School of Public Administration and policy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, 250014, China.
Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, PR China.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Aug 1;339:117809. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117809. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
The harmonious coexistence of man and nature is a universally recognized standard to test the rational utilization of multifunctional territorial space, and the planning of territorial space adapted to nature is a scientific guide to balance ecological protection and human development. This study focuses on the inevitable relationship between the scale, function and pattern of territorial space utilization (TSU), and puts forward a process research framework of "background evaluation-advantage comparison-optimization conduction". Based on the evaluation of resource and environment suitability, this paper determines the scale of multifunctional territorial space through the potential conflict identification model of TSU. The location entropy method is used to identify the advantageous functions of the county level, and the matching characteristics of the research results and the current situation are obtained by comparing them with the current plan. Finally, from the county functional zoning to the regional TSU pattern, the corresponding optimization conduction path is designed to form a new development and protection pattern. The empirical results of research area show that: (1) The study area is suitable for urban construction and agricultural production as a whole. The ecological protection is mainly at the general important level, and there is a moderate potential conflict between the development and protection of territorial space. The space scale of urban construction, agricultural production and ecological protection are accounted for 8.77%, 78.71% and 12.52%, respectively. (2) The advantageous function of TSU in county-level administrative units is dominated by single advantageous function, and the number of composite advantageous functions is generally small. The advantageous functional types determined by this research have a high matching with the current plan. (3) Based on the analysis of the scale structure and functional use of territorial space, this paper defines the ecological space that should be strictly protected and the agricultural and urban space that should be moderately developed for production and construction, and sets up elastic development areas. Finally, a strategic pattern of "one corridor, two screens, three circles and four zones" is conducive to the realization of the beautiful vision of the unification of protection and development.
人与自然的和谐共生是检验多功能土地空间合理利用的普遍公认的标准,适应自然的土地空间规划是平衡生态保护与人类发展的科学指导。本研究聚焦于土地空间利用(TSU)的规模、功能和格局之间的必然关系,并提出了“背景评价-优势比较-优化传导”的过程研究框架。基于资源和环境适宜性的评价,本文通过 TSU 的潜在冲突识别模型确定多功能土地空间的规模。运用区位熵法识别县级优势功能,并将研究结果与现行规划进行比较,得出与现状相匹配的特征。最后,从县域功能分区到区域 TSU 格局,设计相应的优化传导路径,形成新的发展与保护格局。研究区域的实证结果表明:(1)研究区整体上适宜城市建设和农业生产,生态保护以一般重要为主,土地空间开发与保护存在中度潜在冲突,城市建设、农业生产和生态保护的空间规模分别占 8.77%、78.71%和 12.52%。(2)县级行政单元 TSU 的优势功能以单一优势功能为主,复合优势功能数量普遍较少。本文确定的优势功能类型与现行规划具有较高的匹配度。(3)基于土地空间规模结构和功能利用的分析,本文定义了应严格保护的生态空间和应适度进行生产建设的农业和城市空间,并设置弹性发展区。最后,构建了“一廊两屏、三圈四区”的战略格局,有利于实现保护与发展的统一的美好愿景。