• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口服抗凝剂治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析伞状评价的方案。

Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

机构信息

Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e066853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066853.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066853
PMID:37024258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10083795/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been used in antithrombotic therapy in patients with cancer, and their efficacy and safety have been evaluated in several meta-analyses. Although a large body of findings has accumulated to support the benefit of NOACs for the treatment and prevention of cancer-associated thromboembolism, there is no convincing evidence because of inconsistent results across studies and questionable data quality. Its efficacy and safety remain controversial, especially with regard to the risk of bleeding.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search PubMed, Embase and Web of science, Cochrane Library on 19 April 2022 (searches will be updated until complete) to identify systematic reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses of the efficacy and safety of NOACs for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The quality of eligible systematic evaluations will be measured by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews. For each outcome, if a random effects model is not used, we will extract the data and estimate a 95% CI using the random effects model approach. For each random effects estimate, a 95% prediction interval is calculated. Heterogeneity between studies will be quantified using the I metric. In addition, if an assessment contains at least three articles, we will reanalyse the assessment using Egger's asymmetry test to detect and visualise possible publication bias in the articles.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No formal ethical approval is required since we will use publicly available data. We will disseminate the findings of the umbrella review through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022342053.

摘要

简介

新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)已用于癌症患者的抗血栓治疗,其在几项荟萃分析中评估了疗效和安全性。尽管有大量研究结果支持 NOAC 治疗和预防癌症相关血栓栓塞的益处,但由于研究结果不一致和数据质量存在疑问,尚无令人信服的证据。其疗效和安全性仍存在争议,特别是出血风险。

方法和分析

我们将在 2022 年 4 月 19 日(搜索将持续更新至完成)搜索 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science、Cochrane Library,以确定新型口服抗凝剂治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性的系统评价、荟萃分析和汇总分析。合格系统评价的质量将通过 A 测量工具评估系统评价进行测量。对于每个结局,如果未使用随机效应模型,我们将提取数据并使用随机效应模型方法估计 95%CI。对于每个随机效应估计值,计算 95%预测区间。使用 I 度量量化研究之间的异质性。此外,如果评估包含至少三篇文章,我们将使用 Egger 的不对称检验重新分析评估,以检测和可视化文章中可能存在的发表偏倚。

伦理和传播

由于我们将使用公开可用的数据,因此不需要正式的伦理批准。我们将通过在同行评审期刊上发表和会议报告来传播伞式综述的结果。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022342053。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.新型口服抗凝剂治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析伞状评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e066853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066853.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.口服抗凝剂用于静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的一级预防、治疗和二级预防,以及用于心房颤动的卒中预防:系统评价、网状荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(9):1-386. doi: 10.3310/hta21090.
4
Prophylaxis of thromboembolism during therapy with asparaginase in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.成人急性淋巴细胞白血病患者使用门冬酰胺酶治疗期间血栓栓塞的预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 10;10(10):CD013399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013399.pub2.
5
Risk of Substantial Intraocular Bleeding With Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新型口服抗凝剂致严重眼内出血的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul;133(7):834-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0985.
6
Prediction models for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory adults with pancreatic and gastro-oesophageal cancer: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊成人胰腺和胃食管癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 4;12(3):e056431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056431.
7
Use of heparins in patients with cancer: individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials study protocol.肝素在癌症患者中的应用:随机试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 29;6(4):e010569. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010569.
8
Non-pharmacological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome: study protocol of an umbrella review of systematic review and meta-analyses.非药物治疗肠易激综合征的研究方案:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 20;9(3):e027778. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027778.
9
Wound complications and bleeding with new oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新型口服抗凝剂在全膝关节置换术患者中的伤口并发症和出血:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):500-513. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15005. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
10
Effect of statins on risk and mortality of urologic malignancies: Protocol of an umbrella review.他汀类药物对泌尿系统恶性肿瘤风险和死亡率的影响:伞状评价方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 2;17(3):e0264076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264076. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.体外冲击波疗法、超声疗法和皮质类固醇注射治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项Meta分析的汇总分析
J Orthop Traumatol. 2025 Aug 18;26(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s10195-025-00871-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring test-retest reliability (TRR) of AMSTAR provides moderate to perfect agreement - a contribution to the discussion of the importance of TRR in relation to the psychometric properties of assessment tools.测量 AMSTAR 的重测信度(TRR)提供了从中等到极好的一致性 - 这有助于讨论 TRR 相对于评估工具的心理测量特性的重要性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01231-y.
2
Comparison Between Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Asian Individuals With Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.亚洲癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞患者中新型口服抗凝药与低分子肝素的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036304. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36304.
3
Prediction and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.癌症相关血栓栓塞的预测与预防。
Oncologist. 2021 Jan;26(1):e2-e7. doi: 10.1002/onco.13569. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
4
Direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂治疗癌症相关静脉血栓栓塞症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Blood. 2020 Sep 17;136(12):1433-1441. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005819.
5
Fifty years of research on antithrombotic therapy: Achievements and disappointments.抗栓治疗 50 年研究:成就与失望。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;70:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
6
A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool.一项心理计量研究发现 AMSTAR 2 是一个有效且具有中等可靠性的评价工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Oct;114:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.028. Epub 2019 May 29.
7
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
8
New developments in anticoagulants: Past, present and future.新型抗凝药物的进展:过去、现在和未来。
Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 28;117(7):1283-1288. doi: 10.1160/TH16-10-0807. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
9
Does psychotherapy work? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.心理疗法是否有效?一项对随机对照试验荟萃分析的伞式综述。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):236-246. doi: 10.1111/acps.12713. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.对于开展医疗保健干预措施综述的研究者,有哪些可用的指南?一项范围综述和定性元总结。
Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;5(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5.