• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国人和韩国人在办公室个人空间感知上的差异。

Differences in office-based personal space perception between British and Korean populations.

作者信息

Richardson Mike, Jicol Crescent, Taulo Gerald, Park Jaehyun, Kim Hyun K, Proulx Michael J, de Sousa Alexandra A

机构信息

CREATE Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1043088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043088. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043088
PMID:37034962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10075201/
Abstract

We sought to understand how the perception of personal space is influenced by different levels of social density, spatial density, and type of window-view in South Korean and United Kingdom workplaces. We employed virtual reality to simulate shared and single occupancy offices. We obtained personal space estimations using a virtual disc around the participant which could be extended and retracted, inside the simulation, to indicate perceived amount of personal space, and compared this measure to questionnaire-based estimations. We found that in both cultures participants experienced greater perceived personal space (1) when in a sparse rather than dense office and (2) having a view of the city outside the office. However, British, but not Korean, participants had significantly higher personal space estimations in single occupancy offices than in shared offices. These results suggest subtle cross-cultural differences in workplace experience, that could only be investigated using virtual reality.

摘要

我们试图了解在韩国和英国的工作场所中,个人空间的感知是如何受到不同程度的社会密度、空间密度和窗外景观类型影响的。我们利用虚拟现实技术来模拟共享办公空间和单人办公空间。我们通过在模拟环境中围绕参与者的虚拟圆盘来获取个人空间的估计值,该圆盘可以在模拟环境中进行伸缩,以表明个人空间的感知量,并将这一测量结果与基于问卷的估计值进行比较。我们发现,在两种文化中,参与者在以下两种情况下会感受到更大的个人空间:(1)在空间稀疏而非密集的办公室中;(2)能看到办公室外的城市景观。然而,英国参与者(而非韩国参与者)在单人办公空间中的个人空间估计值显著高于共享办公空间。这些结果表明,工作场所体验中存在微妙的跨文化差异,而这种差异只能通过虚拟现实技术进行研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d23/10075201/df5c7d1e8de7/fpsyg-14-1043088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d23/10075201/4d79c23d6b5a/fpsyg-14-1043088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d23/10075201/df5c7d1e8de7/fpsyg-14-1043088-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d23/10075201/4d79c23d6b5a/fpsyg-14-1043088-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d23/10075201/df5c7d1e8de7/fpsyg-14-1043088-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in office-based personal space perception between British and Korean populations.英国人和韩国人在办公室个人空间感知上的差异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1043088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1043088. eCollection 2023.
2
Perceived Spaciousness and Preference in Sequential Experience.连续体验中的感知空间与偏好。
Hum Factors. 2016 Nov;58(7):1069-1081. doi: 10.1177/0018720816650068. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
Depth perception in virtual reality: distance estimations in peri- and extrapersonal space.虚拟现实中的深度感知:个人周边空间和个人外部空间的距离估计
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008 Feb;11(1):9-15. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.9935.
4
Sharing the Space With the "Victim" Can Increase Help Rates. A Study With Virtual Reality.与“受害者”共处空间可提高救助率。一项虚拟现实研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 8;12:729077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729077. eCollection 2021.
5
Open Office Space: The Wave of the Future for Academic Health Centers?开放式办公空间:未来学术医疗中心的潮流?
Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):52-58. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002992.
6
Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces?个人对物理环境的控制能否减轻办公场所的分心程度?
Ergonomics. 2010 Mar;53(3):324-35. doi: 10.1080/00140130903389019.
7
Office design's impact on sick leave rates.办公室设计对病假率的影响。
Ergonomics. 2014;57(2):139-47. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.871064. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
8
Activity space, office space: Measuring the spatial movement of office workers.活动空间,办公空间:衡量上班族的空间移动情况。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Jan;98:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103600. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
9
Research on the correlation between component elements and psychological perception of the spatial form of underground commercial street corners based on virtual reality technology.基于虚拟现实技术的地下商业街街角空间形态构成要素与心理感知相关性研究
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:950593. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950593. eCollection 2022.
10
Remote hand: Hand-centered peripersonal space transfers to a disconnected hand avatar.远程手:以手部为中心的个人周边空间转移到一个断开连接的手部化身。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Nov;83(8):3250-3258. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02320-2. Epub 2021 May 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间在欧洲居家办公的六大优势与劣势
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;18(4):1826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041826.
2
Measurement of Socioeconomic Position in Research on Cardiovascular Health Disparities in Korea: A Systematic Review.韩国心血管健康差距研究中社会经济地位的测量:一项系统综述。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2019 Sep;52(5):281-291. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.19.094. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
3
Virtual reality: A game-changing method for the language sciences.
虚拟现实:语言科学的变革性方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):894-900. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01571-3.
4
The effect of facial expressions on peripersonal and interpersonal spaces.面部表情对个人周边空间和人际空间的影响。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0806-x. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition and Individual Differences in the Built Environment.我在哪里?我是谁?建成环境中的空间认知、社会认知与个体差异之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 11;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00064. eCollection 2016.
6
There or not there? A multidisciplinary review and research agenda on the impact of transparent barriers on human perception, action, and social behavior.存在与否?关于透明屏障对人类感知、行为和社会行为影响的多学科综述与研究议程。
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 15;6:1381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01381. eCollection 2015.
7
Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects?可触及空间的具身感知:我们如何应对威胁性物体?
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13 Suppl 1:S131-5. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0470-z.
8
Socio-economic Position, Gender and Health: How Do They Interact?社会经济地位、性别与健康:它们如何相互作用?
J Health Psychol. 1997 Jul;2(3):315-34. doi: 10.1177/135910539700200304.
9
Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity.50 余年来美国与职业相关的体力活动趋势及其与肥胖的关联
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019657. Epub 2011 May 25.
10
Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.虚拟现实模拟用于腹腔镜技能培训的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2004 Feb;91(2):146-50. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4407.