Neurology and Stroke Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Neuromotorie (DIBINEM), Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):117-124. doi: 10.1177/23969873221131635. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
Recent anticoagulant intake represents a contraindication for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, potentially allowing for thrombolysis. This nation-wide observational cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis preceded by dabigatran-reversal in people with acute ischemic stroke.
We recruited people undergoing thrombolysis following dabigatran-reversal at 17 stroke centers in Italy (reversal-group), people on dabigatran treated with thrombolysis without reversal (no-reversal group), and age, sex, hypertension, stroke severity, and reperfusion treatment-matched controls in 1:7 ratio (control-group). We compared groups for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, main outcome), any brain hemorrhage, good functional outcome (mRS 0-2 at 3 months), and death. The systematic review followed a predefined protocol (CRD42017060274), and odds ratio (OR) meta-analysis was implemented to compare groups.
Thirty-nine patients in dabigatran-reversal group and 300 matched controls were included. Reversal was associated with a non-significant increase in sICH (10.3% vs 6%, aOR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.39-4.52), death (17.9% vs 10%, aOR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.12-4.93) and good functional outcome (64.1% vs 52.8%, aOR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.63-3.19). No hemorrhagic events or deaths were registered in no-reversal group (n = 12). Pooling data from 3 studies after systematic review (n = 1879), reversal carried a non-significant trend for sICH (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.67-3.50), death (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.73-3.24) and good functional outcome (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 0.85-7.16).
People treated with reperfusion strategies after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seem to have a marginal increase in the risk of sICH but comparable functional recovery to matched patients with stroke. Further studies are needed to define treatment cost-effectiveness and potential thresholds in plasma dabigatran concentration for reversal.
近期抗凝药物的摄入是急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓的禁忌证。达比加群的拮抗剂依达鲁单抗可逆转达比加群的抗凝作用,从而可能进行溶栓治疗。这项全国性的观察性队列研究、系统综述和荟萃分析评估了急性缺血性脑卒中患者在接受达比加群逆转治疗后溶栓的疗效和安全性。
我们在意大利的 17 家卒中中心招募了 17 名接受达比加群逆转后溶栓的患者(逆转组)、12 名接受达比加群治疗且未进行逆转溶栓的患者(未逆转组),以及年龄、性别、高血压、卒中严重程度和再灌注治疗相匹配的对照组,比例为 1:7。我们比较了各组症状性颅内出血(sICH,主要结局)、任何脑出血、良好的功能结局(3 个月 mRS 0-2)和死亡情况。系统综述遵循预设方案(CRD42017060274),并实施了比值比(OR)荟萃分析来比较各组。
逆转组纳入了 39 名患者和 300 名匹配的对照组。逆转与 sICH(10.3%比 6%,OR=1.32,95%CI=0.39-4.52)、死亡(17.9%比 10%,OR=0.77,95%CI=0.12-4.93)和良好的功能结局(64.1%比 52.8%,OR=1.41,95%CI=0.63-3.19)的发生率增加无显著相关性。未逆转组(n=12)未发生任何出血事件或死亡。经过系统综述后,3 项研究共纳入 1879 名患者(n=1879),数据汇总显示,逆转与 sICH(OR=1.53,95%CI=0.67-3.50)、死亡(OR=1.53,95%CI=0.73-3.24)和良好的功能结局(OR=2.46,95%CI=0.85-7.16)的发生率增加呈非显著趋势。
接受达比加群逆转后接受再灌注治疗的患者发生 sICH 的风险似乎略有增加,但与卒中匹配患者的功能恢复相当。需要进一步的研究来确定治疗的成本效益和血浆达比加群浓度的潜在逆转阈值。