KTH MoveAbility Lab, Department of Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Biomech. 2023 May;152:111567. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111567. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
Muscle architecture parameters, such as the fascicle length, pennation angle, and volume, are important muscle morphology characteristics. Accurate in vivo quantification of these parameters allows to detect changes due to pathologies, interventions, and rehabilitation trainings, which ultimately impact on muscles' force-producing capacity. In this study, we compared three-dimensional (3D) muscle architecture parameters of the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medialis, which were quantified by 3D freehand ultrasound (3DfUS) and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), respectively. Sixteen able-bodied subjects were recruited where seven of them received both 3DfUS and MRI measurement, while the rest underwent 3DfUS measurements twice. Good to excellent intra-rater reliability and inter-session repeatability were found in 3DfUS measurements (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.81). Overall, the two imaging modalities yielded consistent measurements of the fascicle length, pennation angle, and volume with mean differences smaller than 2.9 mm, 1.8°, and 5.7 cm, respectively. The only significant difference was found in the pennation angle of the tibialis anterior, although the discrepancy was small. Our study demonstrated, for the first time, that 3DfUS measurement had high reliability and repeatability for measurement of muscle architecture in vivo and could be regarded as an alternative to MRI for 3D evaluation of muscle morphology.
肌肉结构参数,如肌束长度、羽状角和体积,是重要的肌肉形态特征。这些参数的准确活体定量可用于检测因疾病、干预和康复训练而导致的变化,这些变化最终会影响肌肉的产生力量的能力。在这项研究中,我们比较了三种方法测量的胫骨前肌和比目鱼肌的三维(3D)肌肉结构参数,这三种方法分别是 3D 自由hand 超声(3DfUS)和磁共振成像(MRI)技术、弥散张量成像(DTI)。我们招募了 16 名健康受试者,其中 7 名受试者同时接受了 3DfUS 和 MRI 测量,其余受试者则分别接受了两次 3DfUS 测量。3DfUS 测量的内部观察者可靠性和两次测量间的重复性良好,内部相关系数均大于 0.81。总的来说,两种成像方式得到的肌束长度、羽状角和体积的测量结果基本一致,平均差异小于 2.9mm、1.8°和 5.7cm。唯一有显著差异的是胫骨前肌的羽状角,尽管差异很小。我们的研究首次表明,3DfUS 测量具有很高的可靠性和可重复性,可用于活体肌肉结构的测量,可作为 MRI 对肌肉形态进行 3D 评估的替代方法。