• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种供体游离 DNA 检测方法与血液基因表达谱检测方法在心脏移植中的比较。

Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation.

机构信息

UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14984. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14984. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.14984
PMID:37036133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10330254/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR.

RESULTS

A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed.

摘要

背景

供体游离 DNA(dd-cfDNA)检测是一种新兴的非侵入性筛选方法,用于检测急性排斥反应(AR)。本研究比较了两种商业上可用的 dd-cfDNA 和基因表达谱(GEP)检测在心脏移植(HTx)受者中检测 AR 的检测准确性。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,仅纳入 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受标准和扩展单核苷酸多态性(SNP)dd-cfDNA 的 HTx 患者。还与 GEP 进行了比较。比较了检测方法的相关性、准确分类和对 AR 的预测。

结果

共纳入 112 例 HTx 患者的 428 个样本进行研究。标准 SNP 阳性与扩展 SNP 检测呈正相关(p<0.001)。标准和扩展 SNP 检测的敏感性均较低(39%,p=1.0),但特异性较高(82%和 84%,p=1.0)。与标准 dd-cfDNA 相比,GEP 并未提高敏感性,特异性较差(p<0.001)。

结论

我们发现标准和扩展 SNP 检测在检测 AR 方面没有显著差异。与 GEP 检测相比,dd-cfDNA 检测的敏感性无变化,特异性提高。需要前瞻性对照研究来解决如何将 dd-cfDNA 检测最佳应用于临床实践的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/20db03260e7a/nihms-1890801-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/242369a7f44f/nihms-1890801-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/b2221bae58a2/nihms-1890801-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/20db03260e7a/nihms-1890801-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/242369a7f44f/nihms-1890801-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/b2221bae58a2/nihms-1890801-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/20db03260e7a/nihms-1890801-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation.两种供体游离 DNA 检测方法与血液基因表达谱检测方法在心脏移植中的比较。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14984. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14984. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
A novel donor-derived cell-free DNA assay for the detection of acute rejection in heart transplantation.一种新型供体来源的无细胞游离 DNA 检测方法,用于检测心脏移植中的急性排斥反应。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022 Jul;41(7):919-927. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
3
Single-center utilization of donor-derived cell-free DNA testing in the management of heart transplant patients.单中心应用供者游离 DNA 检测技术在心脏移植受者管理中的应用。
Clin Transplant. 2021 May;35(5):e14258. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14258. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Initiation of noninvasive surveillance for allograft rejection in heart transplant patients > 1 year after transplant.对移植后超过1年的心脏移植患者启动同种异体移植排斥反应的无创监测。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Mar;36(3):e14548. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14548. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
5
Noninvasive detection of graft injury after heart transplant using donor-derived cell-free DNA: A prospective multicenter study.使用供体来源的无细胞游离 DNA 无创检测心脏移植后移植物损伤:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Oct;19(10):2889-2899. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15339. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
6
Progress in Noninvasive Surveillance for Acute Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Real-World Analysis of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA-Based Surveillance Protocol.儿童心脏移植受者急性排斥非侵入性监测的进展:基于供体游离 DNA 的监测方案的真实世界分析。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Oct;38(10):e15481. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15481.
7
Clinical Utility of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Heart Transplant Recipients With Multi-Organ Transplants.多器官移植的心脏移植受者供体来源无细胞 DNA 的临床应用。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Oct;38(10):e15479. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15479.
8
Surveillance with dual noninvasive testing for acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation: Outcomes from the Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes Registry.心脏移植后采用双重非侵入性检测进行急性细胞排斥反应监测:来自 Surveillance HeartCare Outcomes 注册研究的结果。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Sep;43(9):1409-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 15.
9
Racial Differences in Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and Mitochondrial DNA After Heart Transplantation, on Behalf of the GRAfT Investigators.代表 GRAfT 研究人员的心脏移植后供体游离 DNA 和线粒体 DNA 的种族差异。
Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;17(4):e011160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.123.011160. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
10
HLA-DRB1 mismatch-based identification of donor-derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) as a marker of rejection in heart transplant recipients: A single-institution pilot study.基于 HLA-DRB1 错配的供体游离 DNA(dd-cfDNA)作为心脏移植受者排斥标志物的鉴定:单中心初步研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Aug;40(8):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming heart transplantation care with multi-omics insights.利用多组学见解变革心脏移植护理。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):710. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06772-0.
2
Tale of two assays: Comparison of modern donor-derived cell-free DNA technologies.两种检测方法的故事:现代供体来源游离DNA技术的比较
JHLT Open. 2024 Apr 1;4:100090. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100090. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Application of graft-derived cell-free DNA for solid organ transplantation.移植物无细胞游离 DNA 在实体器官移植中的应用。

