Department of Kinesiology & Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Molecular Cardiology Research Institute, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Exp Physiol. 2023 Jun;108(6):802-809. doi: 10.1113/EP091178. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
What is the central question of this study? Does cutaneous sensory nerve-mediated vasodilatation differ between non-Hispanic Black and White young adults? What is the main finding and its importance? The magnitude of cutaneous reactive hyperaemia is lower in non-Hispanic Black relative to non-Hispanic White young adults, but the overall sensory nerve contribution is the same, suggesting that sensory nerve function is similar in both non-Hispanic Black and White young adults.
The aim of this study was to assess cutaneous sensory nerve function, independent of nitric oxide, in non-Hispanic Black and White young adults. We tested the hypothesis that cutaneous reactive hyperaemia and sensory nerve-mediated vasodilatation would be lower in non-Hispanic Black young adults relative to non-Hispanic White young adults. Twenty-four participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black (n = 12) or non-Hispanic White (n = 12) were recruited. All participants underwent three bouts of reactive hyperaemia. An index of skin blood flow was measured continuously using laser-Doppler flowmetry at a control site and at a site treated with topical 4% lignocaine to inhibit sensory nerve function. Peak reactive hyperaemia was lower in non-Hispanic Black relative to non-Hispanic White participants (P < 0.001). Total reactive hyperaemia was lower in non-Hispanic Black [mean (SD); control, 4085 (955)%CVC s; lignocaine, 2127 (639) percent maximal cutaneous vascular conductance * seconds, %CVC s] relative to non-Hispanic White [control: 6820 (1179)%CVC s; lignocaine, 3573 (712)%CVC s] participants (P < 0.001 for both sites). There was no difference between groups for the calculated contribution of sensory nerves to either the peak [non-Hispanic Black, 25 (14)%; non-Hispanic White, 19 (13)%] or total reactive hyperaemic response [non-Hispanic Black, 48 (10)%; non-Hispanic White, 47 (10)%]. These data suggest that cutaneous reactive hyperaemia is lower in non-Hispanic Black young adults, but the sensory nerve contribution is similar in non-Hispanic Black and White young adults.
本研究的核心问题是什么?非裔美国人和白人年轻成年人之间的皮肤感觉神经介导的血管扩张是否存在差异?主要发现及其重要性是什么?与非裔美国年轻人相比,非裔白种年轻人的皮肤反应性充血程度较低,但总的感觉神经贡献是相同的,这表明非裔白种年轻人和白人年轻人的感觉神经功能相似。
本研究旨在评估非裔美国人和白人年轻成年人中皮肤感觉神经功能,而不考虑一氧化氮。我们测试了这样一个假设,即非裔美国年轻人的皮肤反应性充血和感觉神经介导的血管扩张会低于非裔美国年轻人。招募了 24 名自认为是非裔美国人(n=12)或非裔白人(n=12)的参与者。所有参与者都接受了三回合的反应性充血。使用激光多普勒流量仪连续测量皮肤血流量,在控制部位和局部应用 4%利多卡因以抑制感觉神经功能的部位进行测量。非裔美国人的峰值反应性充血低于非裔美国人(P<0.001)。非裔美国人的总反应性充血[平均值(标准差);对照组,4085(955)%CVC s;利多卡因,2127(639)%最大皮肤血管传导*秒,%CVC s]低于非裔白人[对照组:6820(1179)%CVC s;利多卡因,3573(712)%CVC s]参与者(两个部位均 P<0.001)。两组之间,感觉神经对峰值[非裔黑人,25(14)%;非裔白人,19(13)%]或总反应性充血反应[非裔黑人,48(10)%;非裔白人,47(10)%]的贡献没有差异。这些数据表明,非裔美国年轻人的皮肤反应性充血较低,但非裔美国人和白人年轻人的感觉神经贡献相似。