• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴露导向型白消安联合试验剂量和治疗药物监测策略的效果。

Effects of combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy in exposure-directed busulfan.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto University, 54, Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Department of Hematology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2023 Oct;102(10):2909-2922. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05209-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00277-023-05209-2
PMID:37052663
Abstract

Although exposure-directed busulfan (BU) dosing can improve allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes, there is still large variability in BU exposure with test dose alone due to changes in BU clearance caused by drug interactions. We conducted a single-arm phase II trial using the combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy (PK-guided group) and compared the outcomes with an external historical cohort receiving a fixed-dose (fixed-dose group). The first eight and second eight doses were adjusted based on the area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) of the test and first doses, respectively, targeting a total AUC of 82.1 mg·h/L. All patients received either BU and cyclophosphamide conditioning (BU/CY) or fludarabine (FLU)-containing conditioning. The BU clearance at the first dose decreased more in patients receiving FLU than in those receiving BU/CY; however, BU clearance also declined over time in patients who received BU/CY. The simulated total AUC (sAUC) with test dose only was significantly higher in patients who received FLU than in those who received BU/CY, but sAUC with the combined strategy was comparable. The 100-day progression-free survival was 85.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 71.9-92.8%), and was not inferior to that in the fixed-dose group. For the FLU-containing regimens, the PK-guided group showed decreased relapse (0.0% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.03), and favorable overall survival (75.1% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.07) at 1 year. The combined strategy effectively controlled the BU exposure close to the target levels, potentially improving efficacy, especially in patients receiving the FLU-containing regimen. Clinical evaluation of efficacy of dose-modified intravenous busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancy (#UMIN000014077, June 15th, 2014).

摘要

尽管基于暴露的白消安(BU)剂量调整可改善异基因造血干细胞移植的结果,但由于药物相互作用导致 BU 清除率的变化,仅通过测试剂量仍存在较大的 BU 暴露变异性。我们采用联合测试剂量和治疗药物监测策略(PK 指导组)进行了一项单臂 II 期试验,并将结果与接受固定剂量(固定剂量组)的外部历史队列进行比较。根据测试和第一剂量的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC),分别调整前 8 个和后 8 个剂量,目标总 AUC 为 82.1mg·h/L。所有患者均接受 BU 和环磷酰胺预处理(BU/CY)或包含氟达拉滨的预处理。接受 FLU 预处理的患者的 BU 首剂量清除率下降幅度大于接受 BU/CY 预处理的患者,但接受 BU/CY 预处理的患者的 BU 清除率也随时间推移而下降。仅通过测试剂量模拟的总 AUC(sAUC)在接受 FLU 的患者中明显高于接受 BU/CY 的患者,但联合策略的 sAUC 相当。100 天无进展生存率为 85.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:71.9-92.8%),与固定剂量组无差异。对于包含 FLU 的方案,PK 指导组显示复发率降低(0.0%比 26.9%,p=0.03),1 年总生存率提高(75.1%比 57.0%,p=0.07)。联合策略可有效控制 BU 暴露接近目标水平,特别是在接受包含 FLU 的方案的患者中,可能提高疗效。剂量调整的静脉注射白消安在血液恶性肿瘤异基因造血干细胞移植中的疗效评价 (#UMIN000014077,2014 年 6 月 15 日)。

