Dieck M, Falck I, Lindner J
Z Gerontol. 1986 Jan-Feb;19(1):65-72.
The report is based on a written questionnaire sent to the members of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gerontologie. The rate of return amounted on average to 45% with all four Sections of the Association well represented. 40% of those who answered claim to be active in the scientific field only, 47% work as scientists and practitioners at the same time, and another 9% dedicate their work to practice only. The span of professions as well as branches of science and their specialities is very broad. It may thus be assumed that member composition is a guarantee for multidisciplinarity. 62% of the members who answered claim to have good career prospects in the profession they represent and in their branch of occupation, i.e. in gerontology/geriatrics or in practical fields of work dedicated to applying such knowledge. Nevertheless, one fifth of the members of this professional association see no professional perspectives in the fields named, although their membership in the Association points to a vested interest. One fifth of the members, not identical with the group referred to above, state that they see no chances of employment in gerontology/geriatrics or their fields of application in the long run, or they refrain from presenting a judgment on the grounds of prevailing uncertainty. Critical comments made concern the situation of gerontology/geriatrics in the Federal Republic of Germany. This branch of science is seen as receiving too little recognition and the degree of institutionalisation reached is judged to be rather unsatisfactory.
本报告基于一份发送给德国老年学协会成员的书面调查问卷。回复率平均为45%,协会的所有四个部门都有很好的代表性。40%的受访者声称仅活跃于科学领域,47%同时从事科学家和从业者工作,另有9%仅致力于实践工作。职业范围以及科学分支及其专业非常广泛。因此可以假设成员构成是多学科性的保证。62%的受访者声称在他们所代表的职业及其职业领域,即老年学/老年医学或致力于应用此类知识的实际工作领域,有良好的职业前景。然而,这个专业协会五分之一的成员在上述领域看不到职业前景,尽管他们加入协会表明有既得利益。五分之一的成员(与上述群体不同)表示,从长远来看,他们看不到在老年学/老年医学或其应用领域就业的机会,或者他们因普遍存在的不确定性而不愿做出判断。批评意见涉及德国联邦共和国老年学/老年医学的状况。这一科学分支被认为认可度太低,所达到的制度化程度被判定相当不令人满意。