Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, NL-5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):894-900. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01571-3.
This paper introduces virtual reality as an experimental method for the language sciences and provides a review of recent studies using the method to answer fundamental, psycholinguistic research questions. It is argued that virtual reality demonstrates that ecological validity and experimental control should not be conceived of as two extremes on a continuum, but rather as two orthogonal factors. Benefits of using virtual reality as an experimental method include that in a virtual environment, as in the real world, there is no artificial spatial divide between participant and stimulus. Moreover, virtual reality experiments do not necessarily have to include a repetitive trial structure or an unnatural experimental task. Virtual agents outperform experimental confederates in terms of the consistency and replicability of their behavior, allowing for reproducible science across participants and research labs. The main promise of virtual reality as a tool for the experimental language sciences, however, is that it shifts theoretical focus towards the interplay between different modalities (e.g., speech, gesture, eye gaze, facial expressions) in dynamic and communicative real-world environments, complementing studies that focus on one modality (e.g., speech) in isolation.
本文将虚拟现实介绍为语言科学的一种实验方法,并对最近使用该方法回答基础心理语言学问题的研究进行了综述。本文认为,虚拟现实表明生态有效性和实验控制不应该被视为连续体上的两个极端,而应该被视为两个正交的因素。使用虚拟现实作为实验方法的好处包括,在虚拟环境中,就像在现实世界中一样,参与者和刺激之间没有人为的空间划分。此外,虚拟现实实验不一定必须包含重复试验结构或不自然的实验任务。虚拟代理在行为的一致性和可重复性方面优于实验共谋者,从而允许参与者和研究实验室之间进行可重复的科学研究。然而,虚拟现实作为实验语言科学工具的主要前景是,它将理论重点转移到动态和交际现实环境中不同模态(例如,言语、手势、眼动、面部表情)之间的相互作用上,从而补充了专注于单一模态(例如,言语)的研究。