a Departments of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Science, Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles , California , USA.
b Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Science , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb;33(2):220-245. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
This article reviews current approaches to neuropsychological assessment, identifies opportunities for development of new methods using modern psychometric theory and advances in technology, and suggests a transition path that promotes application of novel methods without sacrificing validity.
Theoretical/state-of-the-art review.
Clinical neuropsychological assessment today does not reflect advances in neuroscience, modern psychometrics, or technology. Major opportunities for improving practice include both psychometric and technological strategies. Modern psychometric approaches including item response theory (IRT) enable linking procedures that can place different measures on common scales; adaptive testing algorithms that can dramatically increase efficiency of assessment; examination of differential item functioning (DIF) to detect measures that behave differently in different groups; and person fit statistics to detect aberrant patterns of responding of high value for performance validity testing. Opportunities to introduce novel technologies include computerized adaptive testing, Web-based assessment, healthcare- and bio-informatics strategies, mobile platforms, wearables, and the 'internet-of-things'. To overcome inertia in current practices, new methods must satisfy requirements for back-compatibility with legacy instrumentation, enabling us to leverage the wealth of validity data already accrued for classic procedures. A path to achieve these goals involves creation of a global network to aggregate item-level data into a shared repository that will enable modern psychometric analyses to refine existing methods, and serve as a platform to evolve novel assessment strategies, which over time can revolutionize neuropsychological assessment practices world-wide.
本文回顾了当前神经心理学评估的方法,确定了使用现代心理测量理论和技术进步开发新方法的机会,并提出了一条过渡路径,在不牺牲有效性的情况下促进新方法的应用。
理论/现状综述。
当今的临床神经心理学评估并没有反映神经科学、现代心理测量学或技术的进步。改善实践的主要机会包括心理测量学和技术策略。现代心理测量学方法包括项目反应理论 (IRT),能够将不同的测量方法链接到共同的量表上;自适应测试算法可以极大地提高评估效率;检验不同项目功能差异 (DIF),以检测在不同组中表现不同的测量方法;以及个体拟合统计,以检测高绩效有效性测试价值的异常反应模式。引入新技术的机会包括计算机化自适应测试、基于网络的评估、医疗保健和生物信息学策略、移动平台、可穿戴设备和“物联网”。为了克服当前实践中的惯性,新方法必须满足与传统仪器向后兼容的要求,使我们能够利用已经为经典程序积累的丰富有效性数据。实现这些目标的途径包括创建一个全球网络,将项目级数据汇总到一个共享存储库中,这将使现代心理测量学分析能够改进现有的方法,并作为一个平台来发展新的评估策略,这些策略将在未来彻底改变全球的神经心理学评估实践。