• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交网络中对阴谋论的假设共识保护偏执个体免受痛苦。

Assumed shared belief about conspiracy theories in social networks protects paranoid individuals against distress.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Kavli Institute for Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 13;13(1):6084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33305-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-33305-w
PMID:37055504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10100615/
Abstract

Paranoia is the belief that others intend you harm. It is related to conspiracy theories, wherein those others represent an organized faction, coordinating the harm against self and others, and violating societal norms. Current psychological studies of paranoid conspiracy theorizing focus either on the individual or their broader social network. Likewise, theories of belief formation and updating often contain individual level processes as well as broader interpersonal and organizational factors. Here we examine paranoia and conspiracy theorizing in terms of individual behavioral predictors (performance on a probabilistic reversal learning task which assays belief updating) as well as social sensing: we ask participants to report the features of their social network, including whether their friends and acquaintances share their paranoid conspiratorial beliefs. We find that people who believe paranoid conspiracy theories expect more volatility during the task. They also assume that members of their social network share their paranoid beliefs. Critically, those participants with larger social networks and greater assumed shared belief tend to harbor their conspiratorial beliefs with less emotional distress and expect less volatility in the task. This is evidence that, like political and religious beliefs, conspiracy theories may flourish under a sacred canopy of belief consensus. These data suggest that friends and acquaintances may serve as sources of credulity and moving between them may sustain conspiracy beliefs when there is detraction. This hybrid individual/social account may shed light on clinical paranoia and persecutory delusion, wherein disability is defined normatively, and social supports are fewer.

摘要

偏执狂是指认为他人有意伤害自己的信念。它与阴谋论有关,在阴谋论中,那些他人代表着一个有组织的派别,协调对自己和他人的伤害,并违反社会规范。当前对偏执狂阴谋论的心理学研究要么关注个体,要么关注他们更广泛的社交网络。同样,信仰形成和更新的理论通常包含个体层面的过程以及更广泛的人际和组织因素。在这里,我们根据个体行为预测因子(在评估信念更新的概率反转学习任务中的表现)以及社会感知来研究偏执狂和阴谋论:我们要求参与者报告他们社交网络的特征,包括他们的朋友和熟人是否分享他们的偏执阴谋论信仰。我们发现,相信偏执阴谋论的人在任务中预期会有更大的波动性。他们还假设他们的社交网络成员也持有偏执的信念。关键是,那些拥有更大社交网络和更多假设共同信念的参与者,在持有阴谋论信仰时,情绪困扰较少,并且在任务中预期的波动性较小。这表明,与政治和宗教信仰一样,阴谋论可能在信仰共识的神圣掩护下蓬勃发展。这些数据表明,朋友和熟人可能是轻信的来源,当出现分歧时,在他们之间转移可能会维持阴谋论信仰。这种混合的个体/社会解释可能有助于阐明临床上的偏执狂和迫害妄想,其中残疾是根据规范来定义的,社会支持较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/639b229f0787/41598_2023_33305_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/45a4f57e4ad2/41598_2023_33305_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/179d8095b1b3/41598_2023_33305_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/639b229f0787/41598_2023_33305_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/45a4f57e4ad2/41598_2023_33305_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/179d8095b1b3/41598_2023_33305_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b3d7/10101958/639b229f0787/41598_2023_33305_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assumed shared belief about conspiracy theories in social networks protects paranoid individuals against distress.社交网络中对阴谋论的假设共识保护偏执个体免受痛苦。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 13;13(1):6084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33305-w.
2
Different learning aberrations relate to delusion-like beliefs with different contents.不同的学习偏差与具有不同内容的类妄想信念相关。
Brain. 2024 Aug 1;147(8):2854-2866. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae122.
3
Why conspiracy theorists are not always paranoid: Conspiracy theories and paranoia form separate factors with distinct psychological predictors.为什么阴谋论者并不总是偏执狂:阴谋论和偏执狂形成了具有不同心理预测因素的独立因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0259053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259053. eCollection 2022.
4
[Are conspiracy theorists psychotic? A comparison between conspiracy theories and paranoid delusions].[阴谋论者患有精神病吗?阴谋论与偏执妄想的比较]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2021;63(11):775-781.
5
Belief Updating and Paranoia in Individuals With Schizophrenia.精神分裂症个体的信念更新与偏执。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;7(11):1149-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
Paranoia as a deficit in non-social belief updating.偏执狂作为非社会信念更新的缺陷。
Elife. 2020 May 26;9:e56345. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56345.
7
Thinking Preferences and Conspiracy Belief: Intuitive Thinking and the Jumping to Conclusions-Bias as a Basis for the Belief in Conspiracy Theories.思维偏好与阴谋论信念:直觉思维以及急于下结论偏差作为相信阴谋论的基础
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 18;11:568942. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.568942. eCollection 2020.
8
Paranoid beliefs and conspiracy mentality are associated with different forms of mistrust: A three-nation study.偏执信念与阴谋心态与不同形式的不信任有关:一项三国研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 18;13:1023366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023366. eCollection 2022.
9
Mistrust and Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Differently Mediate the Effects of Psychological Factors on Propensity for COVID-19 Vaccine.对阴谋论的不信任和信念对心理因素影响新冠疫苗接种倾向的作用存在不同的中介效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 7;12:683684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683684. eCollection 2021.
10
Differentiating paranoia and conspiracy mentality using a network approach.使用网络方法区分偏执狂和阴谋心态。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 20;13(1):22732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47923-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Information from social ties predicts conspiracy beliefs: Evidence from the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.来自社会关系的信息可预测阴谋论信念:来自唐纳德·特朗普遇刺未遂事件的证据。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 14;4(6):pgaf193. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf193. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Social identification and paranoia.社会认同与偏执狂。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 19;11(6):231961. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231961. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Lesions to the mediodorsal thalamus, but not orbitofrontal cortex, enhance volatility beliefs linked to paranoia.