本文引用的文献

1
The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients.国际心肺移植学会(ISHLT)心脏移植受者护理指南。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2023 May;42(5):e1-e141. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.015. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
The evolving use of biomarkers in heart transplantation: Consensus of an expert panel.生物标志物在心移植中的应用进展:专家小组共识。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Jun;23(6):727-735. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.02.025. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
The End of Endomyocardial Biopsy?: A Practical Guide for Noninvasive Heart Transplant Rejection Surveillance.
Front Immunol. 2024 Sep 23;15:1461480. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1461480. eCollection 2024.
4
Incidence of Acute Rejection Compared With Endomyocardial Biopsy Complications for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era.当代心脏移植患者急性排斥反应发生率与心内膜心肌活检并发症的比较
Transplantation. 2024 May 1;108(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004882. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
5
Circulating donor-derived cell-free DNA as a marker for rejection after lung transplantation.循环供体游离 DNA 作为肺移植后排斥反应的标志物。
Front Immunol. 2023 Oct 11;14:1263389. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1263389. eCollection 2023.
6
Free-Circulating Nucleic Acids as Biomarkers in Patients After Solid Organ Transplantation.游离核酸作为实体器官移植受者的生物标志物。
Ann Transplant. 2023 Aug 15;28:e939750. doi: 10.12659/AOT.939750.
心内膜心肌活检的终结?:非侵入性心脏移植排斥监测的实用指南。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Mar;11(3):263-276. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.11.002. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Combining donor derived cell free DNA and gene expression profiling for non-invasive surveillance after heart transplantation.联合供体来源的游离DNA和基因表达谱分析用于心脏移植后的无创监测
Clin Transplant. 2023 Mar;37(3):e14699. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14699. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
Donor-Derived Cell Free DNA: Is It All the Same?供体细胞游离 DNA:都一样吗?
Kidney360. 2020 Jun 19;1(10):1118-1123. doi: 10.34067/KID.0003512020. eCollection 2020 Oct 29.
6
Variability in Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Scores to Predict Mortality in Heart Transplant Recipients - A Proof-of-Concept Study.供体游离 DNA 评分预测心脏移植受者死亡率的变异性:概念验证研究。
Front Immunol. 2022 Feb 18;13:825108. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.825108. eCollection 2022.
7
Sparing the Prod: Providing an Alternative to Endomyocardial Biopsies With Noninvasive Surveillance After Heart Transplantation During COVID-19.保留心内膜心肌活检:在新冠疫情期间为心脏移植术后无创监测提供心内膜心肌活检的替代方案
CJC Open. 2022 May;4(5):479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.002. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
8
Racial disparities in cardiac transplantation: Chronological perspective and outcomes.种族差异与心脏移植:时间视角与结局
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):e0262945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262945. eCollection 2022.
9
Initiation of noninvasive surveillance for allograft rejection in heart transplant patients > 1 year after transplant.对移植后超过1年的心脏移植患者启动同种异体移植排斥反应的无创监测。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Mar;36(3):e14548. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14548. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
10
Trends in post-heart transplant biopsies for graft rejection versus nonrejection.心脏移植术后活检中关于移植物排斥与非排斥情况的趋势。
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2021 Jan 26;34(3):345-348. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1873032.