Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shock. 2023 Jun 1;59(6):864-870. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002123. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
Background: The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) Shock Classification can define shock severity. We evaluated the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) combined with the SCAI Shock Classification for mortality risk stratification. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort analysis including Mayo Clinic cardiac intensive care unit patients from 2007 to 2015. The peak VIS was calculated at 1 and 24 h after cardiac intensive care unit admission. In-hospital mortality was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 9,916 included patients, vasoactive drugs were used in 875 (8.8%) within 1 h and 2,196 (22.1%) within 24 h. A total of 888 patients (9.0%) died during hospitalization. Patients who required vasoactive drugs within 1 h had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.65; P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality rose with the VIS during the first 1 h (adjusted OR per 10 units, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.12-1.33; P < 0.001). The increase in VIS from 1 to 24 h was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR per 10 units, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.21; P < 0.001). These results were consistent in the 1,067 patients (10.9%) with cardiogenic shock. A gradient of in-hospital mortality was observed according to the VIS at 1 h and the increase in VIS from 1 to 24 h. Conclusions: Higher vasoactive drug requirements portend a higher risk of mortality, particularly a high VIS early after admission. The VIS provides incremental prognostic information beyond the SCAI Shock Classification, emphasizing the continuum of risk that exists across the spectrum of shock severity.
心血管血管造影和介入学会(SCAI)休克分类可定义休克严重程度。我们评估了血管活性-正性肌力评分(VIS)与 SCAI 休克分类联合用于死亡率风险分层。
这是一项单中心回顾性队列分析,纳入了 2007 年至 2015 年期间梅奥诊所心脏重症监护病房的患者。在心脏重症监护病房入院后 1 小时和 24 小时计算峰值 VIS。使用多变量逻辑回归评估住院死亡率。
在纳入的 9916 例患者中,在 1 小时内使用血管活性药物的有 875 例(8.8%),在 24 小时内使用的有 2196 例(22.1%)。共有 888 例患者(9.0%)在住院期间死亡。在 1 小时内需要血管活性药物的患者住院死亡率更高(调整后的优势比[OR],1.30;95%置信区间[CI],1.03-1.65;P=0.03),并且在第一个 1 小时内 VIS 升高(每增加 10 个单位调整后的 OR,1.22;95%CI,1.12-1.33;P<0.001)。从 1 小时到 24 小时 VIS 的增加与更高的住院死亡率相关(每增加 10 个单位调整后的 OR,1.16;95%CI,1.10-1.21;P<0.001)。这些结果在 1067 例(10.9%)心源性休克患者中是一致的。根据 1 小时时的 VIS 和从 1 小时到 24 小时 VIS 的增加,观察到住院死亡率的梯度。
更高的血管活性药物需求预示着更高的死亡率风险,特别是入院后早期 VIS 较高时。VIS 提供了比 SCAI 休克分类更具预后意义的信息,强调了在休克严重程度谱上存在的风险连续体。