Department of Environmental Health, Teaching Institute of Public Health of Primorje-Gorski Kotar County, Krešimirova 52a, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Department for Medical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Brace Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Mar 31;24(7):6548. doi: 10.3390/ijms24076548.
In January 2023, the derogation loophole was closed on "emergency authorisations" for the use of three out of five neonicotinoids in all EU states. In this study, we analysed the sorption/desorption behaviour and kinetic parameters of acetamiprid and thiacloprid, the two neonicotinoids that are still approved for use, either regularly or under emergency authorisations in the EU, and widely used worldwide. Sorption and desorption curves in four soils with different organic matter content were analysed using four kinetic models, namely, Lagergren's pseudo first-order model, two-site model (TSM), Weber-Morris intraparticle diffusion model and Elovich's model. Kinetic parameters were correlated to soil physico-chemical characteristics. To determine the mutual influence of soil characteristics and sorption/desorption parameters in the analysed soils, a factor analysis based on principal component analysis (PCA) was performed. Even though the two insecticides are very similar in size and chemical structure, the results showed different sorption/desorption kinetics. The model that best fits the experimental data was TSM. Thiacloprid showed a more rapid sorption compared to acetamiprid, and, in all soils, a higher proportion sorbed at equilibrium. Intra-particle diffusion seemed to be a relevant process in acetamiprid sorption, but not for thiacloprid. Desorption results showed that acetamiprid is more easily and more thoroughly desorbed than thiacloprid, in all soils. The kinetic behaviour differences stem from variations in molecular structure, causing disparate water solubility, lipophilicity, and acid-base properties.
2023 年 1 月,欧盟所有国家都关闭了对五种新烟碱类杀虫剂中三种杀虫剂的“紧急授权”的减损漏洞。在这项研究中,我们分析了噻虫嗪和噻虫胺这两种仍被批准在欧盟常规使用或根据紧急授权使用的新烟碱类杀虫剂的吸附/解吸行为和动力学参数,这两种杀虫剂在世界范围内广泛使用。使用四个动力学模型(即 Lagergren 拟一级模型、双位模型(TSM)、Weber-Morris 颗粒内扩散模型和 Elovich 模型)分析了四种不同有机质含量土壤中的吸附和解吸曲线。动力学参数与土壤理化特性相关。为了确定分析土壤中土壤特性和吸附/解吸参数的相互影响,进行了基于主成分分析(PCA)的因子分析。尽管这两种杀虫剂在大小和化学结构上非常相似,但结果显示出不同的吸附/解吸动力学。最适合实验数据的模型是 TSM。噻虫嗪的吸附速度比噻虫胺快,并且在所有土壤中,达到平衡时吸附的比例更高。颗粒内扩散似乎是噻虫胺吸附的一个相关过程,但噻虫胺不是。解吸结果表明,在所有土壤中,噻虫胺比噻虫胺更容易和更彻底地解吸。动力学行为的差异源于分子结构的变化,导致不同的水溶性、亲脂性和酸碱性质。