Suppr超能文献

糖尿病db/db小鼠脉搏波速度与主动脉壁僵硬度的分离:血压的影响

Dissociation of pulse wave velocity and aortic wall stiffness in diabetic db/db mice: The influence of blood pressure.

作者信息

McCallinhart Patricia E, Lee Yong Ung, Lee Avione, Anghelescu Mircea, Tonniges Jeffrey R, Calomeni Ed, Agarwal Gunjan, Lincoln Joy, Trask Aaron J

机构信息

Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.

Center for Cardiovascular Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 24;14:1154454. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1154454. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Vascular stiffness is a predictor of cardiovascular disease and pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the current standard for measuring vascular stiffness. Mean arterial pressure is the largest confounding variable to PWV; therefore, in this study we aimed to test the hypothesis that increased aortic PWV in type 2 diabetic mice is driven by increased blood pressure rather than vascular biomechanics. Using a combination of PWV and pressure myography, our data demonstrate no difference in passive mechanics, including outer diameter, inner diameter, compliance (Db/db: 0.0094 ± 0.0018 mm/mmHg vs. db/db: 0.0080 ± 0.0008 mm/mmHg, > 0.05 at 100 mmHg), and incremental modulus (Db/db: 801.52 ± 135.87 kPa vs. db/db: 838.12 ± 44.90 kPa, > 0.05 at 100 mmHg), in normal diabetic 16 week old mice. We further report no difference in basal or active aorta biomechanics in normal diabetic 16 week old mice. Finally, we show here that the increase in diabetic aortic pulse wave velocity at baseline was completely abolished when measured at equivalent pharmacologically-modulated blood pressures, indicating that the elevated PWV was attributed to the concomitant increase in blood pressure at baseline, and therefore "stiffness." Together, these animal model data suggest an intimate regulation of blood pressure during collection of pulse wave velocity when determining vascular stiffness. These data further indicate caution should be exerted when interpreting elevated PWV as the pure marker of vascular stiffness.

摘要

血管僵硬度是心血管疾病的一个预测指标,脉搏波速度(PWV)是目前测量血管僵硬度的标准方法。平均动脉压是影响PWV的最大混杂变量;因此,在本研究中,我们旨在验证以下假设:2型糖尿病小鼠主动脉PWV升高是由血压升高而非血管生物力学驱动的。通过结合使用PWV和压力肌动描记法,我们的数据表明,在16周龄的正常糖尿病小鼠中,被动力学方面没有差异,包括外径、内径、顺应性(Db/db:0.0094±0.0018mm/mmHg,db/db:0.0080±0.0008mm/mmHg,在100mmHg时P>0.05)和增量模量(Db/db:801.52±135.87kPa,db/db:838.12±44.90kPa,在100mmHg时P>0.05)。我们进一步报告,在16周龄的正常糖尿病小鼠中,基础或主动主动脉生物力学方面没有差异。最后,我们在此表明,当在等效的药物调节血压下测量时,糖尿病小鼠主动脉在基线时的脉搏波速度增加完全消失,这表明升高的PWV归因于基线时伴随的血压升高,因此是“僵硬度”升高。总之,这些动物模型数据表明,在测定血管僵硬度时,在收集脉搏波速度期间血压受到密切调节。这些数据进一步表明,在将升高的PWV解释为血管僵硬度的纯标记时应谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f314/10080125/8ef251950eec/fphys-14-1154454-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验