Suppr超能文献

使用拉施分析开发和验证低视力生活问卷(LIFE4LVQ):一份评估能力和独立性的问卷

Development and Validation of the Life for Low Vision Questionnaire (LIFE4LVQ) Using Rasch Analysis: A Questionnaire Evaluating Ability and Independence.

作者信息

Almpanidou Stavroula, Almaliotis Diamantis, Karamitopoulos Leonidas, Topouzis Fotios, Konstas Anastasios-Georgios, Labiris Georgios, Dardavesis Theodoros, Fountoulakis Konstantinos N, Chatzisavvas Konstantinos Ch, Karampatakis Vasileios

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

1st Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 28;12(7):2549. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072549.

Abstract

Low vision (LV) has a substantial impact on an individual's daily functionality and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly incorporated into the evaluation of this problem. The objective of this study was to describe the design of the new "Life for Low Vision Questionnaire (LIFE4LVQ)", as a measure of daily functionality in LV and to explore its psychometric properties. A total of 294 participants completed the LIFE4LVQ and the data were subjected to Rasch analysis to determine the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, including response category ordering, item fit statistics, principal component analysis, precision, differential item functioning, and targeting. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with an interval of three weeks and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used. The correlation between the questionnaire score and Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was examined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Rasch analysis revealed that for most items the infit and outfit mean square fit values were close to 1, both for the whole scale and its subscales (ability and independence). The separation index for person measures was 5.18 with a reliability of 0.96, indicating good discriminant ability and adequate model fit. Five response categories were found for all items. The ICC was 0.96 (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98), suggesting excellent repeatability of the measure. Poorer BCVA was significantly associated with worse scores (rho = 0.559, p < 0.001), indicating excellent convergent validity. The functional, 40-item LIFE4LVQ proved to be a reliable and valid tool that effectively measures the impact of LV on ability and independence.

摘要

低视力(LV)对个体的日常功能有重大影响,患者报告结局指标(PROMs)越来越多地被纳入该问题的评估中。本研究的目的是描述新的“低视力生活问卷(LIFE4LVQ)”的设计,作为衡量低视力日常功能的指标,并探索其心理测量特性。共有294名参与者完成了LIFE4LVQ,对数据进行拉施分析以确定问卷的心理测量特性,包括反应类别排序、项目拟合统计、主成分分析、精度、项目功能差异和目标定位。采用间隔三周的重测信度评估,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)。使用斯皮尔曼相关系数检验问卷得分与最佳矫正视力(BCVA)之间的相关性。拉施分析表明,对于大多数项目,无论是整个量表还是其分量表(能力和独立性),内拟合和外拟合均方拟合值均接近1。个体测量的分离指数为5.18,信度为0.96,表明具有良好的判别能力和足够的模型拟合度。所有项目均发现有五个反应类别。ICC为0.96(p<0.001;95%CI,0.93 - 0.98),表明该测量具有出色的可重复性。较差的BCVA与较差的得分显著相关(rho = 0.559,p<0.001),表明具有出色的收敛效度。功能性的、包含40个条目的LIFE4LVQ被证明是一种可靠且有效的工具,能够有效测量低视力对能力和独立性的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a732/10095134/544da12c6ee8/jcm-12-02549-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验