Brown University Graduate School, Providence, RI, USA.
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Palliat Med. 2023 May;37(5):677-691. doi: 10.1177/02692163231162888. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
Exercise is often recommended for cancer patients. However, for advanced cancer palliative care patients, it is unclear whether exercise, as a lifestyle intervention, is beneficial for palliative outcomes.
To examine randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of lifestyle exercise interventions on palliative outcomes in patients with advanced stage cancer.
Systematic review and descriptive evidence synthesis.
Pubmed/Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to 2022. Two reviewers identified articles and removed duplicates. Next two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and then assessed full-texts articles for eligibility. Finally, all six reviewers examined full-text articles for eligibility and conducted the evidence synthesis.
Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Studies were heterogeneous making direct comparisons challenging, but were grouped along three categories: aerobic, resistance, or resistance-aerobic exercises. One of three aerobic studies had positive quality-of-life outcomes. Fatigue improved in one aerobic and one combination resistance-aerobic study. Most resistance-aerobic studies and one aerobic study showed improved physical function. All resistance studies showed improvement in at least one outcome. Across all studies, ill health was the most common reason for participant dropout. The most commonly used assessment tools were: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Fatigue, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30, and accelerometer.
Current randomized controlled trials regarding effects of exercise interventions on palliative outcomes for advanced cancer patients show great variability. While studies show promise, no generalizable conclusions can be made. Further research is needed.
运动常被推荐给癌症患者。然而,对于晚期癌症姑息治疗患者,作为一种生活方式干预的运动是否对姑息治疗结局有益尚不清楚。
评估生活方式运动干预对晚期癌症患者姑息治疗结局的随机对照试验。
系统回顾和描述性证据综合。
从建库起至 2022 年,系统检索了 Pubmed/Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsychInfo 和 Web of Science。两位评审员识别文章并去除重复项。接下来,两位评审员独立筛选标题和摘要,然后评估全文文章的合格性。最后,六位评审员均检查全文文章的合格性并进行证据综合。
纳入了 8 项随机对照试验。研究存在异质性,使得直接比较具有挑战性,但可按以下三个类别进行分组:有氧运动、抗阻运动或抗阻-有氧运动。3 项有氧运动研究中有 1 项有积极的生活质量结局。1 项有氧运动和 1 项抗阻-有氧运动研究中疲劳得到改善。大多数抗阻-有氧运动研究和 1 项有氧运动研究显示身体功能改善。所有抗阻研究均显示至少有 1 项结局改善。在所有研究中,健康状况不佳是参与者退出的最常见原因。最常用的评估工具是:癌症治疗功能评估-疲劳量表、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 以及加速度计。
目前关于运动干预对晚期癌症患者姑息治疗结局影响的随机对照试验显示出很大的变异性。虽然研究显示出前景,但不能得出普遍的结论。需要进一步研究。