本文引用的文献

1
The computational relationship between reinforcement learning, social inference, and paranoia.强化学习、社会推理和妄想之间的计算关系。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jul 25;18(7):e1010326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010326. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Paranoia and conspiracy thinking.偏执与阴谋论思维。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101362. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101362. Epub 2022 May 28.
3
The devil is in the task structure.魔鬼存在于任务结构中。
中脑背内侧核损伤,但眶额皮质未损伤,增强了与偏执有关的波动性信念。
Cell Rep. 2024 Jun 25;43(6):114355. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114355. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
4
Conspiracy beliefs and perceptual inference in times of political uncertainty.政治不确定性时期的阴谋论信念与感知推理
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 18;14(1):9001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59434-4.
5
Different learning aberrations relate to delusion-like beliefs with different contents.不同的学习偏差与具有不同内容的类妄想信念相关。
Brain. 2024 Aug 1;147(8):2854-2866. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae122.
6
Current and future directions for research on hallucinations and delusions.幻觉和妄想研究的现状和未来方向。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 10;14(1):8328. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57472-6.
7
Beyond Addiction: Rethinking Problematic Internet use from a Motivational Framework.超越成瘾:从动机框架重新思考问题性互联网使用
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2023 Dec;20(6):471-478. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230601.
8
Can the Predictive Processing Framework Explain the Persistence of Delusional Beliefs?预测性加工框架能解释妄想信念的持续性吗?
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Nov 29;49(6):1411-1413. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad124.
9
An Active-Inference Approach to Second-Person Neuroscience.主动推理视角下的第二人称神经科学
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Nov;19(6):931-951. doi: 10.1177/17456916231188000. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
Elife. 2022 Apr 27;11:e78930. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78930.
4
Belief Updating and Paranoia in Individuals With Schizophrenia.精神分裂症个体的信念更新与偏执。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2022 Nov;7(11):1149-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Why conspiracy theorists are not always paranoid: Conspiracy theories and paranoia form separate factors with distinct psychological predictors.为什么阴谋论者并不总是偏执狂:阴谋论和偏执狂形成了具有不同心理预测因素的独立因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0259053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259053. eCollection 2022.
6
Knowing me, knowing you: Interpersonal similarity improves predictive accuracy and reduces attributions of harmful intent.知己知彼:人际相似性提高预测准确性,减少恶意归因。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105098. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105098. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
7
Dopaminergic challenge dissociates learning from primary versus secondary sources of information.多巴胺能挑战将学习与信息的主要和次要来源区分开来。
Elife. 2022 Mar 15;11:e74893. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74893.
8
Factors affecting conspiracy theory endorsement in paranoia.影响偏执狂中阴谋论认同的因素。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jan 26;9(1):211555. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211555. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
The QAnon Conspiracy Theory and the Assessment of Its Believers.QAnon 阴谋论及其信徒的评估。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2022 Mar;50(1):124-135. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.210053-21. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
Meta-analysis of human prediction error for incentives, perception, cognition, and action.人类激励、感知、认知和行动预测误差的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Jun;47(7):1339-1349. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01264-3. Epub 2022 Jan 11.