Renaud Mathieu, Akeju Tolutope, Natal-da-Luz Tiago, Leston Sara, Rosa João, Ramos Fernando, Sousa José Paulo, Azevedo-Pereira Henrique M V S
Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Centre for Functional Ecology, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Chemosphere. 2018 Mar;194:85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.102. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
Neonicotinoids are the most prominent group of insecticides in the world and are commercialized in over 120 countries for the control of agricultural pests mainly due to their broad-spectrum activity and versatility in application. Though non-target soil organisms are likely to be exposed during application, there is paucity of information in scientific literature regarding their sensitivity to neonicotinoids. This study attempts to fill this gap by evaluating, under laboratory conditions, the chronic toxicity of the neonicotinoids thiacloprid and acetamiprid, through their commercial formulations (CF), to the soil invertebrates Folsomia candida, Eisenia andrei and Enchytraeus crypticus. Results obtained indicate that the relative reproductive sensitivity of the test organisms can be expressed as: F. candida = E. andrei > E. crypticus (for acetamiprid CF) and E. andrei > F. candida > E. crypticus (for thiacloprid CF). To extrapolate from laboratory test results to field conditions, predicted environmental concentrations (PECs) and predicted no-effect concentrations were derived. Calculated toxicity-exposure ratios (TER = EC10/PEC) were below trigger values for acetamiprid and thiacloprid, when estimated with initial PEC. While estimated hazard quotients (HQ = PEC/PNEC), were greater than the European Commission trigger value. Therefore, with the current data under standard environmental risk assessment schemes it can be considered that the risk of thiacloprid and acetamiprid to the soil compartment is unacceptable. However, further research into the effects of these substances on different organisms is required to increase the confidence in the risk assessment estimates for instance, by calculating hazardous concentrations using species sensitivity distribution curves.
新烟碱类是世界上最主要的杀虫剂类别,已在120多个国家商业化,用于防治农业害虫,主要是因其具有广谱活性且应用广泛。尽管在施用过程中非靶标土壤生物可能会接触到新烟碱类杀虫剂,但科学文献中关于它们对新烟碱类杀虫剂敏感性的信息却很少。本研究试图通过在实验室条件下评估新烟碱类杀虫剂噻虫啉和啶虫脒的商业制剂对土壤无脊椎动物白符跳、安德爱胜蚓和隐秘恩氏蚓的慢性毒性来填补这一空白。所得结果表明,受试生物的相对繁殖敏感性可表示为:白符跳=安德爱胜蚓>隐秘恩氏蚓(针对啶虫脒商业制剂)以及安德爱胜蚓>白符跳>隐秘恩氏蚓(针对噻虫啉商业制剂)。为了将实验室测试结果外推至田间条件,推导了预测环境浓度(PEC)和预测无效应浓度。用初始PEC估算时,计算得出的毒性暴露比(TER=EC10/PEC)低于啶虫脒和噻虫啉的触发值。而估算的危害商(HQ=PEC/PNEC)则大于欧盟委员会的触发值。因此,根据标准环境风险评估方案下的现有数据,可以认为噻虫啉和啶虫脒对土壤组分的风险是不可接受的。然而,需要进一步研究这些物质对不同生物的影响,以增强风险评估估计的可信度,例如通过使用物种敏感性分布曲线计算有害浓度。