Li Shao-Lin, Wang Qi-Qi
Center for Industrial and Business Organization, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Apr 8;44(4):1985-1997. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202205122.
In order to evaluate the effect and mechanism of energy saving and carbon reduction of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (the Policy), on the basis of measuring the energy consumption and CO emissions of GDP per unit area in 281 prefecture-level cities and above from 2003 to 2017, the influence, intermediary effect of innovation, and urban heterogeneity of the Policy on energy saving and carbon reduction were explored by using a difference-in-difference model. The results showed that:① the Policy promoted a significant reduction of 17.60% in the energy consumption intensity and 19.99% in the carbon emission intensity in the whole sample city. Based on a series of robustness tests, such as the parallel trend test, overcomed endogenous and placebo, dynamic time window and counterfactual, difference-in-difference-in-differences, and PSM-DID estimation, the above conclusions were still valid. ② Mechanism analysis showed that the Policy achieved energy saving and carbon reduction through the direct innovation intermediary effect of green invention patents as the carrier, and the indirect innovation mediation effect of the industrial structure upgrading effect caused by innovation achieved an energy-saving effect. ③ Heterogeneity analysis showed that the energy saving and carbon reduction rate of the Policy for coal-consuming provinces was 0.86% and 3.25% higher than that of non-coal-consuming provinces. The carbon reduction in the old industrial base city was 36.43% higher than that in the non-old industrial base, but the energy saving effect was 8.93% lower than that of the non-old industrial base. The range of energy saving and carbon reduction in non-resource-based cities was 31.30% and 74.95% higher than that in resource-based cities, respectively. ④ The results showed that it was necessary to strengthen the innovation investment and industrial structure upgrading in key areas such as big coal-consumption provinces, old industrial base cities, and resource-based cities, so as to give full play to the energy saving and carbon reduction effect of the Policy.
为评估《大气污染防治行动计划》(以下简称《政策》)节能减排的效果及机制,在测算2003—2017年281个及以上地级城市单位面积GDP能耗和CO排放量的基础上,运用双重差分模型探究《政策》对节能减排的影响、创新的中介效应及城市异质性。研究结果表明:①《政策》促使全样本城市能源消费强度显著降低17.60%,碳排放强度显著降低19.99%。经过平行趋势检验、克服内生性和安慰剂、动态时间窗口和反事实、三重差分以及PSM-DID估计等一系列稳健性检验,上述结论依然成立。②机制分析表明,《政策》通过以绿色发明专利为载体的直接创新中介效应实现节能减排,并且创新带来的产业结构升级效应的间接创新中介效应实现了节能效果。③异质性分析表明,《政策》对煤炭消费省份的节能减排率分别比非煤炭消费省份高0.86%和3.25%。老工业基地城市的碳减排比非老工业基地高36.43%,但节能效果比非老工业基地低8.93%。非资源型城市的节能减排幅度分别比资源型城市高31.30%和74.95%。④研究结果表明,有必要加强煤炭消费大省、老工业基地城市和资源型城市等重点地区的创新投入和产业结构升级,以充分发挥《政策》的节能减排效果。