• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

判断偏差可以用刺激反应曲线的变化来解释。

Judgement bias may be explained by shifts in stimulus response curves.

作者信息

Strang Caroline, Muth Felicity

机构信息

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

School of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Brescia University College, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 1H2.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Apr 5;10(4):221322. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221322. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.221322
PMID:37035286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10073905/
Abstract

Judgement bias, or 'optimism' and 'pessimism', has been demonstrated across many taxa, yet the cognitive mechanisms underlying this behaviour remain unclear. In an optimism paradigm, animals are trained to an association, and, if given a positive experience, behave more favourably towards 'ambiguous' stimuli. We tested whether this effect could be explained by changes to stimulus response gradients by giving bees a task where their response was tested across a wider gradient of stimuli than typically tested. In line with previous work, we found that bees given a positive experience demonstrated judgement bias, being more likely to visit ambiguous stimuli. However, bees were also less likely to visit a stimulus on the other side of the rewarded stimulus (S+), and as such had a shifted stimulus response curve, showing a diminished peak shift response. In two follow-up experiments we tested the hypothesis that our manipulation altered bees' stimulus response curves via changes to the peak shift response by reducing peak shift in controls. We found that, in support of our hypothesis, elimination of peak shift also eliminated differences between treatments. Our results point towards a cognitive explanation of 'optimistic' behaviour in non-human animals and offer a new paradigm for considering emotion-like states.

摘要

判断偏差,即“乐观”和“悲观”,已在许多生物分类群中得到证实,然而这种行为背后的认知机制仍不清楚。在一个乐观范式中,动物被训练建立一种关联,如果有过积极体验,它们会对“模糊”刺激表现出更有利的行为。我们通过给蜜蜂一项任务来测试这种效应是否可以用刺激反应梯度的变化来解释,在这项任务中,它们的反应是在比通常测试更宽的刺激梯度上进行测试的。与之前的研究一致,我们发现有过积极体验的蜜蜂表现出判断偏差,更有可能去接触模糊刺激。然而,蜜蜂也不太可能去接触奖励刺激(S+)另一侧的刺激,因此它们的刺激反应曲线发生了偏移,峰值偏移反应减弱。在两个后续实验中,我们测试了这样一个假设,即我们的操作通过减少对照组的峰值偏移来改变蜜蜂的刺激反应曲线,从而改变了峰值偏移反应。我们发现,支持我们的假设的是,消除峰值偏移也消除了不同处理之间的差异。我们的研究结果指向了对非人类动物“乐观”行为的一种认知解释,并为考虑类似情绪的状态提供了一个新的范式。

相似文献

1
Judgement bias may be explained by shifts in stimulus response curves.判断偏差可以用刺激反应曲线的变化来解释。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Apr 5;10(4):221322. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221322. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Effects of acute dopaminergic and serotonergic manipulations in the ACI paradigm depend on the basal valence of cognitive judgement bias in rats.急性多巴胺能和5-羟色胺能操作在ACI范式中的作用取决于大鼠认知判断偏差的基础效价。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;327:133-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
3
The trait 'pessimism' does not interact with cognitive flexibility but makes rats more vulnerable to stress-induced motivational deficits: Results from the attentional set-shifting task.“悲观”特质与认知灵活性不存在相互作用,但会使大鼠更容易受到应激诱导的动机缺陷影响:注意力转换任务的结果。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Sep 29;335:199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
4
Physically stressed bees expect less reward in an active choice judgement bias test.处于身体压力下的蜜蜂在积极选择判断偏差测试中预期的奖励较少。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2032):20240512. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0512. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
5
Measuring Cognitive Judgement Bias in Rats Using the Ambiguous-Cue Interpretation Test.使用模糊线索解释测试测量大鼠的认知判断偏差。
Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2017 Jan 3;78:9.57.1-9.57.22. doi: 10.1002/cpns.19.
6
Peak shift in honey bee olfactory learning.蜜蜂嗅觉学习中的峰值转移
Anim Cogn. 2014 Sep;17(5):1177-86. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0750-3. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动物的乐观、悲观与判断偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
8
Are lateralized and bold fish optimistic or pessimistic?侧化且大胆的鱼是乐观还是悲观?
Anim Cogn. 2024 Jun 4;27(1):42. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01876-4.
9
The effects of pessimism on cell-mediated immunity in rats.悲观情绪对大鼠细胞介导免疫的影响。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 3;80(Pt C):295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.04.034. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
10
Personality traits affecting judgement bias task performance in dogs (Canis familiaris).影响犬(Canis familiaris)在判断偏差任务中表现的人格特质。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25224-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of pre-session discrimination training on performance in a judgement bias test in dogs.会前歧视训练对犬判断偏差测试表现的影响。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Oct 12;27(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01905-2.
2
Physically stressed bees expect less reward in an active choice judgement bias test.处于身体压力下的蜜蜂在积极选择判断偏差测试中预期的奖励较少。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Oct;291(2032):20240512. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0512. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.基于标签的期望会影响熊蜂的激励对比效应。
Biol Lett. 2022 Mar;18(3):20210549. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0549. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Non-numerical strategies used by bees to solve numerical cognition tasks.蜜蜂用于解决数字认知任务的非数字策略。
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Feb 24;288(1945):20202711. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2711. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Optimism, pessimism and judgement bias in animals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动物的乐观、悲观与判断偏差:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Nov;118:3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Modality-specific impairment of learning by a neonicotinoid pesticide.一种新烟碱类杀虫剂对学习的特定方式损伤。
Biol Lett. 2019 Jul 26;15(7):20190359. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0359. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
5
Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens ().普通乌鸦中的负面情绪传染和认知偏差()。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 4;116(23):11547-11552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817066116. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Environmental complexity buffers against stress-induced negative judgement bias in female chickens.环境复杂性缓冲了应激引起的雌性鸡的负面判断偏差。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 29;8(1):5404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23545-6.
7
Do Insects Have Emotions? Some Insights from Bumble Bees.昆虫有情感吗?来自大黄蜂的一些见解。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Aug 23;11:157. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00157. eCollection 2017.
8
A social insect perspective on the evolution of social learning mechanisms.从群居昆虫角度看社会学习机制的进化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 25;114(30):7838-7845. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620744114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
9
Bumblebees at work in an emotion-like state.大黄蜂在类似情绪的状态下工作。
Learn Behav. 2017 Sep;45(3):207-208. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0265-2.
10
Statistical model specification and power: recommendations on the use of test-qualified pooling in analysis of experimental data.统计模型规范与效能:关于在实验数据分析中使用经检验合格的合并方法的建议。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 29;284(1851). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1850.