Venzke Jan, Weber Hendrik, Schlipsing Marc, Salmen Jan, Platen Petra
Department of Sports Medicine and Sports Nutrition, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Sportec Solutions GmbH (a DFL Company), Frankfurt, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2023 Mar 22;14:1142324. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1142324. eCollection 2023.
The aims of the study were to analyze metabolic power (MP) and MP derived parameters for different positions in the German Soccer Bundesliga and to evaluate if classification of high-intensity is more suited using the metabolic power approach instead of using traditional speed-based methods. 1,345 video match analysis (25 Hz) datasets from 380 players in 96 matches of the German first Bundesliga were gathered by an automatic player tracking system. Displacement (speed, acceleration, distance) and energetic (MP, energy expenditure) variables were determined. Intensity was classified utilizing conventional thresholds. Metabolic and running profiles were compared among six positional groups and between the halves of the match respectively (one-way ANOVA). Further, time spent, distance covered and energy expended at high speed (>15.5 km h) and high acceleration (>2 m s) were compared to those at high MP (>20 W kg) (one-way ANOVA) for evaluating if metabolic power is more suited to describe intensity in team sports. Main findings are that central-attacking midfielders (CAM) and central midfielders (CM) expended more energy (CAM: 59.8 ± 4.2 kJ kg; CM: 59.6 ± 3.6 kJ kg) and covered more distance (CAM: 11,494 ± 765 m; CM: 11,445 ± 638 m) than all other positions ( < 0.001). In the whole group of players, less time (t) and less energy were expended (EE) in high speed (t: 302 ± 84 s; EE: 10.1 ± 2.9 kJ kg) and at high acceleration zones (t: 147 ± 24 s; EE: 5.5 ± 1.2 kJ kg) when compared to high MP zone (t: 617 ± 141 s; EE: 20.0 ± 4.4 kJ kg) ( < 0.001). Furthermore, players covered more distance at high MP (2,464 ± 597 m) than at high speed (1,638 ± 458 m) and much less at high acceleration (359 ± 67 m) ( < 0.001). The higher activity profiles of CAM and CM compared to the other positions indicate the need for higher developed physiological performance in players of these positions. High intensity activities should be interpreted differently when using MP and displacement parameters as indicators of high intensity in soccer.
本研究的目的是分析德国足球甲级联赛中不同位置球员的代谢功率(MP)及其衍生参数,并评估使用代谢功率方法而非传统的基于速度的方法来进行高强度分类是否更合适。通过自动球员追踪系统收集了德国足球甲级联赛96场比赛中380名球员的1345个视频比赛分析(25Hz)数据集。确定了位移(速度、加速度、距离)和能量(MP、能量消耗)变量。利用传统阈值对强度进行分类。分别比较了六个位置组之间以及比赛上下半场之间的代谢和跑动概况(单因素方差分析)。此外,还比较了高速(>15.5km/h)和高加速度(>2m/s²)时与高MP(>20W/kg)时所花费的时间、覆盖的距离和消耗的能量(单因素方差分析),以评估代谢功率是否更适合描述团队运动中的强度。主要研究结果是,进攻型中场(CAM)和中场(CM)比其他所有位置消耗更多能量(CAM:59.8±4.2kJ/kg;CM:59.6±3.6kJ/kg)且覆盖更多距离(CAM:11494±765m;CM:11445±638m)(P<0.001)。在所有球员中,与高MP区域相比,高速(时间t:302±84s;能量消耗EE:10.1±2.9kJ/kg)和高加速度区域(t:147±24s;EE:5.5±1.2kJ/kg)所花费的时间和消耗的能量更少(t:617±141s;EE:20.0±4.4kJ/kg)(P<0.001)。此外,球员在高MP时覆盖的距离(2464±597m)比高速时(1638±458m)更多,而在高加速度时(359±67m)则少得多(P<0.001)。与其他位置相比,CAM和CM更高的活动概况表明这些位置的球员需要更高水平的生理表现。在足球运动中,当使用MP和位移参数作为高强度指标时,高强度活动的解释应该有所不同。