• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Is the socioeconomic inequality in stroke prognosis changing over time and does quality of care play a role?社会经济不平等状况是否会随时间推移而改变,医疗质量是否发挥作用?
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):351-360. doi: 10.1177/23969873221146591. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
2
Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.髋部骨折患者临床结局的社会经济不平等:一项全国性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1233-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3853-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
3
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.社会经济不平等与急性缺血性脑卒中再灌注治疗。
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2307-2316. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037687. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Outcomes after acute ischemic stroke in the United States: does residential ZIP code matter?美国急性缺血性卒中后的结局:居住邮编有影响吗?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Mar 15;4(3):e001629. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001629.
5
Socioeconomic deprivation and mortality in people after ischemic stroke: The China National Stroke Registry.缺血性卒中患者的社会经济剥夺与死亡率:中国国家卒中登记研究
Int J Stroke. 2016 Jul;11(5):557-64. doi: 10.1177/1747493016641121. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
Socioeconomic differences in quality of care and clinical outcome after stroke: a nationwide population-based study.社会经济差异对卒中后医疗质量和临床结局的影响:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
Stroke. 2011 Oct;42(10):2896-902. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611871. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
7
"Weekend Effect" on 30-Day Readmissions among Stroke Survivors: An Analysis of the National Readmission Database.中风幸存者30天再入院率的“周末效应”:对国家再入院数据库的分析
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2019;9(2):66-71. doi: 10.1159/000500611. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
8
Mediation Analyses of the Mechanisms by Which Socioeconomic Status, Comorbidity, Stroke Severity, and Acute Care Influence Stroke Outcome.社会经济地位、共病、卒中严重程度和急性治疗影响卒中结局的机制的中介分析。
Neurology. 2023 Dec 4;101(23):e2345-e2354. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207939.
9
Socioeconomic Factors and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Heart Failure in a Universal Health Care System.在全民医保体系中,心力衰竭患者的社会经济因素与临床结局。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;7(9):746-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.06.003.
10
Neighborhood income inequality associated with functional independence after ischemic stroke: a cohort study.缺血性中风后邻里收入不平等与功能独立性的关系:一项队列研究。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025 Jan;34(1):108035. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108035. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Multiple Mediators to Mitigate Socioeconomic Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes After Stroke: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.调查多种中介因素以减轻中风后患者报告结局中的社会经济差异:一项基于全国登记处的研究
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e039466. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039466. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
2
Quality of early stroke care and long-term mortality in patients with acute stroke: A nationwide follow-up study.急性脑卒中患者早期卒中护理质量与长期死亡率:一项全国性随访研究。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):1000-1007. doi: 10.1177/23969873241249580. Epub 2024 May 5.
3
Mediation Analyses of the Mechanisms by Which Socioeconomic Status, Comorbidity, Stroke Severity, and Acute Care Influence Stroke Outcome.社会经济地位、共病、卒中严重程度和急性治疗影响卒中结局的机制的中介分析。
Neurology. 2023 Dec 4;101(23):e2345-e2354. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207939.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment Delays and Chance of Reperfusion Therapy in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Danish Nationwide Study.急性脑卒中患者的治疗延迟与再灌注治疗机会:一项丹麦全国性研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023;52(3):275-282. doi: 10.1159/000526733. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.社会经济不平等与急性缺血性脑卒中再灌注治疗。
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2307-2316. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037687. Epub 2022 May 17.
3
A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement.随机试验和观察性研究中介分析报告的指南:AGReMA 声明。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1045-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14075.
4
Index-Based Inequality in Quality of Care: An Empirical Comparison of Apples and Pears.基于指数的医疗质量不平等:苹果与梨的实证比较
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep 3;13:791-800. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S311813. eCollection 2021.
5
Socioeconomic status and survival after stroke - using mediation and sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of stroke severity and unmeasured confounding.社会经济地位与卒中后生存 - 使用中介分析和敏感性分析评估卒中严重程度和未测量混杂因素的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08629-1.
6
Income inequalities in stroke incidence and mortality: Trends in stroke-free and stroke-affected life years based on German health insurance data.收入不平等与卒中发病和死亡:基于德国健康保险数据的无卒中和卒中影响生命年趋势。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0227541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227541. eCollection 2020.
7
Socioeconomic Status And Acute Stroke Care: Has The Inequality Gap Been Closed?社会经济地位与急性中风护理:不平等差距是否已消除?
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 23;11:933-941. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S218322. eCollection 2019.
8
Access to and delivery of acute ischaemic stroke treatments: A survey of national scientific societies and stroke experts in 44 European countries.急性缺血性中风治疗的可及性与提供情况:对44个欧洲国家的国家科学学会和中风专家的一项调查
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):13-28. doi: 10.1177/2396987318786023. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
Social Inequality by Income in Short- and Long-Term Cause-Specific Mortality after Stroke.中风后短期和长期特定病因死亡率方面的收入社会不平等
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jun;28(6):1529-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.013. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
10
Socioeconomic disparities in first stroke incidence, quality of care, and survival: a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 44 million adults in England.社会经济差异对首次脑卒中发病、医疗质量和生存的影响:一项基于全国登记的队列研究,纳入了英格兰 4400 万成年人。
Lancet Public Health. 2018 Apr;3(4):e185-e193. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30030-6. Epub 2018 Mar 15.

