Suppr超能文献

在气管插管时,与依托咪酯相比,瑞米唑仑联合芬太尼诱导的平均动脉压差异:一项随机对照试验。

The difference in mean arterial pressure induced by remimazolam compared to etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Huang Xiaofang, Cao Huiyu, Zhang Cuiwen, Lan Hongmeng, Gong Xiaofang, Li Ruijie, Lin Yan, Xu Bing, Chen Huihe, Guan Xuehai

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Department of Rehabilitation, the People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 20;14:1143784. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1143784. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Combined use of hypnotic and opioids during anesthesia inductions decreases blood pressure. Post-induction hypotension (PIHO) is the most common side effect of anesthesia induction. We aimed to compare the difference in mean arterial pressure (MAP) induced by remimazolam with that induced by etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation. We assessed 138 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II who underwent elective urological surgery. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either remimazolam or etomidate as alterative hypnotic in the presence of fentanyl during anesthesia induction. Comparable BIS values were achieved in both groups. The primary outcome was the difference in the MAP at tracheal intubation. The secondary outcomes included the characteristics of anesthesia, surgery, and adverse effects. The MAP was higher in the etomidate group than in the remimazolam group at tracheal intubation (108 [22] mmHg vs. 83 [16] mmHg; mean difference, -26; 95% confidence interval [CI], -33 to -19; < 0.0001). Heart rate was significantly higher in the etomidate group than in the remimazolam group at tracheal intubation. The patients' condition warranted the administration of ephedrine more frequently in the remimazolam group (22%) than in the etomidate group (5%) ( = 0.0042) during anesthesia induction. The remimazolam group had a lower incidence of hypertension (0% vs. 9%, = 0.0133), myoclonus (0% vs. 47%, < 0.001), and tachycardia (16% vs. 35%, = 0.0148), and a higher incidence of PIHO (42% vs. 5%, = 0.001) than the etomidate group during anesthesia induction. Remimazolam was associated with lower MAP and lower heart rate compared to etomidate in the presence of fentanyl at tracheal intubation. Patients in the remimazolam group had a higher incidence of PIHO, and their condition warranted the administration of ephedrine more frequently than in the etomidate group during anesthesia induction.

摘要

麻醉诱导期间联合使用催眠药和阿片类药物会降低血压。诱导后低血压(PIHO)是麻醉诱导最常见的副作用。我们旨在比较在气管插管时,瑞米唑仑与依托咪酯在芬太尼存在的情况下所诱导的平均动脉压(MAP)的差异。我们评估了138例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况为I-II级的成年择期泌尿外科手术患者。患者在麻醉诱导期间被随机分配接受瑞米唑仑或依托咪酯作为替代催眠药,并同时使用芬太尼。两组均达到了可比的脑电双频指数(BIS)值。主要结局是气管插管时MAP的差异。次要结局包括麻醉、手术和不良反应的特征。气管插管时,依托咪酯组的MAP高于瑞米唑仑组(108 [22] mmHg对83 [16] mmHg;平均差值,-26;95%置信区间[CI],-33至-19;<0.0001)。气管插管时,依托咪酯组的心率显著高于瑞米唑仑组。在麻醉诱导期间,瑞米唑仑组(22%)比依托咪酯组(5%)更频繁地需要使用麻黄碱来维持患者状态(P = 0.0042)。与依托咪酯组相比,瑞米唑仑组在麻醉诱导期间高血压(0%对9%,P = 0.0133)、肌阵挛(0%对47%,P < 0.001)和心动过速(16%对35%,P = 0.0148)的发生率较低,而PIHO的发生率较高(42%对5%,P = 0.001)。在气管插管时,与依托咪酯相比,瑞米唑仑在芬太尼存在的情况下与更低的MAP和心率相关。瑞米唑仑组PIHO的发生率更高,且在麻醉诱导期间其患者状态比依托咪酯组更频繁地需要使用麻黄碱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca5/10067562/96d87ce65adc/fphar-14-1143784-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验