相似文献

1
Effects of combined test dose and therapeutic drug monitoring strategy in exposure-directed busulfan.暴露导向型白消安联合试验剂量和治疗药物监测策略的效果。
Ann Hematol. 2023 Oct;102(10):2909-2922. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05209-2. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
2
Feasibility and Efficacy of a Pharmacokinetics-Guided Busulfan Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide as Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis in Adult Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中,采用移植后环磷酰胺作为移植物抗宿主病预防的同种异体干细胞移植中,基于药代动力学指导的白消安预处理方案的可行性和疗效。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Nov;27(11):912.e1-912.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
3
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of busulfan when combined with melphalan as conditioning in adult autologous stem cell transplant recipients.美法仑联合白消安作为成人自体干细胞移植受者预处理时的药代动力学和药效学。
Ann Hematol. 2018 Dec;97(12):2509-2518. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3447-x. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Comparative effectiveness of busulfan/cyclophosphamide versus busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.同种异体造血细胞移植治疗急性髓系白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征中马利兰/环磷酰胺与马利兰/氟达拉滨清髓性预处理方案的疗效比较。
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2020 Sep;13(3):160-165. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
5
Use of an Oral Busulfan Test Dose in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Treated With or Without Fludarabine.口服白消安试验剂量在接受或未接受氟达拉滨治疗的造血干细胞移植患者中的应用。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;56(12):1555-1562. doi: 10.1002/jcph.758. Epub 2016 May 20.
6
Pharmacokinetic targeting of intravenous busulfan reduces conditioning regimen related toxicity following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia.静脉注射白消安的药代动力学靶向治疗可降低急性髓系白血病异基因造血细胞移植后与预处理方案相关的毒性。
J Hematol Oncol. 2010 Oct 6;3:36. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-3-36.
7
Fludarabine and exposure-targeted busulfan compares favorably with busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: maintaining efficacy with less toxicity.氟达拉滨和暴露靶向的白消安与基于白消安/环磷酰胺的方案相比在儿科造血细胞移植中具有优势:以更少的毒性维持疗效。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014 Mar;20(3):345-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.11.027. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
8
[A comparison of toxicity and efficacy between busulfan plus fludarabine and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia].白消安联合氟达拉滨与白消安联合环磷酰胺用于急性髓系白血病异基因造血干细胞移植的毒性和疗效比较
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;51(11):880-4.
9
Busulfan and cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimen still holds the promise of being a safe and efficacious regimen for allogeneic transplantation in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia, even in high risk.基于白消安和环磷酰胺的预处理方案仍然有望成为输血依赖型地中海贫血患者异基因移植的一种安全有效的方案,即使是高危患者。
Eur J Haematol. 2022 Nov;109(5):447-457. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13825. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
10
Single Daily Busulfan Dosing for Infants with Nonmalignant Diseases Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Transplantation.对接受异基因造血祖细胞移植减强度预处理的非恶性疾病婴儿每日单次给予白消安。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Sep;21(9):1612-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.05.017. Epub 2015 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptive dosing of high-dose busulfan in real-world adult patients undergoing haematopoietic cell transplant conditioning.造血细胞移植预处理的成年患者中高剂量白消安的适应性给药
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1171-1181. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16343. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Fractionated busulfan myeloablative conditioning improves survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.分次布美他尼烷化预处理可改善老年急性髓细胞白血病和骨髓增生异常综合征患者的生存。
Cancer. 2021 May 15;127(10):1598-1605. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33383. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
2
Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.静脉用白消安在儿科患者中的药代动力学和药效学评价。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2021 Jan;60(1):17-51. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00947-2. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
3
Targeted-dose of busulfan: Higher risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome observed with systemic exposure dose above 5000 µMol⸱min. A historically controlled clinical trial.
靶向剂量的白消安:全身暴露剂量超过 5000 µMol⸱min 时,观察到更高的窦状隙阻塞综合征风险。一项历史性对照临床试验。
Hematol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(5):773-781. doi: 10.1002/hon.2789. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
A semi-mechanistic model based on glutathione depletion to describe intra-individual reduction in busulfan clearance.基于谷胱甘肽耗竭的半机械论模型来描述个体内部降低的白消安清除率。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Aug;86(8):1499-1509. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14256. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
5
Chimerism in Myeloid Malignancies following Stem Cell Transplantation Using FluBu4 with and without Busulfan Pharmacokinetics versus BuCy.使用含氟马磷酰胺(FluBu4)联合或不联合白消安的干细胞移植后髓系恶性肿瘤中的嵌合体:白消安药代动力学与白消安-环磷酰胺方案对比
Adv Hematol. 2017;2017:8690416. doi: 10.1155/2017/8690416. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
6
Test Dose Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients Receiving Once-Daily IV Busulfan Conditioning for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Reliable Approach?每日一次静脉注射白消安预处理的儿科患者的测试剂量药代动力学:可靠的方法?
J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;58(3):332-339. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1049. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
7
HLA haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation using clofarabine and busulfan for refractory pediatric hematological malignancy.使用氯法拉滨和白消安进行HLA单倍型相合造血细胞移植治疗难治性小儿血液恶性肿瘤
Int J Hematol. 2017 May;105(5):686-691. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2187-3. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Fludarabine with pharmacokinetically guided IV busulfan is superior to fixed-dose delivery in pretransplant conditioning of AML/MDS patients.在急性髓系白血病/骨髓增生异常综合征患者的移植前预处理中,氟达拉滨联合药代动力学指导的静脉注射白消安优于固定剂量给药。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Apr;52(4):580-587. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.322. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis.白消安暴露与儿童及青年造血细胞移植后的生存及毒性的关联:一项多中心回顾性队列分析
Lancet Haematol. 2016 Nov;3(11):e526-e536. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30114-4. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Personalizing Busulfan-Based Conditioning: Considerations from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Practice Guidelines Committee.基于白消安预处理方案的个体化:来自美国血液和骨髓移植学会实践指南委员会的考量
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Nov;22(11):1915-1925. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 29.