社会经济不平等状况是否会随时间推移而改变,医疗质量是否发挥作用?

Is the socioeconomic inequality in stroke prognosis changing over time and does quality of care play a role?

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Stroke J. 2023 Mar;8(1):351-360. doi: 10.1177/23969873221146591. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

DOI:10.1177/23969873221146591
PMID:37021167
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069209/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In a publicly financed healthcare system we aimed to study the development in socioeconomic disparity in ischemic stroke outcomes over time. In addition, we study whether the healthcare system affects these outcomes through the quality of early stroke care when adjustments are made for various patient characteristics incl. comorbidity and stroke severity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using nationwide, detailed individual-level register-data we analysed how income-related and education-related inequality in 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission risk developed between 2003 and 2018. In addition, focusing on income-related inequality, we applied mediation analyses to estimate the mediating role of quality of acute stroke care on 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 97,779 individual ischemic stroke patients were registered in Denmark with a first ever stroke in the study period. Three-point-seven percent died within 30 days of their index-admission and 11.5% were readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The income-related inequality in mortality remained virtually unchanged over time from an RR of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.38; 0.74) in 2003-06 to RR 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53; 0.89)) in 2015-18 when high income was compared to low income (Family income-time interaction: RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.98-1.03)). A similar but less uniform trend was found for the education-related inequality in mortality (Education-time interaction: RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.04)). The income-related disparity in 30-day readmission was smaller than in 30-day mortality and it diminished over time from 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58; 0.83) to 0.97 (95% CI: 0.87; 1.10). The mediation analysis showed no systematic mediating effect of quality of care on neither mortality nor readmission. However, it cannot be ruled out that residual confounding may have washed out some mediating effects.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The socioeconomic inequality in stroke mortality and re-admission risk has yet to be eliminated. Additional studies from different settings are warranted in order to clarify the impact of socioeconomic inequality of quality of acute stroke care.

摘要

介绍

在公共资助的医疗体系中,我们旨在研究随着时间的推移,缺血性脑卒中结局的社会经济差异的发展。此外,我们研究了在调整各种患者特征(包括合并症和卒中严重程度)后,医疗保健系统是否通过早期卒中护理的质量来影响这些结局。

患者和方法

使用全国性的详细个体水平登记数据,我们分析了 2003 年至 2018 年间,30 天死亡率和 30 天再入院风险的收入相关和教育相关不平等情况如何发展。此外,我们聚焦于收入相关的不平等,应用中介分析来估计急性卒中护理质量对 30 天死亡率和 30 天再入院的中介作用。

结果

丹麦共登记了 97779 名患有首次缺血性卒中的个体患者。3.7%的患者在指数入院后 30 天内死亡,11.5%的患者在出院后 30 天内再次入院。死亡率的收入相关不平等在整个研究期间基本保持不变,从 2003-06 年的 RR0.53(95%CI:0.38;0.74)到 2015-18 年的 RR0.69(95%CI:0.53;0.89),当将高收入与低收入进行比较时(家庭收入-时间交互作用:RR1.00(95%CI:0.98-1.03))。在死亡率的教育相关不平等方面也发现了类似但不太一致的趋势(教育-时间交互作用:RR1.00(95%CI:0.97-1.04))。30 天再入院的收入相关差异小于 30 天死亡率,且随着时间的推移从 0.70(95%CI:0.58;0.83)缩小到 0.97(95%CI:0.87;1.10)。中介分析显示,护理质量对死亡率和再入院率均无系统的中介作用。然而,不能排除残留混杂可能消除了一些中介效应。

讨论和结论

卒中死亡率和再入院风险的社会经济不平等尚未消除。需要来自不同环境的额外研究,以阐明社会经济不平等对急性卒中护理质量的影响。