Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, APHP-Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers INSERM UMR-S 1138, Paris, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Jun;186:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.018. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are rare entities with a poor outcome. First-line metastatic treatment is based on gemcitabine + platinum chemotherapy (GC) regimen but retrospective data suggest enhanced anti-tumour activity with the addition of bevacizumab. Therefore, we performed a prospective assessment of the safety and efficacy of GC + bevacizumab in metastatic RMC/CDC.
We conducted a phase 2 open-label trial in 18 centres in France in patients with metastatic RMC/CDC and no prior systemic treatment. Patients received bevacizumab plus GC up to 6 cycles followed, for non-progressive disease, by maintenance therapy with bevacizumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The co-primary end-points were objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months (ORR-6; PFS-6). PFS, overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end-points. At interim analysis, the trial was closed due to toxicity and lack of efficacy.
From 2015 to 2019, 34 of the 41 planned patients have been enroled. After a median follow-up of 25 months, ORR-6 and PFS-6 were 29.4% and 47.1%, respectively. Median OS was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.6-24.2). Seven patients (20.6%) discontinued bevacizumab because of toxicities (hypertension, proteinuria, colonic perforation). Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 82% patients, the most common being haematologic toxicities and hypertension. Two patients experienced grade 5 toxicity (subdural haematoma related to bevacizumab and encephalopathy of unknown origin).
Our study showed no benefit for bevacizumab added to chemotherapy in metastatic RMC and CDC with higher than expected toxicity. Consequently, GC regimen remains a therapeutic option for RMC/CDC patients.
肾髓质癌(RMC)和集合管癌(CDC)是罕见的实体瘤,预后较差。一线转移性治疗基于吉西他滨+铂类化疗(GC)方案,但回顾性数据表明,添加贝伐珠单抗可增强抗肿瘤活性。因此,我们在法国的 18 个中心进行了一项前瞻性评估转移性 RMC/CDC 患者中 GC+贝伐珠单抗治疗的安全性和有效性的研究。
我们在法国的 18 个中心进行了一项开放标签的 2 期临床试验,入组的患者为转移性 RMC/CDC 且无既往全身治疗的患者。患者接受贝伐珠单抗+GC 治疗,最多 6 个周期,随后对于非进展性疾病,给予贝伐珠单抗维持治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可耐受的毒性。主要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)和 6 个月无进展生存(PFS-6)。次要终点是 PFS、总生存(OS)和安全性。在中期分析时,由于毒性和疗效不佳,试验提前关闭。
在 2015 年至 2019 年期间,共入组了计划的 41 例患者中的 34 例。中位随访 25 个月后,ORR-6 和 PFS-6 分别为 29.4%和 47.1%。中位 OS 为 11.1 个月(95%置信区间:7.6-24.2)。7 例患者(20.6%)因毒性(高血压、蛋白尿、结肠穿孔)停用贝伐珠单抗。82%的患者发生了 3-4 级毒性,最常见的是血液学毒性和高血压。2 例患者发生了 5 级毒性(与贝伐珠单抗相关的硬膜下血肿和原因不明的脑病)。
我们的研究表明,在转移性 RMC 和 CDC 中,添加贝伐珠单抗并未使化疗获益,且毒性高于预期。因此,GC 方案仍然是 RMC/CDC 患者的治疗选择。