Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, San Diego State University, 6495 Alvarado Road, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.
Brain Lang. 2013 Aug;126(2):169-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
We examined word-level reading circuits in skilled deaf readers whose primary language is American Sign Language, and hearing readers matched for reading ability (college level). During fMRI scanning, participants performed a semantic decision (concrete concept?), a phonological decision (two syllables?), and a false-font control task (string underlined?). The groups performed equally well on the semantic task, but hearing readers performed better on the phonological task. Semantic processing engaged similar left frontotemporal language circuits in deaf and hearing readers. However, phonological processing elicited increased neural activity in deaf, relative to hearing readers, in the left precentral gyrus, suggesting greater reliance on articulatory phonological codes, and in bilateral parietal cortex, suggesting increased phonological processing effort. Deaf readers also showed stronger anterior-posterior functional segregation between semantic and phonological processes in left inferior prefrontal cortex. Finally, weaker phonological decoding ability did not alter activation in the visual word form area for deaf readers.
我们研究了熟练的聋人阅读者的单词级阅读回路,他们的母语是美国手语,以及听力阅读者按阅读能力匹配(大学水平)。在 fMRI 扫描期间,参与者执行语义决策(具体概念?)、语音决策(两个音节?)和虚假字体控制任务(下划线字符串?)。两组在语义任务上表现相当,但听力阅读者在语音任务上表现更好。语义处理在聋人和听力阅读者中都激活了相似的左侧额颞叶语言回路。然而,与听力阅读者相比,语音处理在聋人左侧中央前回引起了更高的神经活动,表明对发音语音码的更大依赖,在双侧顶叶皮层引起了更高的语音处理努力。聋人阅读者还表现出左侧下前额叶皮层中语义和语音过程之间更强的前后功能分离。最后,较弱的语音解码能力并没有改变聋人视觉词形区的激活。