COVID-19 impact on the global neurosurgery resident training course and admission: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND

This study looks at how COVID-19 affected the admission and training of neurosurgical residents worldwide.

METHODS

From 2019 to 2021, we reviewed multiple databases (i.e., Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, and Hinari) to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on neurosurgery resident training and admission in low middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). We then utilized a Wilcoxon signed-rank test to evaluate the difference between the two LMIC/HICs and employed Levene's test to assess the homogeneity of variances.

RESULTS

There were 58 studies that met our inclusion criteria; 48 (72.4%) were conducted in HIC and 16 (27.6%) in LMIC. The admission of new residents was mostly canceled in HIC (31.7%; = 13) and in LMIC (25%; = 4) from 2019 to 2021 due to COVID-19. Learning modalities changed to include predominantly video conferencing (i.e., 94.7% [ = 54] of cases). Further, neurosurgery was largely restricted to emergency cases alone (79.6% [ = 39]), with only 12.2% ( = 6) elective cases. The result was a marked reduction in resident surgical training (i.e., 66.7% [ = 10] in LMIC and 62.9% [ = 22] in HIC), despite increased workloads in (i.e., LMIC [37.4%; = 6] and HIC [35.7%; = 15]). This was attributed to the marked reduction in the number of surgical patients allotted to each resident (i.e., LMIC [87.5%; = 14] than HIC [83.3%; = 35]).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic markedly disrupted neurosurgical education globally. Although differences have been found between LMICs and HICs training, the reduction of neurosurgical case-loads and surgical procedures has significantly impacted neurosurgical training. The question remains, how can this "loss of experience" be redressed in the future?