People and Performance, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Psychology, The Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
PeerJ. 2023 Apr 7;11:e15218. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15218. eCollection 2023.
Chronic time pressure is a common source of everyday stress and anxiety. Noting this, the Chronic Time Pressure Inventory (CTPI) was designed to measure the construct within general samples. The CTPI was validated using procedures informed by classical test theory. This identified a bifactor solution, comprising a general factor encompassing two overlapping factors: Cognitive Awareness of Time Shortage and Feeling Harried. Furthermore, the CTPI demonstrated good psychometric integrity. Explicitly, internal consistency, satisfactory convergent validity with the Perceived Stress Scale, and measurement invariance. While these outcomes indicated that the CTPI was an effective measure of chronic time pressure, the scale was not subjected to analysis of item-person functioning (., Rasch evaluation).
This study accordingly examined the psychometric properties of the CTPI using Rasch analysis. A general sample of 748 (595 females, 153 males) participants completed the measure online.
Initial findings recommended modification of the response scale. Subsequent analyses revealed unidimensionality, adequate item/person reliability, and gender invariance. Overall, findings confirmed that the CTPI was a valid instrument for assessing perceptions of chronic time pressure within general population samples. Noting the lack of items aligning with higher ability levels, future work should develop the CTPI by adding more complex positively keyed items.
慢性时间压力是日常压力和焦虑的常见来源。鉴于此,慢性时间压力量表(CTPI)旨在衡量一般样本中的该结构。CTPI 的验证程序借鉴了经典测试理论。这确定了一个双因素解决方案,包括一个包含两个重叠因素的一般因素:认知时间短缺意识和忙碌感。此外,CTPI 表现出良好的心理测量完整性。具体而言,内部一致性、与感知压力量表的满意收敛效度以及测量不变性。虽然这些结果表明 CTPI 是衡量慢性时间压力的有效工具,但该量表并未进行项目-个体功能分析(即,Rasch 评估)。
本研究使用 Rasch 分析相应地检查了 CTPI 的心理测量特性。一个由 748 名(595 名女性,153 名男性)参与者组成的一般样本在线完成了该测量。
初步结果建议修改反应量表。随后的分析显示了单维性、足够的项目/个体可靠性和性别不变性。总体而言,研究结果证实 CTPI 是评估一般人群样本中慢性时间压力感知的有效工具。鉴于缺乏与更高能力水平相匹配的项目,未来的工作应该通过添加更复杂的正向关键项目来开发 CTPI。