Research, Technology Transfer and Training Office, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Via P. Maroncelli 40, Meldola, FC, 47014, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST), "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Jul;50(9):2692-2698. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06217-0. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
We performed a systematic survey to assess the existing gaps in Europe in multidisciplinary education for integration of radioligand therapy (RLT) into cancer care and to obtain detailed information on the current limitations and key contents relevant.
A high-quality questionnaire, with emphasis on survey scales, formulation, and validity of the different items, was designed. An expert validation process was undertaken. The survey was circulated among medical specialties involved in cancer treatment, universities, and nursing organizations. Questionnaires (156) were distributed, and 95 responses received.
Sevety-eight percent of medical societies indicated that training in RLT was very important and 12% important. Eighty-eight percent indicated that their specialty training program included RLT. Twenty-six percent were satisfied with the existing structure of training in RLTs. Ninety-four percent indicated that the existing training is based on theory and hands-on experience. Main identified limitations were lack of centers ready to train and of personnel available for teaching. Sixty-five percent indicated that national programs could be expanded. Fifty percent of consulted universities indicated partial or scarce presence of RLT contents in their teaching programs. In 26% of the cases, the students do not have the chance to visit a RLT facility. A large majority of the universities are interested in further expansion of RLT contents in their curriculums. Nursing organizations almost never (44.4%) or occasionally (33.3%) include RLT contents in the education of nurses and technologists. Hands-on experience is almost never (38%) and sometimes (38%) offered. However, 67% of centers indicated high interest in expanding RLT contents.
Centers involved recognize the importance of the training and indicate a need for inclusion of additional clinical content, imaging analysis, and interpretation as well as extended hands-on training. A concerted effort to adapt current programs and a shift towards multidisciplinary training programs is necessary for proper education in RLT in Europe.
我们进行了一项系统调查,以评估欧洲在将放射性配体治疗(RLT)纳入癌症治疗的多学科教育方面存在的差距,并详细了解当前的限制因素和相关的关键内容。
设计了一份高质量的问卷,重点关注调查量表、不同项目的表述和有效性。进行了专家验证过程。该调查在涉及癌症治疗的医学专业、大学和护理组织中进行。共发放了 156 份问卷,收到了 95 份回复。
78%的医学协会表示 RLT 培训非常重要,12%表示重要。88%表示他们的专业培训计划包括 RLT。26%对现有的 RLT 培训结构感到满意。94%表示现有的培训基于理论和实践经验。主要发现的限制因素是缺乏准备好培训的中心和可供教学的人员。65%表示可以扩大国家计划。50%的咨询大学表示其教学计划中部分或很少包含 RLT 内容。在 26%的情况下,学生没有机会参观 RLT 设施。大多数大学有兴趣在其课程中进一步扩展 RLT 内容。护理组织几乎从不(44.4%)或偶尔(33.3%)将 RLT 内容纳入护士和技术员的教育中。几乎从不(38%)或有时(38%)提供实践经验。然而,67%的中心表示对扩展 RLT 内容有浓厚的兴趣。
参与的中心认识到培训的重要性,并表示需要纳入额外的临床内容、成像分析和解释以及扩展的实践培训。需要共同努力适应现有的课程,并向多学科培训课程转变,以便在欧洲进行适当的 RLT 教育。