Suppr超能文献

两种供体游离 DNA 检测方法与血液基因表达谱检测方法在心脏移植中的比较。

Comparison of two donor-derived cell-free DNA tests and a blood gene-expression profile test in heart transplantation.

机构信息

UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2023 Jun;37(6):e14984. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14984. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing is an emerging screening modality for noninvasive detection of acute rejection (AR). This study compared the testing accuracy for AR of two commercially available dd-cfDNA and gene-expression profiling (GEP) testing in heart transplant (HTx) recipients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of HTx only patients who underwent standard and expanded single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) dd-cfDNA between October 2020 to January 2022. Comparison with GEP was also performed. Assays were compared for correlation, accurate classification, and prediction for AR.

RESULTS

A total of 428 samples from 112 unique HTx patients were used for the study. A positive standard SNP correlated with the expanded SNP assay (p < .001). Both standard and expanded SNP tests showed low sensitivity (39%, p = 1.0) but high specificity (82% and 84%, p = 1.0) for AR. GEP did not improve sensitivity and showed worse specificity (p < .001) compared to standard dd-cfDNA.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference between standard and expanded SNP assays in detecting AR. We show improved specificity without change in sensitivity using dd-cfDNA in place of GEP testing. Prospective controlled studies to address how to best implement dd-cfDNA testing into clinical practice are needed.

摘要

背景

供体游离 DNA(dd-cfDNA)检测是一种新兴的非侵入性筛选方法,用于检测急性排斥反应(AR)。本研究比较了两种商业上可用的 dd-cfDNA 和基因表达谱(GEP)检测在心脏移植(HTx)受者中检测 AR 的检测准确性。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察性研究,仅纳入 2020 年 10 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受标准和扩展单核苷酸多态性(SNP)dd-cfDNA 的 HTx 患者。还与 GEP 进行了比较。比较了检测方法的相关性、准确分类和对 AR 的预测。

结果

共纳入 112 例 HTx 患者的 428 个样本进行研究。标准 SNP 阳性与扩展 SNP 检测呈正相关(p<0.001)。标准和扩展 SNP 检测的敏感性均较低(39%,p=1.0),但特异性较高(82%和 84%,p=1.0)。与标准 dd-cfDNA 相比,GEP 并未提高敏感性,特异性较差(p<0.001)。

结论

我们发现标准和扩展 SNP 检测在检测 AR 方面没有显著差异。与 GEP 检测相比,dd-cfDNA 检测的敏感性无变化,特异性提高。需要前瞻性对照研究来解决如何将 dd-cfDNA 检测最佳应用于临床实践的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631c/10330254/242369a7f44f/nihms-1890801-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验