• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

检测青少年聋人手语使用者阅读时基于语音的语音再编码。

Examining speech-based phonological recoding during reading for adolescent deaf signers.

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jul;152(7):1995-2007. doi: 10.1037/xge0001362. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1037/xge0001362
PMID:37053399
Abstract

Much of the debate regarding literacy development in deaf and hard-of-hearing readers surrounds whether there is dependence on phonological decoding of print to speech for such readers, and the literature is mixed. While some reports of deaf children and adults demonstrate the influence of speech-based processing during reading, others find little to no evidence of speech-sound activation. In order to examine the role of speech-based phonological codes when reading, we utilized eye-tracking to examine eye-gaze behaviors employed by deaf children and a control group of hearing primary-school children when encountering target words in sentences. The target words were of three types: correct, homophonic errors, and nonhomophonic errors. We examined eye-gaze fixations when first encountering target words and, if applicable, when rereading those words. The results revealed that deaf and hearing readers differed in their eye-movement behaviors when re-reading the words, but they did not demonstrate differences for first encounters with the words. Hearing readers treated homophonic and nonhomophonic error words differently during their second encounter with the target while deaf readers did not, suggesting that deaf signers did not engage in phonological decoding to the same degree as hearing readers did. Further, deaf signers performed fewer overall regressions to target words than hearing readers, suggesting that they depended less on regressions to resolve errors in the text. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

关于聋人和听力障碍读者的读写能力发展,很大一部分争议围绕着他们是否依赖于将印刷品的语音解码为语音来进行阅读,而文献则存在分歧。虽然一些关于聋童和成年聋人的报告表明,在阅读过程中存在基于语音的处理影响,但其他报告则几乎没有发现语音激活的证据。为了研究基于语音的语音编码在阅读中的作用,我们利用眼动追踪技术,观察聋童和一组听力正常的小学生在句子中遇到目标词时的眼球注视行为。目标词有三种类型:正确词、同音异义词和非同音异义词。我们检查了首次遇到目标词时以及重读这些词时的眼球注视固定点。结果表明,聋人和听力读者在重读这些词时的眼球运动行为存在差异,但在首次遇到这些词时没有差异。听力读者在第二次遇到目标词时对同音异义词和非同音异义词的处理方式不同,而聋读者则没有,这表明聋人签名者没有像听力读者那样进行语音解码。此外,聋人签名者的目标词整体回扫次数比听力读者少,这表明他们对回扫的依赖程度低于听力读者,以解决文本中的错误。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Examining speech-based phonological recoding during reading for adolescent deaf signers.检测青少年聋人手语使用者阅读时基于语音的语音再编码。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Jul;152(7):1995-2007. doi: 10.1037/xge0001362. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
2
Orthographic and phonological activation in Hong Kong deaf readers: An eye-tracking study.香港聋人读者的正字法和语音激活:一项眼动追踪研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Dec;73(12):2217-2235. doi: 10.1177/1747021820940223. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
What eye fixations tell us about phonological recoding during reading.眼动注视能告诉我们关于阅读过程中语音编码的哪些信息。
Can J Exp Psychol. 1993 Jun;47(2):153-78. doi: 10.1037/h0078818.
4
The contribution of phonological knowledge, memory, and language background to reading comprehension in deaf populations.语音知识、记忆和语言背景对聋人群体阅读理解的影响。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 25;6:1153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01153. eCollection 2015.
5
The N170 ERP component differs in laterality, distribution, and association with continuous reading measures for deaf and hearing readers.N170 事件相关电位成分在左右侧、分布和与聋人和听力读者的连续阅读测量的关联上存在差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:298-309. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Mapping the reading circuitry for skilled deaf readers: an fMRI study of semantic and phonological processing.为熟练聋读者绘制阅读回路:一项关于语义和语音处理的 fMRI 研究。
Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
Chinese deaf readers have early access to parafoveal semantics.中国聋人读者能够较早获取副中央凹语义信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):254-61. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000035. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study.聋人读者中早期使用语音代码:一项 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Nov;106:261-279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish.无声阅读:来自西班牙语熟练聋读者的 ERP 证据。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5202. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84490-5.
10
Deaf readers use leftward information to read more efficiently: Evidence from eye tracking.聋读者使用左向信息来更高效地阅读:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Oct;77(10):2098-2110. doi: 10.1177/17470218241232407. Epub 2024 Mar 7.