其表达方式有助于古雷兹地方品种幼苗的建立,并使其能够抵御不利条件,而 GM6 则不能。这是从途径富集分析中推断出来的,如种子生长的调控、花转变的时间、脂质糖基化和天冬氨酸家族氨基酸的分解代谢过程,以及其他关键的应激防御机制。然而,在 GM6 中,发现富集的代谢途径涉及更一般的过程,包括细胞周期 DNA 复制和苯丙烷代谢的调控。此外,选择蛋白的 qRT-PCR 结果多数显示蛋白质水平和转录丰度之间存在正相关,从而加强了我们的发现。

结论

总之,我们的研究结果报告了大多数在 LT 胁迫下古雷兹地方品种中表达上调的鉴定蛋白,而 GM6 则表达下调。此外,在古雷兹地方品种中发现了三种由 LT 胁迫诱导的新蛋白,需要进一步的功能验证。因此,我们的研究结果为阐明玉米 LT 胁迫耐受的分子网络提供了更多的见解。

相似文献

1
Comparative protein analysis of two maize genotypes with contrasting tolerance to low temperature.两种玉米基因型对低温耐受性的比较蛋白质分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Apr 5;23(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04198-8.
2
Combined gas exchange characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and response curves as selection traits for temperature tolerance in maize genotypes.综合气体交换特性、叶绿素荧光和响应曲线作为玉米基因型耐温性的选择性状。
Photosynth Res. 2021 Dec;150(1-3):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00829-z. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Low temperature elicits differential biochemical and antioxidant responses in maize () genotypes with different susceptibility to low temperature stress.低温在对低温胁迫具有不同敏感性的玉米基因型中引发不同的生化和抗氧化反应。
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2021 Jun;27(6):1395-1412. doi: 10.1007/s12298-021-01020-3. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of contrasting hybrid cultivars reveal key drought-responsive genes and metabolic pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize at various stages.对比分析不同杂交品种的转录组学研究揭示了调控玉米在不同阶段对干旱胁迫耐受性的关键抗旱响应基因和代谢途径。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240468. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparative Proteomic and Physiological Analyses of Two Divergent Maize Inbred Lines Provide More Insights into Drought-Stress Tolerance Mechanisms.两种不同玉米自交系的比较蛋白质组学和生理分析为耐旱性机制提供了更多的见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 18;19(10):3225. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103225.
6
Comparative Proteomics and Physiological Analyses Reveal Important Maize Filling-Kernel Drought-Responsive Genes and Metabolic Pathways.比较蛋白质组学和生理分析揭示了重要的玉米灌浆期抗旱响应基因和代谢途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jul 31;20(15):3743. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153743.
7
Transcriptomic and Physiological Studies Unveil that Brassinolide Maintains the Balance of Maize's Multiple Metabolisms under Low-Temperature Stress.转录组学和生理学研究表明,油菜素内酯在低温胁迫下维持玉米多种代谢物的平衡。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 29;25(17):9396. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179396.
8
Comparative Proteomics of Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Sensitive Maize Inbred Lines to Reveal the Molecular Mechanism of Salt Tolerance.耐盐和盐敏感玉米自交系的比较蛋白质组学研究揭示了耐盐的分子机制。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Sep 24;20(19):4725. doi: 10.3390/ijms20194725.
9
Key Maize Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Inbred Lines.关键玉米抗旱响应基因和途径通过对比自交系的比较转录组和生理分析揭示。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;20(6):1268. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061268.
10
Comparative Proteomics of Contrasting Maize Genotypes Provides Insights into Salt-Stress Tolerance Mechanisms.对比不同玉米基因型的比较蛋白质组学为盐胁迫耐受机制提供了新见解。
J Proteome Res. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):141-153. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00455. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Functional Genomics for Exploring Abiotic Stress Tolerance Mechanisms in Cereals.探索谷物非生物胁迫耐受机制的功能基因组学进展
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;14(16):2459. doi: 10.3390/plants14162459.
2
Transcriptomic and Physiological Studies Unveil that Brassinolide Maintains the Balance of Maize's Multiple Metabolisms under Low-Temperature Stress.转录组学和生理学研究表明,油菜素内酯在低温胁迫下维持玉米多种代谢物的平衡。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 29;25(17):9396. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179396.
3
Genome-wide identification of RNA recognition motif (RRM1) in Brassica rapa and functional analysis of RNA-binding protein (BrRBP) under low-temperature stress.

本文引用的文献

1
Physiological and proteomic analyses revealed the response mechanisms of two different drought-resistant maize varieties.生理和蛋白质组学分析揭示了两种不同抗旱玉米品种的响应机制。
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Nov 4;21(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03295-w.
2
Editorial: Amino Acids in Plants: Regulation and Functions in Development and Stress Defense.社论:植物中的氨基酸:发育与胁迫防御中的调控及功能
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Oct 18;12:772810. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.772810. eCollection 2021.
3
Abiotic stress responses in plants.植物中的非生物胁迫响应
甘蓝型油菜 RNA 识别基序(RRM1)的全基因组鉴定及其在低温胁迫下与 RNA 结合蛋白(BrRBP)的功能分析。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Dec 7;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04639-4.
Nat Rev Genet. 2022 Feb;23(2):104-119. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Natural variation in a type-A response regulator confers maize chilling tolerance.一种 A 型响应调节因子的自然变异赋予玉米耐冷性。
Nat Commun. 2021 Aug 5;12(1):4713. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25001-y.
5
l-Aspartate: An Essential Metabolite for Plant Growth and Stress Acclimation.L-天冬氨酸:植物生长和胁迫适应的必需代谢物。
Molecules. 2021 Mar 26;26(7):1887. doi: 10.3390/molecules26071887.
6
Combined gas exchange characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and response curves as selection traits for temperature tolerance in maize genotypes.综合气体交换特性、叶绿素荧光和响应曲线作为玉米基因型耐温性的选择性状。
Photosynth Res. 2021 Dec;150(1-3):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00829-z. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Cracking the "Sugar Code": A Snapshot of - and -Glycosylation Pathways and Functions in Plants Cells.破解“糖密码”:植物细胞中O-连接和N-连接糖基化途径及功能概述
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 19;12:640919. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.640919. eCollection 2021.
8
Thermal Stresses in Maize: Effects and Management Strategies.玉米中的热应激:影响与管理策略
Plants (Basel). 2021 Feb 4;10(2):293. doi: 10.3390/plants10020293.
9
Leaf transcriptomic response mediated by cold stress in two maize inbred lines with contrasting tolerance levels.叶片转录组对两种玉米自交系冷胁迫的响应及其耐冷性差异的关系。
Genomics. 2021 Mar;113(2):782-794. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
Integrated physiological and chloroplast proteome analysis of wheat seedling leaves under salt and osmotic stresses.盐胁迫和渗透胁迫下小麦幼苗叶片的生理与叶绿体蛋白质组整合分析。
J Proteomics. 2021 Mar 15;234:104097. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104097. Epub 2021 Jan 2.