Liu Yafei, Wan Zhanou, Liao Dalin
Department of Emergency, The 900th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force, PLA, Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, P.R. China.
Department of Emergency, Dongfang Hospital, Xiamen University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350025, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2023 Mar 13;25(4):184. doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11883. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Nutrition support is a key method to treat acute pancreatitis (AP). Enteral nutrition (EN) has a role in treating AP, but the time point for EN initiation remains unclear. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of early EN (EEN) and delayed EN (DEN) based on different time points (24, 48 and 72 h). The relevant databases including Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library were searched until Dec 1, 2022. Studies comparing EEN and DEN in AP were included. The relative risk (RR) was used for comparing categorical variables, while standard mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables, both reported with 95% CI. A total of 17 studies with 1,637 patients with AP was included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. The patients in the DEN group showed a significantly higher risk of mortality compared with the EEN group (RR=1.95; 95% CI, 1.21-3.14; P=0.006). In subgroup analysis, when using 48 h as the cut-off time to distinguish EEN and DEN, the risk of mortality was 3.89-fold higher in the DEN group compared with that in the EN group (95% CI, 1.25-12.17; P=0.019). DEN also increased the occurrence of sepsis in patients with AP (RR=2.82; 95% CI, 1.10-7.18; P=0.03) and duration of hospital stay (P<0.001). The present systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that EEN decreased associated complications, length of hospitalization and mortality in patients with AP and therefore provided a safe approach to improve recovery but there is still controversy around the time point for EEN.
营养支持是治疗急性胰腺炎(AP)的关键方法。肠内营养(EN)在AP治疗中发挥作用,但EN开始的时间点仍不明确。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估基于不同时间点(24、48和72小时)的早期肠内营养(EEN)和延迟肠内营养(DEN)的疗效。检索了包括Pubmed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆在内的相关数据库,直至2022年12月1日。纳入了比较AP中EEN和DEN的研究。分类变量比较采用相对危险度(RR),连续变量采用标准化均数差(SMD),均报告95%置信区间(CI)。本系统评价和荟萃分析共纳入17项研究,涉及1637例AP患者。与EEN组相比,DEN组患者的死亡风险显著更高(RR = 1.95;95% CI,1.21 - 3.14;P = 0.006)。亚组分析中,以48小时作为区分EEN和DEN的截断时间时,DEN组的死亡风险是EEN组的3.89倍(95% CI,1.25 - 12.17;P = 0.019)。DEN还增加了AP患者败血症的发生率(RR = 2.82;95% CI,1.10 - 7.18;P = 0.03)以及住院时间(P < 0.001)。本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,EEN可降低AP患者的相关并发症、住院时间和死亡率,因此提供了一种安全的促进康复的方法,但EEN的时间点仍存在争议。