• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复苏团队协作量表的编制及其心理测量学特性:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究。

Development and psychometric properties of teamwork scale in resuscitation: A sequential exploratory mixed-method study.

作者信息

Hosseini Mohammad, Heydari Abbas, Reihani Hamidreza, Kareshki Hossein

机构信息

Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jan 31;12:10. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_139_22. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_139_22
PMID:37034876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10079185/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-technical skills as a complement to technical skills have become increasingly important in cardio-pulmonary resuscitation, and teamwork is one of the most prominent of these skills. Because of the limited number of tools introduced and validated for measuring teamwork in resuscitation, this study was conducted to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Teamwork Scale in Resuscitation (TSR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was a sequential exploratory mixed-method study and was conducted between March 2020 and April 2021 and in two phases. In the first phase (qualitative), semi-structured interviews were performed with resuscitation team members who were selected using a purposeful sampling method with maximum variation in terms of experience, level of education, age, and gender. Using directed qualitative content analysis, the data were analyzed and the primary item pool was developed. In the second phase (quantitative), assessing face, content, and construct validity as well as reliability via the internal consistency and stability, the psychometric properties of the instrument are evaluated.

RESULTS

The initial tool consisted of 54 items; after assessing the face validity, ten items were removed during content validity, and the final tool consisted of 44 items and three main categories including the essential prerequisites for resuscitation, leadership, and teamwork, which was scored based on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The convergent validity and concurrent validity of the tool were confirmed. The reliability of the instrument was also confirmed using Cronbach's alpha test and re-test and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) between raters.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of TSR for measuring teamwork in resuscitation in a simulated environment are approved. Further studies are suggested for different contexts of resuscitation and with trained raters to evaluate its use in real resuscitation situations.

摘要

背景

非技术技能作为技术技能的补充,在心肺复苏中变得越来越重要,团队合作是这些技能中最突出的技能之一。由于用于评估复苏中团队合作的工具数量有限且经过验证的较少,本研究旨在开发和评估复苏团队合作量表(TSR)的心理测量特性。

材料与方法

本研究是一项顺序探索性混合方法研究,于2020年3月至2021年4月分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段(定性),对复苏团队成员进行了半结构化访谈,这些成员采用目的抽样方法选取,在经验、教育水平、年龄和性别方面具有最大差异。使用定向定性内容分析法对数据进行分析,并开发了初始项目池。在第二阶段(定量),通过内部一致性和稳定性评估表面效度、内容效度和结构效度以及信度,对该工具的心理测量特性进行评估。

结果

初始工具包含54个项目;在评估表面效度后,在内容效度阶段删除了10个项目,最终工具由44个项目和三个主要类别组成,包括复苏的基本前提条件、领导力和团队合作,根据从强烈不同意到强烈同意的5点李克特量表进行评分。该工具的收敛效度和同时效度得到了证实。还使用克朗巴赫α检验、重测以及评分者之间的组内相关系数(ICC)证实了该工具的信度。

