Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Department of Hematology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
Ann Hematol. 2023 Oct;102(10):2909-2922. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05209-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
Although exposure-directed busulfan (BU) dosing can improve allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes, there is still large variability in BU exposure with test dose alone due to changes in BU clearance caused by drug interactions. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial using the combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy (PK-guided group) and compared the outcomes with an external historical cohort receiving a fixed-dose (fixed-dose group). The first eight and second eight doses were adjusted based on the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of the test and first doses, respectively, targeting a total AUC of 82.1 mg·h/L. All patients received either BU and cyclophosphamide conditioning (BU/CY) or fludarabine (FLU)-containing conditioning. The BU clearance at the first dose decreased more in patients receiving FLU than in those receiving BU/CY; however, BU clearance also declined over time in patients who received BU/CY. The simulated total AUC (sAUC) with test dose only was significantly higher in patients who received FLU than in those who received BU/CY, but sAUC with the combined strategy was comparable. The 100-day progression-free survival was 85.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.9-92.8%), and was not inferior to that in the fixed-dose group. For the FLU-containing regimens, the PK-guided group showed decreased relapse (0.0% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.03), and favorable overall survival (75.1% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.07) at 1 year. The combined strategy effectively controlled the BU exposure close to the target levels, potentially improving efficacy, especially in patients receiving the FLU-containing regimen. Clinical evaluation of efficacy of dose-modified intravenous busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancy (#UMIN000014077, June 15th, 2014).
尽管基于暴露的白消安(BU)剂量调整可改善异基因造血干细胞移植的结果,但由于药物相互作用导致 BU 清除率的变化,仅通过测试剂量仍存在较大的 BU 暴露变异性。我们采用联合测试剂量和治疗药物监测策略(PK 指导组)进行了一项单臂 II 期试验,并将结果与接受固定剂量(固定剂量组)的外部历史队列进行比较。根据测试和第一剂量的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC),分别调整前 8 个和后 8 个剂量,目标总 AUC 为 82.1mg·h/L。所有患者均接受 BU 和环磷酰胺预处理(BU/CY)或包含氟达拉滨的预处理。接受 FLU 预处理的患者的 BU 首剂量清除率下降幅度大于接受 BU/CY 预处理的患者,但接受 BU/CY 预处理的患者的 BU 清除率也随时间推移而下降。仅通过测试剂量模拟的总 AUC(sAUC)在接受 FLU 的患者中明显高于接受 BU/CY 的患者,但联合策略的 sAUC 相当。100 天无进展生存率为 85.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:71.9-92.8%),与固定剂量组无差异。对于包含 FLU 的方案,PK 指导组显示复发率降低(0.0%比 26.9%,p=0.03),1 年总生存率提高(75.1%比 57.0%,p=0.07)。联合策略可有效控制 BU 暴露接近目标水平,特别是在接受包含 FLU 的方案的患者中,可能提高疗效。剂量调整的静脉注射白消安在血液恶性肿瘤异基因造血干细胞移植中的疗效评价 (#UMIN000014077,2014 年 6 月 15 日)。