结论

TSR在模拟环境中测量复苏团队合作的效度和信度得到认可。建议针对不同的复苏情境以及由经过培训的评分者进行进一步研究,以评估其在实际复苏情况中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/204a/10079185/2a1a3503dfb6/JEHP-12-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/204a/10079185/2a1a3503dfb6/JEHP-12-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/204a/10079185/2a1a3503dfb6/JEHP-12-10-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and psychometric properties of teamwork scale in resuscitation: A sequential exploratory mixed-method study.复苏团队协作量表的编制及其心理测量学特性:一项序贯探索性混合方法研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2023 Jan 31;12:10. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_139_22. eCollection 2023.
2
Translatability and validation of non-technical skills scale for trauma (T-NOTECHS) for assessing simulated multi-professional trauma team resuscitations.创伤非技术技能量表(T-NOTECHS)用于评估模拟多专业创伤团队复苏的可翻译性和有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 30;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1474-5.
3
Designing and psychometric evaluation of disease-related fear scale (D-RFS) in adults with epilepsy: A sequential exploratory mixed methods design.成人癫痫患者疾病相关恐惧量表(D-RFS)的设计和心理计量学评估:序贯探索性混合方法设计。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107169. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107169. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
Development and psychometric properties of Female Infertility Stigma Instrument (ISI-F): A sequential mixed method study.女性不孕耻辱量表(ISI-F)的编制及心理测量学特性:一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 30;22(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02139-5.
5
Professional Assessment Tool for Team Improvement: An assessment tool for paediatric intensive care unit nurses' technical and nontechnical skills.专业团队改进评估工具:儿科重症监护病房护士技术和非技术技能评估工具。
Aust Crit Care. 2022 Mar;35(2):159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Measuring teamwork performance: Validity testing of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) with clinical resuscitation teams.测量团队协作绩效:使用临床复苏团队对团队紧急评估工具(TEAM)进行有效性测试。
Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:97-101. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.026. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Design and psychometric properties of a questionnaire for assessing sexual and reproductive health needs of married adolescent women: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study.一份用于评估已婚青春期女性性与生殖健康需求的问卷的设计及心理测量特性:一项探索性序贯混合方法研究
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):3172-3180. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2109132. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
Resuscitation Team Members 'Experiences of Teamwork: A Qualitative Study.复苏团队成员的团队合作经历:一项定性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Sep 14;27(5):439-445. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_294_21. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
9
Rating medical emergency teamwork performance: development of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM).评估医疗急救团队协作表现:团队紧急评估工具(TEAM)的开发。
Resuscitation. 2010 Apr;81(4):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.027. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
10
Development and psychometric evaluation of the female infertility stigma instrument (ISI-F): protocol for a mixed method study.女性不孕耻辱量表(ISI-F)的编制及心理测量学评价:一项混合方法研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2020 May 24;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-0904-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric properties of the nursing ethical decision-making ability scale.护理伦理决策能力量表的编制及心理测量学特性
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01190-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Resuscitation Team Members 'Experiences of Teamwork: A Qualitative Study.复苏团队成员的团队合作经历:一项定性研究。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022 Sep 14;27(5):439-445. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_294_21. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
2
Elements of Teamwork in Resuscitation: An Integrative Review.复苏中的团队合作要素:一项综合综述
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2022 Jul;10(3):95-102. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2021.91963.1291.
3
Validity and reliability of a virtual education satisfaction questionnaire from the perspective of cardiology residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.
从心脏病学住院医师角度看 COVID-19 大流行期间虚拟教育满意度调查问卷的效度和信度
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Aug 31;10:291. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_32_21. eCollection 2021.
4
Validity and reliability properties of the Persian version of perceived health competence scale among patients with cardiovascular diseases.心血管疾病患者中波斯语版感知健康能力量表的效度和信度特性
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jan 28;10:19. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_899_20. eCollection 2021.
5
Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.改善医疗保健领域团队效能的干预措施:过去十年的系统评价。
Hum Resour Health. 2020 Jan 8;18(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12960-019-0411-3.
6
How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between teamwork and performance in healthcare teams: a systematic review and meta-analysis.团队合作究竟有多有效?医疗团队中团队合作与绩效之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e028280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028280.
7
Effective Strategies for Teaching Teamwork.团队合作教学的有效策略。
Crit Care Nurse. 2019 Aug;39(4):40-47. doi: 10.4037/ccn2019704.
8
Incivility and Clinical Performance, Teamwork, and Emotions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.无礼行为与临床绩效、团队协作及情绪:一项随机对照试验
J Nurs Care Qual. 2020 Jan/Mar;35(1):70-76. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000407.
9
Measuring the teamwork performance of teams in crisis situations: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties.测量危机情境下团队的团队协作表现:评估工具及其测量特性的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):327-337. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008260. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
10
Prediction of ICU mortality in critically ill children : Comparison of SOFA, GCS, and FOUR score.危重症儿童重症监护病房死亡率的预测:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和全面无反应量表(FOUR)评分的比较
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2019 Nov;114(8):717-723. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0484-0. Epub 2018 Oct 1.